MDL Sought for Apple Lawsuits Over AirTag Stalking Problems and Damages Caused By Unauthorized Tracking
Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Flame Retardants Linked to Cancer Banned from Furniture in 2014 January 2, 2014 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsNew regulations concerning flame-retardant furniture went into effect in California yesterday, leading many safety officials to speculate that the rest of the nation may soon follow suit in updating decades old standards.ย ย The new regulation means furniture sold in California is no longer required to meet the standard flammability requirements set in the 1970s. The old regulation required furniture to pass a 12-second flammability test, a precaution hoping to prevent fires from cigarettes dropped onto sofas and other flammable furniture.The new requirements, which are known as the “Flammability Standard for Upholstered Furniture/Articles Exempt from the Flammability Standard” passed by the Department of Consumer Affairs, dictates furniture must pass a test that demonstrates it does not smolder for no more than 45 minutes after being lit on fire.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe hope is that this smolder test will reduce the amount of toxic chemicals released into the environment by flame retardants currently used in furniture. These chemicals are known to cause a slew of side effects including cancer, reproductive problems and cognitive impairment.Taking effect January 1, 2014, many hopeย the law enacted in California will trigger a trickle effect for the rest of the country.ย After California first enacted the initial flame retardant regulation, the rest of the nation followed suit in the hopes to maintain a single standard, especially one which was spurred in such a highly populous state.The old regulation meant manufacturers needed to inject furniture foam with large amounts of flame retardant to meet retardancy levels. The new measure does not require manufacturers to use flame retardants.Instead, the manufacturers are called on to use fabrics that withstand exposures to heat or by lining furniture with a fire barrier, like polyester batting.Furniture companies do not have to eliminate their inventory of flame retardant furniture. Manufacturers will be allowed to sell the remaining stock until depleted. Retailers will be required to sell furniture meeting the new requirements beginning January 2015.The new regulation allows manufacturers to produce flame resistant furniture without flame retardants, but they still may use flame retardants to meet the standard. The new furniture will be tagged โTB 117-2013.โHealth Risks of Flame RetardantsPrior research has shown polybrominated diphenyl ethers, among other flame retardants, are linked to cancer, reproductive issues and lowered IQ.One study conducted on pregnant women during their second trimester of pregnancy followed their children through childhood and found women who had the highest levels of flame retardant in their blood correlated to children with behavior, cognitive impairments and hyperactivity.Other studies reveal the chemicals leach into homes through the form of dust released from the furniture foam.Critics contend banning flame retardants will not solve the problem. The toxic chemicals which cause many severe side effects are already distributed widely throughout the United States in furniture which contain the chemicals.Experts worry manufacturers will recycle the chemical-laden foam into different household products, furniture and foam which will be used for carpet padding, products which will end up right back in the homes of consumers.There are no widespread recycling programs for chemical ridden furniture. Alternatives for furniture disposal include landfills where the chemicals do not break down quickly; instead seeping back into the environment where they ย can find their way back into the food chain and living tissue, causing toxic effects. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: California, Cancer, Chemicals, FireMore Lawsuit Stories Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials August 12, 2026 MDL Sought for Apple Lawsuits Over AirTag Stalking Problems and Damages Caused By Unauthorized Tracking August 12, 2026 Recalled LINX Device Caused Recurrence of GERD Symptoms, Requiring Surgical Removal: Lawsuit August 12, 2026 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (Posted: today)C.R. Bard and its Becton Dickinson parent company face more than 3,700 Bard PowerPort lawsuits that claim the port catheters are defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026) Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials August 12, 2026
MDL Sought for Apple Lawsuits Over AirTag Stalking Problems and Damages Caused By Unauthorized Tracking August 12, 2026
Recalled LINX Device Caused Recurrence of GERD Symptoms, Requiring Surgical Removal: Lawsuit August 12, 2026
Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (Posted: today)C.R. Bard and its Becton Dickinson parent company face more than 3,700 Bard PowerPort lawsuits that claim the port catheters are defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)