Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
DePuy Hip Lawsuits in Federal MDL Growing Quickly December 21, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your Comments The number of people filing a lawsuit over recalled DePuy ASR hip replacements has grown quickly in the weeks following a decision to consolidate the federal litigation. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decided to consolidate the DePuy hip recall litigation on December 3rd, assigning all cases filed in courts throughout the United States to Judge David A. Katz in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. At the time the DePuy hip lawsuits were consolidated, there were seven cases transferred to Judge Katz. According to a Conditional Transfer Order filed December 15, in the two weeks since the MDL Panel issued their order, an additional 96 DePuy ASR lawsuits filed in 34 different federal district courts throughout the country were identified. Those cases are also being transferred to Judge Katz’s court for handling during pretrial litigation as part of the multidistrict litigation (MDL). Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION All of the complaints contain similar allegations that DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, manufactured and sold defective metal-on-metal hip implants, and say that the company failed to warn doctors and patients of the higher-than-acceptable risk that the implants would fail. Many say that the company failed to immediately issue a recall after it became apparent that users were experiencing a higher-than-expected rate of DePuy ASR hip problems. In August, a DePuy hip recall was issued for the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System after the manufacturer acknowledged that the systems had 13% and 12% failure rates, respectively. However, some DePuy recall lawyers suggest the failure rate quoted by DePuy may be conservative, and many more people are likely to be affected by the defective hip replacements. Consolidation of the DePuy hip litigation before one judge as part of an MDL is designed to reduce duplicative discovery, avoid contradictory rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the court, witnesses and parties. While the pretrial management of the cases in an MDL is often managed similar to how a class action for the DePuy hip recall would be handled, each claim will still remain an individual lawsuit. If an agreement to settle the DePuy hip lawsuits is not reached following pretrial proceedings and any bellwether jury trials, each of the consolidated cases would be subject to remand back to the jurisdiction where they were originally filed for trial. The DePuy ASR is a metal-on-metal hip replacement system developed in 2005. Health care professionals have increasingly been warning about problems with metal-on-metal hip implants, which can shed metal particles into the body. The particles can damage soft tissue, cause inflammatory reactions and lead to bone loss. The DePuy ASR hip failures appear to be linked to a defective design of the acetabular cup, which is shallower than acetabular cups made by other companies, making it prone to problems. Tags: DePuy, DePuy ASR, Depuy ASR Hip, Hip Implant, Hip Replacement, Johnson & Johnson, Metal Hip Replacement, Metal-on-Metal Hip, Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Otis Elevator Lawsuit Alleges Malfunction Caused Elevator To Descend Uncontrolled January 28, 2026 TikTok Settles Lawsuit Over Social Media Addiction on Eve of Trial January 28, 2026 Vehicle Safety Technology Is Not Causing Higher Automobile Prices: IIHS January 28, 2026 6 Comments Lisa April 26, 2015 PLEASE PLEASE RECALL THE S-ROM & THE PRODIGY STEM. IVE HAD BOTH AND THEY WERE BOTH FAILURES. AS I TYPE I SIT HER WITH A PRODIGY STEM BROKEN IN HALF INSIDE MY FEMUR AND I FACE SERIOUS SURGERY WITH PROBABLE BONE DESTRUCTION JUST TO GET LOWER HALF OF STEM… Please please help us. steve March 4, 2011 The s-rom total hip with the metal on metal design should be part of the recall. The acetabular cup is the exact same as the asr and has caused me and my family years of pain and suffering. Why is the ASR and not the S-ROM recalled this is a real bad situation for anyone who has a S-ROM total hip nightmare. The non cemented metal on metal design is the exact same design please answer this for me IT MAKES NO SENCE. I have suffered since 2002 and must take heavy doses of pain medication do to the “CHRONIC PAIN” caused by the flawed S-ROM HIP WITH THE ACETABULAR SHELL. Also what about the metal fliber that are being exposed to our blood exactly like the asr I do believe the entire focus should be on the acetabular cup/shell non cemented this is where the problem is most evident in both the asr and the s-rom systems. PLEASE help out this cause the S-ROM SYSTEM SHOULD BE RECALLED AS WELL AS THE ASR SYSTEMS. karran January 15, 2011 i think we should be albe to represent ourselves for all the suffering i have experienced , i can’t imagine paying an attorney 45 percent, they need to make some kind of law against this, it is greed and a sin. you alre going to do all the work anyway, i have suffered since oct. 08, not the attorney. sometimes you wonder am i still living in America. i hope this judge sends out a message and tells us just exactly how to represent ourselves……. that is while we still have a brain left from all the metal entering our bodies……. Jim January 6, 2011 I had the following S-ROM components implanted 2-22-06; from the operative report: 20x15x165 36 standard neck, +8 lateral stem, with a 20 F XXL sleeve, a 36mm Ultamet, witha 58-mm Pinnacle sector II acetabular cup with no screws, a 36-mm + 9 head. Are any of these components part of the recall? Juergen December 21, 2010 Are you also interested in DePuy Pinnacle Sector II Metal-on-Metal victims? bcuz December 21, 2010 What about the ASR Hip Implants that are not metal to metal, but just the same, had to be replaced? What are we to do? How will we be compensated, even though, they are also failing. Do we just forget about it, because of the Judge’s ruling has decided to limited the Liability. What about us? Where or who do we go to for justice? EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Bard PowerPort Settlement Talks May Heat Up as First Bellwether Trials Approach in 2026 (Posted: yesterday) As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (01/15/2026)Cook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025) Abbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (Posted: 2 days ago) A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims an Abbott Eterna device failed after only two months due to lead migration. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)FDA Tells Doctors To Conduct Trial Stimulation Test Before Using Spinal Cord Stimulators (09/04/2020) Proposed Depo-Provera Lawsuit Schedule Calls for First Trial in Dec. 2026 (Posted: 5 days ago) Lawyers involved in Depo-Provera litigation have agreed to hold the first bellwether trial over brain tumor injuries beginning on December 7, 2026. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Followed Memory Loss, Dizziness Symptoms (01/20/2026)Depo-Provera Lawyers Intending To Remain in MDL Leadership Must Seek Reappointment: Judge (01/14/2026)Side Effects From Depo-Provera Shots Led to Brain Tumor, Multiple Surgeries: Lawsuit (01/06/2026)
Bard PowerPort Settlement Talks May Heat Up as First Bellwether Trials Approach in 2026 (Posted: yesterday) As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (01/15/2026)Cook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025)
Abbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (Posted: 2 days ago) A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims an Abbott Eterna device failed after only two months due to lead migration. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)FDA Tells Doctors To Conduct Trial Stimulation Test Before Using Spinal Cord Stimulators (09/04/2020)
Proposed Depo-Provera Lawsuit Schedule Calls for First Trial in Dec. 2026 (Posted: 5 days ago) Lawyers involved in Depo-Provera litigation have agreed to hold the first bellwether trial over brain tumor injuries beginning on December 7, 2026. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Followed Memory Loss, Dizziness Symptoms (01/20/2026)Depo-Provera Lawyers Intending To Remain in MDL Leadership Must Seek Reappointment: Judge (01/14/2026)Side Effects From Depo-Provera Shots Led to Brain Tumor, Multiple Surgeries: Lawsuit (01/06/2026)