Face Paint Recall: Fun Express Children’s Face Paint Contaminated

The FDA has urged consumers to stop using Fun Express children’s face paint, as significant microbial contamination has been discovered. A number of children exposed to various colors of the face paint have experienced reactions.

The Fun Express face paint recall applies to six colors of face paint manufactured by Shanghai Color Art Stationary Company Limited, which were labeled as distributed by Oriental Trading Co., the parent company of Fun Express, Inc.

A group of children exposed to the face paint on the same day at an organized event reportedly experienced severe rashes, itchiness, burning sensations and swelling where the water-based face paint was applied.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Subsequent testing of the products by an FDA laboratory confirmed that most of the face paints were contaminated.

Although the confirmed face paint reactions reported by the FDA so far were limited to one event, the Fun Express face paints were distributed nationwide through retailers and on the internet.

The following face paints are included in the recall:

  • Fun Express Blue Face Paint – Item Number 85/2077 – UPC 8 8760048110 7
  • Fun Express Purple Face Paint – Item Number 85/2078 – UPC 8 8760048112 1
  • Fun Express Red Face Paint – Item Number 85/2079 – UPC 8 8760048114 5
  • Fun Express Orange Face Paint – Item Number 85/2080 – UPC 8 8760048116 9
  • Fun Express Black Face Paint – Item Number 85/2081 – UPC 8 8760048118 3
  • Fun Express Green Face Paint – Item Number 85/2082 – UPC 8 8760048120 6

The face paints have been removed from the market and the FDA has advised consumers to stop using them and discard any unused portion or return them to the retailer.

If a serious injury or reaction to the face paint has occurred, product liability lawyers recommend that any unused portion of the product be stored in a manner to prevent further use while preserving the face paint for testing that may be required if a lawsuit or legal claim is pursued.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Family Seeks Remand of Bard Hernia Mesh Wrongful Death Lawsuit, After Global Settlement Negotiations “Have Dragged”
Family Seeks Remand of Bard Hernia Mesh Wrongful Death Lawsuit, After Global Settlement Negotiations “Have Dragged” (Posted today)

The Bard hernia mesh lawsuit has been pending for years in the federal MDL, where family indicates global settlement negotiations have stalled, leading to a request to allow their claim to be remanded for trial.

AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit Filed Over Contaminated Water in Colorado Springs
AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit Filed Over Contaminated Water in Colorado Springs (Posted yesterday)

Lawsuit blames PFAS manufacturers for failing to prevent water contamination by their chemicals, or warn municipalities and the public about the potential risks of ulcerative colitis and other diseases as a result of exposure.

Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria
Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria (Posted 2 days ago)

Hundreds of currently pending Bard PowerPort lawsuits over infections, fractures and migration injuries were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), but now even more claims present similar allegations that the implantable port catheter system has dangerous design defects that were not adequately disclosed by the manufacturer.