Miflex Scuba Diving Hose Recalled Issued After 189 Failure Reports

About 17,000 Miflex High Pressure Scuba Diving Hoses have been recalled following a number of reports that suggest they may fail, potentially leaving scuba divers short on air. 

The Miflex scuba diving hose recall was announced by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on April 19, after the manufacturer, XS Scuba, Inc. of Santa Ana, California, received at least 189 reports of hose failures.

The failures appear to occur because the diving hose has a tendency to rupture, the CPSC reports. The ruptures may reduce the available air to the diver, resulting in a drowning hazard. Despite the large number of reported problems, there have been no confirmed injuries linked to the defective diving hose.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The recall affects three models of high pressure diving hoses that monitor cylinder pressure for the air supply in tanks for scuba diving. The models include the Deluxe Cylinder Equalizer w/ Miflex HP hose P/N AC366, the Miflex Two-Gauge Console HL300/HL300M, and the Miflex Rebreather Kits MRB-EVO-LG, MRB-EVO-MD & MRB-ISP-POST-LG. All of the affected hoses have MFX stamped on the end of the fitting.

The hoses were sold as individual replacement gauge hoses and as cascade hoses at scuba diving retailers and online between May 2009 through April 2012 for between $44 and $60.

The CPSC recommends that consumers immediately stop using the hoses and contact XS Scuba for details on how to receive a free replacement hose. Consumers with questions can contact XS Scuba at (888) 249-5405 or by visiting the company’s website at www.xsscuba.com.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted today)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California (Posted yesterday)

U.S. JPML has transferred all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings as part of a federal MDL (multidistrict litigation).