Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Ford Fined $165M Over Inaccurate Recall That Was Conducted Too Slowly for Customer Safety Second-largest fine in NHTSA history came days before federal regulators announced two additional investigations into Ford recalls. November 21, 2024 Darian Hauf Add Your Comments Federal safety officials have fined Ford Motor Company $165 million, the second-largest civil penalty in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) history, for failing to comply with federal requirements regarding a recall, which did not adequately address all vehicles that may experience serious safety problems. NHTSA issued the consent order (PDF) on November 13, after the agency started an investigation into a 2021 Ford recall that did not initially include all vehicles that may experience serious risks due to defective rearview cameras, and failed to provide accurate and complete information about the scope of malfunctions that may occur. Consent orders are legal agreements that a company enters into with federal agencies, to resolve allegations regarding a company’s safety compliances and practices. Following an announcement of the $165 million fine that resolves issues stemming from the 2021 recall, the NHTSA initiated two other investigations into different recalls, which also may have failed to follow federal requirements. One investigation involves a 2024 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator seatbelt recall, which did not address problems with seatbelts in certain models that were not part of the initial recall. The other investigation involves a 2024 Ford Bronco Sport and Maverick Truck recall over a battery malfunction risks, which may cause vehicles to suddenly lose power. NHTSA has subsequently received at least 15 reports from vehicle owners who already received the recall repair, but are still experiencing problems with sudden power loss. The consent order and fine are intended to improve Ford’s compliance with recall requirements set by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. The order will remain in place for three years, with NHTSA reserving the option to extend any part of it for a fourth year. The fine is the second-largest in NHTSA’s 54-year history, behind only a $200 million Takata airbag fine, which was issued in 2015, after millions of vehicles were found to contain defective airbag inflators that may explode and send shrapnel or debris into the passenger compartment during a crash. Learn More About Airbag Recall Lawsuits Millions of Vehicles Were Recalled in 2014 Due to Exploding Airbags That Caused Injuries and Deaths. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Airbag Recall Lawsuits Millions of Vehicles Were Recalled in 2014 Due to Exploding Airbags That Caused Injuries and Deaths. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Under the order, Ford is required to review and update its recall decision-making process, improve data analysis for identifying safety defects, enhance information-sharing, and speed up recall decisions. The company will be required to build infrastructure for safety data analytics as well as a platform where all relevant information and documents concerning safety investigations will be made available. In addition, NHTSA is requiring Ford to review all recalls they have issued over the past three years and to build a test lab that focuses on low-voltage electronics, as well as investing in a vehicle identification number (VIN)-based system to track vehicle parts at the VIN level. Finally, Ford must update its Vehicle Safety Act compliance policies and meet with NHTSA quarterly. As investigations into previous recalls are conducted, consumers should stay alert for updates on recalls that may affect their vehicles. “Timely and accurate recalls are critical to keeping everyone safe on our roads,” NHTSA Deputy Administrator Sophie Shulman said in the announcement. “NHTSA is committed to ensuring manufacturers comply with the laws designed to keep our roads safe. When manufacturers fail to prioritize the safety of the American public and meet their obligations under federal law, NHTSA will hold them accountable.” Tags: Ford, Ford Bronco, Ford Expedition, Ford Maverick, Ford Recall, NHTSA Fine, Rearview Camera Image Credit: Shutterstock: Tada Images More Takata Airbag Lawsuit Stories Volkswagen Airbag Recall Impacts Nearly 115,000 Beetles and Passats November 11, 2024 BMW Recall Issued for Nearly 400K Vehicles with Airbags That May Explode July 16, 2024 Nissan Issues Do Not Drive Order for Older Pathfinder, Sentra and QX4 Models with Recalled Air Bags May 30, 2024 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: today) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025) Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025) Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)
Nissan Issues Do Not Drive Order for Older Pathfinder, Sentra and QX4 Models with Recalled Air Bags May 30, 2024
Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: today) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025)
Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)
Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)