Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Exactech Truliant Knee Lawsuit Filed After Revision Surgery Caused By Degraded Polyethylene Insert The Truliant knee lawsuit indicates the Exactech implant failed after just over a year. January 18, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, packaging problems resulted in the early failure of an Exactech Truliant knee replacement, after a polyethylene insert degraded and resulted in the need for revision surgery only a few years after the device was implanted. The complaint (PDF) was filed last month in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee by Billy Hursey, indicating that his doctors used an Exactech Truliant Posterior Stabilized Knee System during a joint replacement surgery in July 2021, which was recalled by the manufacturer only a few months later. An Exactech Trulian knee recall was issued in February 2022, impacting 24,727 components implanted since 2017, since they were distributed in defective vacuum bags, which failed to prevent oxygen from reaching a plastic insert before it was placed in the body. This resulted in oxidation of the components, making them prone to fail prematurely. The case joins a growing number of Exactech knee lawsuit filed since the recall, which also impacted another 120,000 Optetrak and Optetrack Logic total knee replacement systems distributed since 2004, which have been linked to an alarmingly high failure rate for years. Learn More About Knee Replacement Lawsuits If you or a loved one experienced complications or required revision surgery due to a defective knee replacement implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Knee Replacement Lawsuits If you or a loved one experienced complications or required revision surgery due to a defective knee replacement implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The Exactech Truliant knee system was approved through the FDAโs 510(k) fast-track approval process, including a mix of polyethylene and metal components. The manufacturer promoted the device as โan evolution of the Optetrak lineage,โ Hurseyโs lawsuit states, without recognizing that long-standing packaging problems made the implants defective and unreasonably dangerous. Exactech Truliant Knee Failed One Year After Surgery According to the lawsuit, Hursey, of Tennessee, underwent left knee replacement surgery in July 2021, at which time he was implanted with a Truliant Posterior Stabilized Knee System, which was later affected by the recall. After experiencing pain, instability, synovitis and swelling, which ultimately resulted in an inability to walk, Hursey had the implant removed during revision surgery in August 2022. At that time, the surgeon noted that the tibial insert was damaged along the medial edge, which Hursey indicates was a direct result of the packaging defects. โAs a result of Defendantsโ failure to properly package the Truliant Device prior to distribution, the polyethylene liner prematurely degraded and Plaintiff Billy Hursey required revision surgery due to severe pain, swelling, and instability in the knee and leg,โ the lawsuit states. โThese injuries were caused by early and preventable wear of the polyethylene insert and resulting component loosening and/or other failures causing serious complications including tissue damage, osteolysis, permanent bone loss and other injuries.โ Lawsuits Over Exactech Truliant and Optetrak Knee Replacements According to allegations raised in knee replacement lawsuits being filed against Exactech by Hursey and other plaintiffs, the manufacturer knew or should have known about high failure rates associated with Optetrak and Trulian knee implants long before doctors and patients were warned about the problems. At least as early as 2017,ย lawsuits over Exactech Optetrak knee implantsย indicated there were alarming rates of adverse event reports being submitted to the FDA involving premature knee replacement revision surgery, which resulted in what some said was a โsilentโ Exactech recall when the company began slowly and quietly replacing the tibial trays of some Optetrak models. In November, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML)ย centralized all Exactech lawsuits in an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, and transferred the claims to U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York, to coordinated discovery into common issues in the claims, avoid conflicting pretrial schedules and to serve the convenience of common witnesses and parties involved lawsuits that were spread out throughout the federal court system. In addition to lawsuits over Exactech Truliant and Optetrak components, the litigation also includes Exactech hip replacement lawsuits filed over similar packaging defects with its Connexion GXL acetabular polyethylene liners, which have also been found to prematurely degrade and fail. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Exactech, Knee Implant, Knee Implant Recall, Knee Replacement System, Optetrak, Truliant Knee Replacement System Image Credit: | More Knee Replacement Lawsuit Stories Exactech Implant Settlement Results in $8M Payout Over High Failure Rates September 19, 2025 Settlement Reached in Biomet Vanguard Knee Replacement Lawsuit August 14, 2025 Zimmer Biomet Bone Cement Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Knee Replacement July 10, 2025 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: yesterday) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026) Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: 2 days ago) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 3 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: yesterday) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)
Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: 2 days ago) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 3 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)