Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Graco Car Seat Recall Results in Fine of Up To $10M Fine March 23, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsGraco faces fines of up to $10 million for failing to report nearly 6,000 consumer complaints involving problems with child car seats, where the buckles may fail to release and potentially cause children to become trapped in the event of an emergency.ย The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced that it was imposing a $3 million fine against Graco Children’s Products in a press release issued on March 20. The agency also warned that Graco could face an additional $7 million in fines if the company fails to spend at least the same amount improving the safety of its products.The fines come as the result of an NHTSA investigation into Graco car seat problems, including the company’s failure to provide timely warnings about seat buckle defect that resulted in the largest child seat recall in history.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe NHTSA investigation stems from almost a year-long battle with Graco, who refused and denied defect allegations for nearly 6 million child car seats.In October 2012, the NHTSA became aware of consumer complaints indicating that certain Graco car seats child safety harness buckles were becoming stuck and causing difficulty removing children from the car seats. Some reports even indicated parents had to cut the harness straps to remove children from the car seats, which could pose a serious safety risk in the event of an accident, fire or other emergency.The NHTSA consulted Graco about the potential dangers of the buckles jamming and requested the company recall those certain car seats to mitigate further dangerous situations. Graco refused to recall the car seats, forcing the agency to write an executive letter requesting the manufacturer conduct a recall, identifying more than 6,000 customer complaints of Graco baby seat buckles jamming and trapping infants in car seats.Graco finally initiated the recall of 3.7 million child car seats with jamming buckle designs on February 11, 2014.After the NHTSA further evaluated customer complaints, it recognized the same buckle design problems with certain rear-facing car seats which allowed food and liquids to enter the tracks, causing the buckles to stick and not release when pressed, posing a removal hazard from the car seat.When consulted about the similar design defect for the rear-facing car seats, Graco again refused to acknowledge the hazard to children and infants, and claimed owners should clean the harness buckles regularly to prevent jamming. On July 1, 2014, the NHTSA expanded the Graco child seat recall to include an additional 2 million rear-facing car seats.The NHTSA opened an investigation on December 1, 2014, to review the timeliness of Graco Childrenโs Products reporting of problems associated with the nearly 6 million recalled child seats.Since car seats are considered vehicle equipment products, companies are mandated by law under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act to report any known issues with the products that may cause a safety related defect within five business days to the NHTSA. Failure to report such issues can result in civil penalties upward of $35 million.The NHTSAโs investigation recovered thousands of car seat-related consumer complaints and an undisclosed number of violations to report safety hazards within the allotted time frame. Under the consent order issued on March 20, Graco officials admit they failed to provide the required defect notice.Also included in the penalties are obligations for Graco to improve its assessment and identification process for potential safety defects, create scientifically tested programs to increase effectiveness of child seat restriction programs, revise it consumer alerting program, and launch a campaign to disseminate safety messages to parents and caregivers by producing media products to incorporate in child safety campaigns. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development.More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims June 5, 2026 New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit June 5, 2026 Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claims System Failure Caused Woman To Suffer โDusky Metal Diseaseโ June 5, 2026 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026) Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 2 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026) Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 3 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims June 5, 2026
Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claims System Failure Caused Woman To Suffer โDusky Metal Diseaseโ June 5, 2026
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 2 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)
Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 3 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)