ERCP Infection Lawsuits Filed Against Duodenoscopes Makers Over CRE Outbreak

|

Olympus Corp. faces at least two product liability lawsuits, including a wrongful death claim, following antibiotic-resistant infections alleged caused by duodenoscopes used during ERCP procedures at UCLA’s Ronald Reagan Medical Center.

At least 179 patients who under went an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at the California hospital between October 2014 and January 2015 have been warned that they may have been exposed to a risk of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections, after at least seven illnesses and two deaths were linked to contaminated duodenoscopes manufactured by Olympus.

On Wednesday, the family of Antonia Cerda, a 48-year-old mother, filed a wrongful death lawsuit, alleging that the manufacturer was provided inadequate warnings and instructions about the proper cleaning of the endoscopic surgery devices.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The complaint comes just days after another ERCP infection lawsuit was filed by Aaron Young, an 18-year-old high school student still recovering from the illness, raising similar allegations against the Japanese medical device manufacturer.

According to the claims, patients may be exposed to a risk of infections following ERCP procedures, even if the duodenoscopes are cleaned according to the manufacturer instructions.

The ERCP infections have been described as a “nightmare bacteria”, as CRE not only resists treatment by antibiotics, but it results in death for about those it infects.

Duodenoscopes are flexible, lit tubes that are inserted down the throat to the top of the small intestines for gastrointestinal procedures. They allow contrast dye to be injected and can be used with other medical instruments to retrieve biopsy samples. The FDA estimates that more than 500,000 ERCP duodenoscope procedures occur each year in the U.S.

According to an FDA safety communication issued last week, duodenoscopes may have designs that make them difficult to clean properly even when doctors and health care professionals follow the recommended steps for cleaning it. Many of the devices include a movable “elevator” at the tip, which may trap pathogens and blood even when recommended cleaning techniques are used.

Both of the lawsuits accuse Olympus of negligence due to inadequate cleaning instructions it allegedly provided to the medical community on how to properly sanitize the instruments after an ERCP procedure. Neither claim targets UCLA, which says it followed the company’s recommended cleaning procedures to the letter.

Attorneys familiar with the case say that there are likely more lawsuits pending.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

As FanDuel and other sportsbooks push parlay betting and social gambling features ahead of major events like the Super Bowl, lawsuits are being investigated over whether these high-risk products fueled gambling addiction and financial harm among young users.
A nitrous oxide lawsuit filed against Amazon and other manufacturers and distributors alleges the defendants knowingly sold nitrous oxide canisters for illegal recreational use without adequate warnings, and in violation of state and federal laws.