Fracking Lawsuit Goes Before Texas Jury Over Gas Well Drilling

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson
  • 1 Comment

Trial is underway in Texas in what is being considered the first lawsuit filed over the controversial gas mining process known as hydraulic fracturing or fracking.

Aruba Petroleum faces an environmental tort lawsuit from the Parr family of Wise County, Texas, who allege that nearly two dozen hydraulic fracturing wells near their property has caused them to be exposed to toxic chemicals, industrial waste and poisonous gases.

Trial began on Tuesday and is being closely watched, as the outcome may spark a number of other lawsuits over fracking wells throughout the United States, which have been the subject of much debate about their safety.

Hydraulic fracturing is a process for getting at pockets of natural gas trapped underground. Oil and gas companies blast a secret mix of chemicals, sand, water and other substances into the ground at high pressure, fracturing the bedrock and releasing the gas for extraction. The companies have refused to release the ingredients in the chemical cocktails injected into the ground using laws to protect them from revealing company secrets.

Environmentalists, a number of lawmakers, local communities and consumer advocacy groups have expressed concerns for years that hydraulic fracturing, also known as hydrofracking, is a threat to groundwater supplies and the environment.

The Parr lawsuit was originally filed in 2011, also including Halliburton, Encana Oil & Gas and Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. as defendants. However, the Parrs settled for about $400,000 with Encana and Burlington. Halliburton convinced a judge to dismiss the claims against it in 2013, leaving only Aruba as a defendant, according to a report by

The family has been prevented from pursuing injury claims against the company, and the negligence lawsuit focuses primarily on the loss of property value due to the company’s activities and the alleged pollution and waste caused by the gas wells.

Aruba claims that the family cannot prove that their wells, among numerous others in the area, are the ones that made them sick or polluted the air, and say that the family is complaining of illnesses that were present before the wells existed.

However, some journalists and environmental activists and other observers who have been taken to the Parr property over the past several years reported being able to smell the fumes from the mining operations and claim to have suffered headaches, respiratory problems and other ailments shortly after arriving on the property. Those health issues dissipated after the observers left the vicinity of the property and the wells.

Tags: , , , , , ,

1 comment

  1. Bright as day Reply

    I lived in Wise county Texas for 13 years. The water table was contaminated by fracking back in 1988. I did not know anything about Fracking in 1999 when we had our water well installed. My family spent 13 years using this water for everything. My family has had many health problems that I believe was a direct result of this contamination. In May of 2010, a well began being installed in our next door neighbors pasture. March 25, 2011 I had a radical hysterectomy and was diagnosed with stage 2c ovarian cancer. The surgeon said I had far to much estrogen in my system making the cancer no surprise.Then in December I had sinus surgery for a clasped sinus. I very firmly believe that because benzine being an exoestrogen is one of the main chemicals and they evaporate all the chemicals in the air as part of the process of fracking, I was forced then not only to be subject to the chemicals in the water but was also breathing it. this is what I believe caused the cancer and all other health problems. We had to sell our home and move to a different state.

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.