Graco Infant Car Seat Recall Issued Following NHTSA Demands

|

Graco is recalling nearly 2 million rear-facing infant car seats due to a design defect that may cause the harness buckle to become jammed, causing a delay in removing a child from the vehicle in the case of an emergency.ย 

The Graco car seat recall was announced on July 1, in response to demands by the by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which recognized that the design may allow food and drinks to enter the latch, potentially causing the buckle to become jammed.

The recall includes the following Graco rear-facing infant car seats: SnugRide and SnugRide Classic Connect manufactured from March 1, 2011 through May 31, 2013, SnugRide 30 and SnugRide Classic Connect 30 manufactured between July 1, 2010 and January 31, 2013, SnugRide 35 and SnugRide Classic Connect 35 manufactured between May 1, 2011 and January 31, 2013, SnugRide Click Connect 40 manufactured between June 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012, and Aprica A30 models manufactured from July 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Customers can locate the model name, number and manufacture date information on a white label underneath or behind the car seat.

The recalled infant car seats were manufactured in China under Graco Childrenโ€™s Products INC., of Exton, PA andย were sold at juvenile stores nationwide.

This is Gracoโ€™s second major recall this year, following a toddler car seat recall in February that affected 3.7 million forward facing car seats. The current rear-facing car seat recall stems from the February recall.

At that time, the NHTSA asked Graco to recall all car seats with the specific harness buckle design, but Graco refused, stating the rear-facing car seats could be removed without unharnessing the child. However, following five months of negotiations, the company finally agreed to the NHTSA’s demands.

Additionally, Graco has come under scrutiny lately as Consumer Reports released the findings of their field tests on certain Graco strollers, calling four of their models โ€œDo Not Buysโ€ and โ€œSafety Risksโ€. The field test results indicated the braking systems that are designed to lock the wheels may break, posing a roll-away hazard, particularly on inclines. Consumer Reports stated the brakes are not rigorously designed and rely on thin plastic teeth to lock the wheels.

The company recommends that customers with recalled car seats contact Graco at 1-877-766-7470 or visit them online at www.gracobucklerecall@gracobaby.com to receive a free replacement harness buckle.

Russell Maas
Written by: Russell Maas

Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist

Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโ€™s leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโ€™s editorial strategy, including SEO and content development.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.
A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.
A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโ€™s responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.