Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Plaintiffs Indicate Exactech Hip and Knee Settlements are “Nowhere Close”, In Urging Judge To Reject Request for Off-Record ConferenceLate last month, the manufacturer of recalled Exactech implants asked a judge to halt the active litigation while parties discuss a potential global hip and knee lawsuit settlement. April 1, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsPlaintiffs are asking the U.S. District Judge presiding over all Exactech knee replacement lawsuits and hip replacement lawsuits to reject a request by manufacturers of the recalled implants for an “off-record conference”, so that it can explain why all deadlines in the litigation should be paused while a global settlement is explored, indicating that the parties are “nowhere close” to reaching an agreement to resolve the claims.There are currently more than 2,000 product liability lawsuits that have been filed since anย Exactech recallย was first issued in February 2022, involving defective packaging that caused certain plastic components to degrade and fail after they were implanted into patients. The recall impacted more than than 140,000 Optetrak, Optetrak Logic and Truliant knee replacement systems implanted in patients since 2004, as well as 1,500 components used in Exactech Vantage ankle replacements.Similar packaging problems have also impacted Exactech Novation and Acumatch hip implants since 2008, which were recalled in June 2021. Theย Exactech hip recall was expandedย in August 2022 to add another 40,000 joint replacements that may fail prematurely.Given common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints filed throughout the federal court system, consolidated pretrial proceedings have been established before U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York, where the parties are actively preparing a group of representative cases for early trial dates that are expected to begin next year. However, there are also Exactech lawsuits pending in Florida state court, where the first bellwether trial is expected to begin on October 7, 2024.Learn More AboutKnee Replacement LawsuitsIf you or a loved one experienced complications or required revision surgery due to a defective knee replacement implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONLearn More AboutKnee Replacement LawsuitsIf you or a loved one experienced complications or required revision surgery due to a defective knee replacement implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAs part of the coordinated management of the federal litigation, the parties face a number of approaching deadlines to get the first cases ready to go to trial, which are expected to help the parties gauge how juries may to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation.While the outcome of these early bellwether trials will not have any binding impact on other claims, the average lawsuit payout would likely have a substantial impact on the amount Exactech must pay in any global hip and knee replacement settlement for individuals who received the defective implants.Plaintiffs Reject Call for In Camera ConferenceLate last month, defendants asked for an in camera (in chambers) conference to be held in the near future, to discuss a possible global Exactech hip and knee settlement agreement before the first trials begin, requesting a stay of all MDL deadlines in the meantime.However, on March 29 plaintiffsโ attorneys sent a letter (PDF) to Judge Garaufis, urging him to reject the request. They argue there is no compelling reason for the court to yet be involved in these discussions, and no need for the litigation to be stayed at this point.โPlaintiffs do not consent to an in camera, off-record conference. While such conferences can be productive under certain, limited circumstances, Plaintiffs have found no authority supporting conducting such conferences over the objection of one of the parties,โ the letter states. โIn fact, the authorities support the proposition that in the absence of agreement of all parties, conferences should be held in open court, on the record.โThe letter indicates that such a conference to discuss a potential settlement is currently not necessary, stating that the parties have had only limited negotiations, and are โnowhere close to reaching any proposed settlement.โUnless the court agrees to pause all deadlines in the litigation, the parties are expected to identify a series of Exactech bellwether cases that will be eligible for early trial dates in April 2024. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Exactech, Hip Implant Recall, Hip Replacement, Knee Implant, Knee Implant Recall, Knee Replacement System, OptetrakMore Knee Replacement Lawsuit Stories Exactech Implant Settlement Results in $8M Payout Over High Failure Rates September 19, 2025 Settlement Reached in Biomet Vanguard Knee Replacement Lawsuit August 14, 2025 Zimmer Biomet Bone Cement Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Knee Replacement July 10, 2025 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Skin Cancer Lawsuit Filed After Man Diagnosed With Mycosis Fungoides (Posted: today)A man’s Dupixent skin cancer lawsuit claims the eczema treatment led to a CTCL diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Risks Lead Experts to Recommend Skin Biopsies Before Treatment (10/16/2026)Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (10/01/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026) Fujifilm and Olympus Scope Infection Risks Highlight Growing Need for Advanced Disinfection Systems: Report (Posted: yesterday)Concerns about life-threatening infections associated with reusable medical scopes are increasing the need for advanced disinfection technology to protect patients from bacterial contamination.MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUITOlympus Medical Device Warning Letter Follows FDA Inspections of Six Manufacturing Facilities (10/16/2026)Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection (09/03/2026)Olympus Colonoscopy Lawsuit Over C. Diff Infection Set for Status Hearing in September 2026 (08/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 4 days ago)A Georgia womanโs spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges she suffered painful shocks and permanent injuries after an Abbott device’s leads migrated out of position.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMaster Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (10/12/2026)Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)
Dupixent Skin Cancer Lawsuit Filed After Man Diagnosed With Mycosis Fungoides (Posted: today)A man’s Dupixent skin cancer lawsuit claims the eczema treatment led to a CTCL diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Risks Lead Experts to Recommend Skin Biopsies Before Treatment (10/16/2026)Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (10/01/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)
Fujifilm and Olympus Scope Infection Risks Highlight Growing Need for Advanced Disinfection Systems: Report (Posted: yesterday)Concerns about life-threatening infections associated with reusable medical scopes are increasing the need for advanced disinfection technology to protect patients from bacterial contamination.MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUITOlympus Medical Device Warning Letter Follows FDA Inspections of Six Manufacturing Facilities (10/16/2026)Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection (09/03/2026)Olympus Colonoscopy Lawsuit Over C. Diff Infection Set for Status Hearing in September 2026 (08/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 4 days ago)A Georgia womanโs spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges she suffered painful shocks and permanent injuries after an Abbott device’s leads migrated out of position.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMaster Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (10/12/2026)Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)