IVC Filter Removal Complications Can Be Reduced By Doctors Actively Monitoring Patients, Study Indicates
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Greenfield Vena Cava Filter Lawsuit Filed Against Boston Scientific Over Perforation January 30, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Boston Scientific faces a product liability lawsuit brought by the family of Ohio woman, which alleges that problems with a Greenfield Vena Cava filter caused severe internal injuries and death. The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on January 12, by Julia and Raylyn Ratliff, administrators of the estate of Cinthia K. Ratliff. Ratliff had the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter implanted in April 2004, for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The small, spider-like filter is designed to “catch” blood clots that may break free, preventing them from traveling to the lungs and causing a pulmonary embolism. Learn More About IVC Filter Lawsuits Design Problems with Certain IVC Filters Linked to Severe Injuries. Lawsuits Reviewed Nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About IVC Filter Lawsuits Design Problems with Certain IVC Filters Linked to Severe Injuries. Lawsuits Reviewed Nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION According to allegations raised in the wrongful death lawsuit, design defects with the Boston Scientific Greenfield Vena Cava filter caused the device to fail and perforate her vena cava, resulting in severe internal bleeding, from which Ratliff died on May 3, 2013. According to an autopsy performed, the immediate cause of death was determined to be “Perforation of Inferior Vena Cava by Greenfield Filter with Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage.” The family indicates that Boston Scientific knew or should have known that its Greenfield Vena Cava filter posed a risk of breaking free from its implantation site, migrating, perforating the vena cava and causing serious injury or death, according to the complaint. IVC Filter Long-Term Risks Amid hundreds of adverse event problems involving problems with retrievable IVC filters, the FDA issued a warning in August 2010, urging doctors to remove the devices once the danger of a pulmonary embolism has passed. One of the most common complications reported by the FDA involved IVC filters fracturing or breaking, allowing small pieces to migrating through the patient’s body and pose a potentially life-threatening risk. In May 2014, the FDA issued an updated safety statement indicating that patients may face an increased risk of problems with IVC filters the longer they remain in place, advising doctors that the ideal time for removal appears to be between 29 days and 54 days after implantation. A study published in the medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine in March 2013 raised questions about the effectiveness of IVC filters, indicating that less than 10% of filters evaluated in the study were successfully removed from patients and 8% of recipients of IVC filters suffered a pulmonary embolism despite the device’s presence. The Boston Scientific lawsuit over the Greenfield Vena Cava filter joins a growing number of claims brought against manufacturers of IVC filters in recent years, alleging similar design defects with products like the Bard Recovery IVC Filter, Bard G2 IVC Filter, and Cook Celect or Gunther Tulip IVC Filters. Amid a growing number of complaints filed against Cook Medical, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an order in October, consolidated all Cook IVC filter lawsuits pending throughout the federal court system before U.S. District Judge Richard L. Young in the Southern District of Indiana. Tags: Boston Scientific, IVC Filter, Ohio, Wrongful Death Lawsuit Image Credit: | More IVC Filter Lawsuit Stories Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Verdict of $3.3M Upheld By Appeals Court August 16, 2023 IVC Filter Removal Complications Can Be Reduced By Doctors Actively Monitoring Patients, Study Indicates March 24, 2023 IVC Filter Risks Do Not Negate Benefits for Preventing Blood Clots: Study March 14, 2023 68 Comments Helen October 19, 2015 I had after cancer surgery a PE they put an ivc filter in. So far it is still in place. I asked after the coma regarding if they can travel or fall apart and hospital staff ensured me they were very safe. A freind told me about the recent lawsuits. I have been getting over the last few years chest x rays, which will show the tiny filter and you can count if all his tiny legs are still attached. I try to not crush it, nt to bend to far, no trauma to the chest and be very carful. I also take a baby aspirin, and have to be for the rest of my life on I urban to keep my lungs working. Hope this post helps somebody. Chest x rays will show the filter Antonio October 18, 2015 I have had 2 clods 1 n my legs and n my lungs I have had the Greenfield filter put n 2008 just now hearing about these problems Kim October 16, 2015 I had my greenfield filter put in in 1997. I was in a coma for a month and my