Motion Filed to Centralize General Motors Lawsuits in MDL

|

In response to the growing number of lawsuits filed against General Motors (GM) over ignition switch problems, which have resulted in the recall of nearly 2.6 million vehicles and may have contributed to more than a dozen deaths, a request has been filed to centralize all federal litigation before one judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.  

A motion (PDF) was filed last week with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), seeking to centralize all lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system involving General Motors’ failure to disclose the existence of a dangerous and defective ignition switch in many vehicles, which could cause the cars to suddenly shut off when heavy key rings are used or if the ignition is jarred.

If the ignition switches off while the vehicle is in use, it may cause the airbags not to deploy during an accident, increasing the risk of injury or death.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

GM has admitted that it has known about the problem since 2001, and indicates that at least 13 deaths may have occurred due to airbag failures caused by the defective ignition switches. However, an independent review of accidents reported to the NHTSA suggests that hundreds of fatalities have occurred in accidents where airbags failed to deploy in vehicles that have been recalled.

Since announcing the recall in February, a number of personal injury lawsuits, wrongful death lawsuit and class action lawsuits have been filed against GM, with the litigation expected to grow over the coming months. Consolidating the cases before one judge for pretrial proceedings is designed to reduce the risk of duplicate discovery into common issues in all cases, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the courts.

The request to establish the GM recall MDL (multidistrict litigation) was filed by Katie Michelle McConnell, who indicates that the litigation should be centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The U.S. JPML is expected to schedule oral arguments on the motion for an upcoming hearing session in Chicago on May 29 or in Kansas City, Kansas on July 31.

GM Recalls

GM faces mounting criticism and government investigations in the wake of the recalls, raising serious questions about how the auto maker failed to act on known information that the vehicles had a serious safety defect.

The initial recall was limited to about 778,000 Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5s. However, the recall was later expanded to include some Saturn Ion and other vehicles. The recall was expanded again last week, raising the worldwide total to 2.59 million GM vehicles recalled due to ignition switch concerns.

Amid the increased scrutiny, GM has also announced several other recalls that are unrelated to the ignition switches, including potential engine fire risks, air bag problems, steering defects and failure to meet crash standards.

GM CEO Mary Barra went before congress twice this week to explain the company’s actions, testifying that she did not know why the recalls were not announced earlier, but promised to provide lawmakers with answers in the near future.

A congressional investigation also revealed that officials inside the NHTSA called for investigations into the problem twice since 2007, but were twice told there was no need by other officials in the agency.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuits over Ozempic and Wegovy vision loss will be consolidated for pretrial proceedings in New Jersey, separate from claims involving gastrointestinal injuries.
Former Becton Dickinson safety officer Dr. Hooman Noorchashm warns that the company’s GalaFLEX mesh is being used off-label in breast reconstruction without FDA approval, as lawsuits investigate whether the manufacturer failed to warn about its potential risks.
A series of case management conferences have been scheduled for hair relaxer litigation throughout 2026, leading up to expected bellwether trials in 2027.