Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Plaintiffs Indicate Exactech Hip and Knee Settlements are “Nowhere Close”, In Urging Judge To Reject Request for Off-Record Conference Late last month, the manufacturer of recalled Exactech implants asked a judge to halt the active litigation while parties discuss a potential global hip and knee lawsuit settlement. April 1, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Plaintiffs are asking the U.S. District Judge presiding over all Exactech knee replacement lawsuits and hip replacement lawsuits to reject a request by manufacturers of the recalled implants for an “off-record conference”, so that it can explain why all deadlines in the litigation should be paused while a global settlement is explored, indicating that the parties are “nowhere close” to reaching an agreement to resolve the claims. There are currently more than 2,000 product liability lawsuits that have been filed since an Exactech recall was first issued in February 2022, involving defective packaging that caused certain plastic components to degrade and fail after they were implanted into patients. The recall impacted more than than 140,000 Optetrak, Optetrak Logic and Truliant knee replacement systems implanted in patients since 2004, as well as 1,500 components used in Exactech Vantage ankle replacements. Similar packaging problems have also impacted Exactech Novation and Acumatch hip implants since 2008, which were recalled in June 2021. The Exactech hip recall was expanded in August 2022 to add another 40,000 joint replacements that may fail prematurely. Given common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints filed throughout the federal court system, consolidated pretrial proceedings have been established before U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York, where the parties are actively preparing a group of representative cases for early trial dates that are expected to begin next year. However, there are also Exactech lawsuits pending in Florida state court, where the first bellwether trial is expected to begin on October 7, 2024. Learn More About Knee Replacement Lawsuits If you or a loved one experienced complications or required revision surgery due to a defective knee replacement implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Knee Replacement Lawsuits If you or a loved one experienced complications or required revision surgery due to a defective knee replacement implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION As part of the coordinated management of the federal litigation, the parties face a number of approaching deadlines to get the first cases ready to go to trial, which are expected to help the parties gauge how juries may to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation. While the outcome of these early bellwether trials will not have any binding impact on other claims, the average lawsuit payout would likely have a substantial impact on the amount Exactech must pay in any global hip and knee replacement settlement for individuals who received the defective implants. Plaintiffs Reject Call for In Camera Conference Late last month, defendants asked for an in camera (in chambers) conference to be held in the near future, to discuss a possible global Exactech hip and knee settlement agreement before the first trials begin, requesting a stay of all MDL deadlines in the meantime. However, on March 29 plaintiffs’ attorneys sent a letter (PDF) to Judge Garaufis, urging him to reject the request. They argue there is no compelling reason for the court to yet be involved in these discussions, and no need for the litigation to be stayed at this point. “Plaintiffs do not consent to an in camera, off-record conference. While such conferences can be productive under certain, limited circumstances, Plaintiffs have found no authority supporting conducting such conferences over the objection of one of the parties,” the letter states. “In fact, the authorities support the proposition that in the absence of agreement of all parties, conferences should be held in open court, on the record.” The letter indicates that such a conference to discuss a potential settlement is currently not necessary, stating that the parties have had only limited negotiations, and are “nowhere close to reaching any proposed settlement.” Unless the court agrees to pause all deadlines in the litigation, the parties are expected to identify a series of Exactech bellwether cases that will be eligible for early trial dates in April 2024. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Exactech, Hip Implant Recall, Hip Replacement, Knee Implant, Knee Implant Recall, Knee Replacement System, Optetrak More Knee Replacement Lawsuit Stories Exactech Implant Settlement Results in $8M Payout Over High Failure Rates September 19, 2025 Settlement Reached in Biomet Vanguard Knee Replacement Lawsuit August 14, 2025 Zimmer Biomet Bone Cement Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Knee Replacement July 10, 2025 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Amazon Faces Lawsuit Over Galaxy Gas, Other Nitrous Oxide Canister Sales (Posted: yesterday) A nitrous oxide lawsuit filed against Amazon and other manufacturers and distributors alleges the defendants knowingly sold nitrous oxide canisters for illegal recreational use without adequate warnings, and in violation of state and federal laws. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITAmazon Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Alleges Platform Responsible for Whippet Injuries (01/29/2026)The ‘Can’t Feel My Feet’ Symptom Doctors See in Nitrous Oxide Nerve Injury (01/16/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Nitrous Oxide Use Led to Child’s Death at Dentist (01/05/2026) MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge has laid out a series of deadlines for selecting the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuits to go before juries. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITLawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (01/28/2026)Presentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (01/05/2026)Hair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025) CTCL Diagnosis Leads to Lawsuit Over Dupixent Cancer Risks (Posted: 3 days ago) A Dupixent cancer lawsuit indicates that manufacturers knew of the risks of CTCL, yet failed to report them to patients or doctors. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Dupixent Side Effects Led to CTCL Cancer Diagnosis (01/12/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Cancer Diagnosis After One Year of Injections (12/30/2025)Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Diagnosis (12/19/2025)
Amazon Faces Lawsuit Over Galaxy Gas, Other Nitrous Oxide Canister Sales (Posted: yesterday) A nitrous oxide lawsuit filed against Amazon and other manufacturers and distributors alleges the defendants knowingly sold nitrous oxide canisters for illegal recreational use without adequate warnings, and in violation of state and federal laws. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITAmazon Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Alleges Platform Responsible for Whippet Injuries (01/29/2026)The ‘Can’t Feel My Feet’ Symptom Doctors See in Nitrous Oxide Nerve Injury (01/16/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Nitrous Oxide Use Led to Child’s Death at Dentist (01/05/2026)
MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge has laid out a series of deadlines for selecting the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuits to go before juries. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITLawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (01/28/2026)Presentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (01/05/2026)Hair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)
CTCL Diagnosis Leads to Lawsuit Over Dupixent Cancer Risks (Posted: 3 days ago) A Dupixent cancer lawsuit indicates that manufacturers knew of the risks of CTCL, yet failed to report them to patients or doctors. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Dupixent Side Effects Led to CTCL Cancer Diagnosis (01/12/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Cancer Diagnosis After One Year of Injections (12/30/2025)Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Diagnosis (12/19/2025)