DePuy Pinnacle Recall Should Have been Issued Years Ago: Lawsuit

According to allegations raised in a DePuy Pinnacle hip lawsuit filed earlier this month by a Pennsylvania woman, the manufacturer of the implant used during her hip replacement has known for some time that it was a defective and dangerous device, and should have removed it from the market years ago. 

The complaint was filed on April 5 by Anna Maria Sillman in The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and the designer of the metal-on-metal hip replacement.

The DePuy Pinnacle hip system was introduced in 2001, with some variations containing a metal liner instead of a polyethylene liner, which can result in microscopic metal particles being shed into the body as the metal parts of the hip replacement rub against each other. This can lead to inflammation, swelling, loosening of the parts and ultimately may cause the hip replacement to fail, resulting in the need for hip revision surgery.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

According to allegations raised in the complaint, the defendants had received hundreds of adverse event reports of DePuy Pinnacle hip problems before Sillman had her hip system implanted. Sillman argues that based on information available to the manufacturers, a DePuy Pinnacle hip recall should have been issued before January 2004.

A growing number of people throughout the United States have filed a similar DePuy Pinnacle recall lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and their DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary, arguing that the implant should have been removed from the market.

The companies did issue a recall for the DePuy ASR hip replacement system in August 2010, due to problems that are similar to what has been reported in connection with the Pinnacle hip. The DePuy ASR was approved by the FDA in 2005 as a “substantially equivalent” design to the DePuy Pinnacle. Post-marketing data provided at the time of that recall indicated that the DePuy ASR failure rate was about 12-13%, but some estimates suggest that nearly half of the recalled ASR hip replacements may lead to problems within six years.

Over the past year, concerns about metal-on-metal hip replacements have been growing. In October, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) issued a warning about potential problems with metal on-metal hip replacements, indicating that patients and the medical community should be aware that pain months after hip replacement surgery may be a sign of metal-on-metal hip cobalt toxicity. In addition, the FDA launched a new website in February to provide information about the risks associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements.

As a result of the growing number of DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits that have been filed in federal district courts throughout the United States by individuals who have experienced problems with their hip replacement, a motion was filed last month to consolidate the DePuy Pinnacle litigation before on judge for coordinated handling. The DePuy ASR hip recall litigation is already consolidated as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio before U.S. District Judge David A. Katz.


  • sherylApril 28, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    I had a hip replacement in August 2010. Mine has dislocated twice in less than a year. It was a corail pinnacle made by Depuy. My doctor wants to wait and let me do physical therapy and if it happens again do surgery again. He originally said mine wasnt on the recall list but now I think that maybe it is. Help what should I do?

"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Framework for Talcum Powder Science Day Before New MDL Judge Proposed by Parties
Framework for Talcum Powder Science Day Before New MDL Judge Proposed by Parties (Posted yesterday)

The new federal judge overseeing all talcum powder lawsuits has called for a Science Day to educate the court ahead of planned Daubert hearings which could decide if bellwether test trials can move forward.