lungs kept collapsing so I guess they had no hesitation at that time. A few months ago I saw on the news that there were lawsuits against Bard filters. I got concerned. My sister is a nurse and said it’d be more dangerous to remove it. I don’t know, I’ll probably look into getting it checked to see if it’s moved. I’ve never had any problems though Cheryl October 14, 2015 I had the Greenfield filter put in in 2012 and after that immediately I had pains in my left thigh, and ever since have had a hard time walking it’s like one leg is longer than the other. Plus I am on Zarylto(spelling wrong and I have had 1 clot in each lung even after having that put in. I still have a lot of pain and I need to stop the Zarylto because I could bleed to death. Mike October 13, 2015 Mine has been in place since 2003. It appears that the Greenfield IVC manufactured before March 10, 2004 was included in a FDA Class I Recall. Class I is the most urgent recall. I knew nothing about this until I saw ads on TV about class action lawsuits and started researching it on the web. I’m not sure, but I don’t believe that the Greenfield IVC is included in the lawsuit. However, I’m definitely going to talk to my doctor about it. Barbara October 2, 2015 I had a Greenfield ivc filter placed in 2011. I had multiple PE’s DVT’s arm leg lungs aortic track. I also have ITP which caused a SAH. I WAS GIVEN A NEW DRUG CALLED N-Plate which caused all the blood clots. The filter was placed just before a large clot broke loose in my leg. It plugged the ivc filter which caused me to have compartment syndrome. I had a double fasciotomy done to my right leg which I now have to wear a custom made hose for life as well as be on warfarin for life. Dangerous drug when you have ITP. Now this with the filter which I still have. No one has checked it since it was placed. What should I do now. Ellen September 15, 2015 I’ve had a Greenfield Filter since 1996. I’ve had numerious DVT’s and a Massive Pulmunary Embolism. Now recently I was in the hospital with an Hemotoma the size of a softball on my right kidney. When the filter was put in they were supposed to check and make sure it was still in place. They have only checked it once in 19yrs. My Sister is in Florida she sent me info about a class action law suit against these type of filters. i fully plan on calling tomorrow to see if the Greenfield filter in included in this lawsuit . The worst they can tell me is no. If your curious type in Greenfield Filter and you’ll see info from January of 2015. It has me scared a lot. The funny thing is the Dr who put it in swore the thing was safe. Hopefully I get some peace of mind soon about this stupid filter one way or the other. Sharon September 8, 2015 I had a greenfield filter placed in 1999 December, prior to gastric bypass. I asked the hospital for the card to carry that stated what kind of filter and the company name twice, with out getting it. Surgery,bypass, was Jan. 2000, I was doing well when in July ,2000, I went to hospital with deep vein thrombosis, and two small clots to my lung. I told them how many clots had gone there and that it was my left lung wich they concured. I always thought that I was grateful for the filter but now I wonder? Why would they not give me the card and why did they not take the filter out later. ARCHIE September 4, 2015 MY FILTER HAS BEEN IN SINCE 1998. I HAVE BREAKING PROBLEMS. PAIN IN LEFT SHOULD AND LEGS ARE SWOTTEN Melissa September 4, 2015 Currently, I have a non-removable IVC Greenfield Filter. This is a recalled filter. This was placed in 2005 during a hospital stay for a DVT. All together I’ve had 4 blood clots; 2 Pulmonary Embolisms, 1 DVT, and a blood clot in my right hand. The 2 PE’s occurred prior to the placement of the filter. According to a recent study, my filter is now tilted and has a chronic blood clot between the filter and vein wall. I wasn’t made aware, at the time it was implanted, that this is a non-retrievable filter; nor was I educated on the types of filters available. It was rushed. When the DVT occurred, I had an 8.1 INR; that is 5.1 higher then what it was supposed to be. My blood was so thin, yet I was told that I was still clotting, (which is why I had a DVT); they said this was highly unusual – they had to give me plasma in order to place the filter. My doctor, back then, did not monitor my Warfarin intake; which is why my blood was so thin. I had to demand to be admitted to the hospital. My doctor argued that my lungs didn’t show sign of a pulmonary emboli, and that my air saturation was normal. I continued to tell him that I knew I had a DVT, told him my symptoms, and informed him that if I wasn’t admitted it could become a PE. He had the hospital look at me, and of course I was diagnosed with a DVT. I’m not sure if I have to wait until something bad happens in order to take action; but it’s scary knowing that it’s tilting and that it is moving. 