Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
DePuy Pinnacle Hip Metal Liner Discontinued Amid Lawsuits, Problems May 16, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Amid a growing number of DePuy Pinnacle hip lawsuits and mounting concerns about problems with metal-on-metal hip replacement systems, DePuy has announced that it is discontinuing the metal line made exclusively for the Pinnacle Acetabular Cup system. In a press release issued today, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. indicated that it is stopping sales of the Ultamet metal-on-metal and Complete ceramic-on-metal hip systems, which include the same metal liner that is designed exclusively for use with the DePuy Pinnacle hip in a metal-on-metal configuration. In addition to citing low sales for the metal liner, the company noted that proposed FDA regulation of metal-on-metal hip implants was a factor in discontinuing sales. Stay Up-to-Date About hip replacement lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new hip replacement lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Hip Replacement Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new hip replacement lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More The FDA has called for metal hip manufacturers to go through more stringent clinical trials and premarket approval processes before placing artificial hip products on the market. Part of the reason the agency was pushed to its decision was due to an August 2010 recall of the DePuy ASR metal-on-metal hip implant that affected more than 93,000 artificial hip systems worldwide and led to thousands of lawsuits against the company. The DePuy Pinnacle hip system was introduced in 2001, with some variations containing the metal liner. The metal-on-metal configuration was used as the basis for the approval of the DePuy ASR hip implant in 2005, with Johnson & Johnson obtaining “fast track” 510k approval by maintaining that the DePuy ASR and DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal hips feature “substantially similar” designs. However, the DePuy Pinnacle was also approved under the FDA’s controversial 510k system as a substantial equivalent to older metal hips, which has allowed both designs to be implanted in thousands of people without federal regulators requiring stringent clinical trials to examine the safety of the design. The company’s press release says that the Pinnacle Cup is not affected by the discontinuation, indicating that the Pinnacle will continue to be offered with both medical-grade plastic and ceramic liners. DePuy Pinnacle Hip Lawsuits and Calls for Recall More than 4,000 product liability lawsuits have been filed throughout the federal court system by people who have experienced problems with the DePuy Pinnacle hip when it was implanted with the metal liner. The lawsuits allege that as the metal parts rub against each other, metallic debris is released into the body, which may cause the artificial hip to loosen and ultimately fail. Many of these complaints allege that a DePuy Pinnacle hip recall should have been issued after post-marketing reports made it clear that an unreasonable number of patient were experiencing complications within a few years of surgery. Although Johnson & Johnson’s DePuy subsidiary has kept the Pinnacle metal liner on the market, most doctors have abandoned use of all metal-on-metal configurations due to concerns about the safety. DePuy acknowledges the sharp decline in the use of metal-on-metal hip replacement systems worldwide that is driving it to consolidate its products. The company says that metal-on-metal systems now make up less than 2% of those implanted annually in the U.S. and Europe; a 90% decline industry-wide since 2007. All Metal-on-Metal Hips Under Investigation In recent years, the FDA has increased scrutiny of metal-on-metal hips in response to concerns about the effects of metallic debris that may be released as the metal parts rub against each other, potentially causing tissue damage and metal blood poisoning, also known as metallosis. In January, the FDA released new guidance for metal-on-metal hip replacements that called for them to go through the PMA process. The agency told doctors that metal-on-metal hip replacement systems should only be used if other artificial hip implants were not appropriate, and called on manufacturers to prove that their implants were safe enough to stay on the market. Thousands of individuals throughout the United States are currently pursuing product liability lawsuits against the makers of metal-on-metal hip replacement systems. In addition to lawsuits over the DePuy Pinnacle, a substantial number of DePuy ASR hip lawsuits, Biomet M2A Magnum Hip lawsuits and Wright Conserve Cup lawsuits are pending nationwide. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Hip Replacement, Johnson & Johnson, Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement, Metallosis Image Credit: | More Hip Replacements Lawsuit Stories Biomet Hip Lawsuit Filed Over Defective M2A Metal-on-Metal Implant December 26, 2024 Zimmer Biomet Lawsuit Filed Over RibFix Blu Implant Fracture September 25, 2024 Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (Posted: today) Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITPresentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (01/05/2026)Hair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (11/13/2025) Bard PowerPort Settlement Talks May Heat Up as First Bellwether Trials Approach in 2026 (Posted: yesterday) As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (01/15/2026)Cook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025) Abbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (Posted: 2 days ago) A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims an Abbott Eterna device failed after only two months due to lead migration. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)FDA Tells Doctors To Conduct Trial Stimulation Test Before Using Spinal Cord Stimulators (09/04/2020)
Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024
Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (Posted: today) Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITPresentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (01/05/2026)Hair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (11/13/2025)
Bard PowerPort Settlement Talks May Heat Up as First Bellwether Trials Approach in 2026 (Posted: yesterday) As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (01/15/2026)Cook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025)
Abbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (Posted: 2 days ago) A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims an Abbott Eterna device failed after only two months due to lead migration. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)FDA Tells Doctors To Conduct Trial Stimulation Test Before Using Spinal Cord Stimulators (09/04/2020)