Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Exxon Gas Leak Lawsuit Results in $495M Compensatory Award June 30, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsA Maryland jury has awarded nearly $500 million in compensatory damages to families and businesses that were affected an underground gasoline leak in 2006, which contaminated well water and impacted property values in the area.ย ย The Maryland environmental tort lawsuit was filed by a group of 154 families and other property owners from Jacksonville, Maryland, who accused the Exxon-Mobile of trying to cover up the release of an estimated 25,000 gallons of unleaded gasoline from one of the lines that transported the gas to a fuel dispenser.While no one has been reported ill from the release, property owners say that the spill will require many residents to receive medical monitoring for years to ensure their health and that the groundwater contamination has lowered property values in the area surrounding the now-defunct gas station.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONTheย Baltimore Countyย jury agreed with plaintiffs, finding that Exxon attempted to deceive the community about the nature of the incident, why the gas station was closed and the extent of the damage from the spill. The jury found Exxon responsible for the diminution of property value, fraud, negligence, nuisance, strict liability, trespass, and says the company should be held liable for those charges as well as emotional distress and paying for medical monitoring.Deliberations continue today as the jury tries to decide on punitive damages and considers a request by plaintiffs that additional damages be awarded to punish the company and deter similar actions in the future.Exxon-Mobil has argued that it has acted in good faith to clean up the spill and is working with the state to remediate the site, which is one of 515 leaking underground storage tank (LUST) remediation sites currently underway across the state, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.When the spill first occurred, the company put up a sign saying that the station was closed for upgrades and did not immediately warn the public that there had been a spill. Monitoring wells close to the station contained 15 feet of gasoline when the leak was first discovered.In 2008, Exxon-Mobil entered into a consent decree to clean up the site. And in 2009, the first group of families, involving about 90 plaintiffs, sued the company and received $150 million in compensatory awards. Exxon is currently challenging that verdict.Photo Courtesy of: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rockinfree/ / CC BY 2.0 Tags: Environmental Tort, Exxon, Gasoline, Maryland, Toxic Tort Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial September 9, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Apple AirTag Tracked Vehicle Location for Months September 9, 2026 Chlorpyrifos Autism Link May Involve Immune, Inflammatory Gene Changes: Study September 9, 2026 3 Comments brian July 7, 2011 case cite? Joan July 1, 2011 Thank God there is some justice in this world and the people who have illness from this spill and whose property has lost it’s value will be compensated. There is no way that Exxon did not know what was going on and there is no way they would not try to hide it to avoid paying damages. They have gotten out of paying up in the past with other much bigger spills (like Valdez) and will always try again. They have no moral integrity – it’s all about money for them. Nemo June 30, 2011 I have two personal injury claims against Exxon Mobil for the death of two adult nationals in Papua New Guinea, a developing nation located north of Australia and east of Indonesia. Exxon Mobil through its subsidiary Esso Highlands Ltd is developing one of the world’s largest Liquefied Natural Gas project. One of its contractor was negligent in not felling a huge fig tree in the middle of its road construction site when in fact it was a real safety hazard to human lives. The expatriate supervisor refused to fell the tree even though the employees asked him to do so and even though a local who had his family hut nearby asked him to fell the tree. A week later the tree fell because of heavy rain and wind. I have overwhelming evidence that the contractor and Esso Highlands never usually have certified safety officers on sites to observe, identify and advise for safety hazards to be eliminated or removed. This is a serious compromise of safety. Safety in an extraction industry is of paramount importance. An expert investigation report compiled by a hired consultant based in Australia points to the contractor’s negligence. The contractor’s employees statements point finger at the expatriate supervisor’s negligence. Even the contractor’s own investigation report states that it made a serious mistake to clear the site because it venture outside the approved survey markers and into a cultural heritage site and destroyed the environment. Attempts to negotiate settlement out of court has been unsuccessful because Esso Highlands and its contractor have been arrogant and bullish despite very cogent evidence of civil liability. Could you please help me publish this and invite interested law firms in the United States that can help me institute civil claim against Exxon Mobil on the basis of vicarious liability arising from its subsidiary and its contractor’s negligence. I have all the relevant documentary evidence ready to supply to a firm that is willing to help me. Thank you very much. PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026) Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026) Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (Posted: 6 days ago)Certain Infinion CX spinal cord stimulator leads from Boston Scientific have been recalled after more than 1,000 serious injuries were linked to fractures that may disrupt stimulation and require additional surgery.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJudge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (08/24/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)
Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (Posted: 6 days ago)Certain Infinion CX spinal cord stimulator leads from Boston Scientific have been recalled after more than 1,000 serious injuries were linked to fractures that may disrupt stimulation and require additional surgery.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJudge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (08/24/2026)