DuPont Toxic Tort Lawsuit Results in Plaintiff’s Verdict Over Chemical Spill

|

A Kentucky jury awarded $1.25 million in damages to six plaintiffs earlier this month, in what is the first stage of a large chemical spill lawsuit against DuPont that could result in the largest environmental tort award in Kentucky history.

The toxic tort lawsuit stems from an October 11, 2004 chemical spill at a DuPont plant in Wurtland, Ky., when a cracked pipe resulted in the release of a cloud of sulfuric acid over the neighboring communities.

The six plaintiffs are the first of 179 alleged victims with claims against the large chemical manufacturer. Some of the plaintiffs include firefighters and police who suffered injuries while assisting with evacuation and emergency response for the affected area.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

This first ruling determined that gross negligence on the part of DuPont was the cause for the spill and the victimsโ€™ injuries, and multiplied the medical costs of the injuries suffered by the plaintiffs by 10 to determine the punitive damages. The remaining trials will be aimed at determining the medical compensation of the other 173 victims, and then will apply that same multiplier to reach the punitive damages amount.

U.S. District Judge David Bunning has ruled that DuPont cannot appeal the verdict until a decision has been reached on all 179 plaintiffsโ€™ claims.

The cracked pipe was carrying sulfur trioxide, but when released into the atmosphere, it became a cloud of sulfuric acid. Injuries included skin burns, eye irritation and respiratory problems. Victims ranged in age from 18 months to 80 years of age from across Greenup County, Kentucky.

The incident was the second of its kind from the plant, which had a similar accident in 1995 that resulted in a 23,800 gallon leak and the evacuation of more than 1,000 residents. DuPont was sued for that incident as well, and also had to pay the Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency $1.5 million. Litigation in that incident is still ongoing.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Growing reports of GalaFLEX breast mesh complications have raised concerns about women who required explant surgery, revision procedures or implant removal after the synthetic mesh was used during breast augmentation, breast lift, implant revision or reconstruction surgery.
Pfizer continues to face Depo-Provera lawsuits from across the U.S., including one by a woman who says she learned of her brain tumor nearly 30 years after she stopped receiving the injections.
A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.