🙁 Jennifer September 4, 2015 Please look up dr. William Kuo out of Stanford hospital intentional radiology He was able to successfully remove imbedded greenfield IVC filters I highly recommend as he developed the technique to remove permanent filters. James August 24, 2015 I’ve had a Greenfield since 2006. I’ve recently experienced pain from the bottom of my left knee going downward and bruising in the area. I can’t help but to be a little worried after reading this article ! Jonah August 20, 2015 I’ve had one since 1995. The doctor’s say I’m fine… derp 🙂 Lisa August 14, 2015 I’ve had mine since May 1996 also….been having health issues…… andy July 28, 2015 I have one since 97 and I have been,told it moved Holly July 12, 2015 I have had a greenfield filter since 1999. This is very disturbing to think about 🙁 Karen June 30, 2015 I have had one since 1994 – this is the first I have heard of a problem.:( Michael June 23, 2015 I have a greenfield vena cava filter and I am scared because It has been since 1996 Newer Comments 1 2 Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Lawsuit Sign Ups Expected To Continue as First Brain Tumor Cases Prepared for Trial (Posted: yesterday) After a growing body of evidence has linked use of the Depo-Provera birth control shot to an increased risk of brain tumors, thousands of women nationwide are seeking information on how to sign up for the Depo-Provera lawsuit. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITCourt Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (05/15/2025)Depo Shot Lawsuit Filed Over Serious Brain Tumor Injuries (05/07/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Migraines, Headaches Led to Meningioma Brain Tumor Diagnosis (05/01/2025) Lawyers To Select 50 Suboxone Dental Lawsuits for Next Phase of MDL Bellwether Discovery (Posted: 2 days ago) As lawyers continue to review records on more than 500 Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits, the MDL judge has outlined the process for identifying a smaller group that will move into the next discovery phase. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUIT500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (04/24/2025)Status of Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits To Be Reviewed at MDL Conference (04/16/2025)Prenatal Opioid Exposure May Result in Smaller Brains Among Newborns: Study (04/14/2025) Hair Relaxer Lawsuits MDL Judge Seeks Status Report on Discovery Proceedings (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge wants lawyers involved in hair relaxer lawsuits to provide an update this week on the status of discovery proceedings for a pool of cases being considered for bellwether trial dates. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITFormaldehyde Found in Range of Personal Care Products Used Primarily by Black and Latina Women (05/14/2025)Lawyers Selected 32 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits for Bellwether Discovery in MDL (05/13/2025)Hair Relaxer Settlement Master Appointed To Oversee Negotiations To Resolve Cancer Lawsuits (04/29/2025)
IVC Filter Removal Complications Can Be Reduced By Doctors Actively Monitoring Patients, Study Indicates March 24, 2023
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Sign Ups Expected To Continue as First Brain Tumor Cases Prepared for Trial (Posted: yesterday) After a growing body of evidence has linked use of the Depo-Provera birth control shot to an increased risk of brain tumors, thousands of women nationwide are seeking information on how to sign up for the Depo-Provera lawsuit. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITCourt Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (05/15/2025)Depo Shot Lawsuit Filed Over Serious Brain Tumor Injuries (05/07/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Migraines, Headaches Led to Meningioma Brain Tumor Diagnosis (05/01/2025)
Lawyers To Select 50 Suboxone Dental Lawsuits for Next Phase of MDL Bellwether Discovery (Posted: 2 days ago) As lawyers continue to review records on more than 500 Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits, the MDL judge has outlined the process for identifying a smaller group that will move into the next discovery phase. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUIT500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (04/24/2025)Status of Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits To Be Reviewed at MDL Conference (04/16/2025)Prenatal Opioid Exposure May Result in Smaller Brains Among Newborns: Study (04/14/2025)
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits MDL Judge Seeks Status Report on Discovery Proceedings (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge wants lawyers involved in hair relaxer lawsuits to provide an update this week on the status of discovery proceedings for a pool of cases being considered for bellwether trial dates. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITFormaldehyde Found in Range of Personal Care Products Used Primarily by Black and Latina Women (05/14/2025)Lawyers Selected 32 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits for Bellwether Discovery in MDL (05/13/2025)Hair Relaxer Settlement Master Appointed To Oversee Negotiations To Resolve Cancer Lawsuits (04/29/2025)