Respiratory Problems Lead to Clair-Sprayway Fabric Protector Spray Recall

About 73,500 cans of Claire-Sprayway fabric protector spray, sold under a variety of brand names, have been recalled due to a number of reports of respiratory problems.ย 

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the fabric protector spray recall on October 21. The CPSC warns that the aerosol spray can pose a serious respiratory hazard to consumers after the manufacturer, Clair-Sprayway Inc., received 36 reports of overexposure to fumes from the products. In 34 cases, consumers suffered coughing, wheezing or shortness of breath. One person was diagnosed with serious respiratory injury following exposure.

The fabric protector recall affects 13.5 0z aerosol cans sold under the following labels:ย ย 

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
  • Spraywayยฎ No. 980 Industrial Fabric Protector
  • 3D Fabric Protector
  • Auto Brite Fabric Protector Guardatela
  • Auto Magicยฎ Fabric Protector No. 91-S
  • Crystal Aire Products #680 Fabric Protector
  • Falcon Labsยฎ Spotless Fabric Protector
  • Quiltprotectโ„ข Spray
  • Robbieโ€™sโ„ข Fabric Shield
  • Showcar Fabric Protector
  • Simonizยฎ System 5 Stain Sentry Fabric Protector

The cans were sold at automotive supply and detailing stores, as well as upholstery, textile, furniture and fabric stores nationwide between January 2005 and August 2010 for about $10 per can.

The CPSC recommends that consumers immediately stop using the affected products and contact Claire-Sprayway at 1-877-416-7324 for a full refund.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Pfizer continues to face Depo-Provera lawsuits from across the U.S., including one by a woman who says she learned of her brain tumor nearly 30 years after she stopped receiving the injections.
A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.
According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.