Gun Maker Lawsuit Over Fatal Shooting Results in $600K Settlement

Kahr Arms has agreed to pay about $600,000 to settle a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of a man who was shot to death by a drug-addicted worker who took a gun from the company’s factory. 

The gun maker was sued by the Brady Center on behalf of the family of Danny Guzman, who was killed on Christmas Eve in 1999 by Mark Cronin, a drug addict and Kahr employee. The center also brought charges on behalf of Armando Maisonet, who was wounded by Cronin during the same shooting.

According to allegations raised in the complaint, Cronin was hired by Kahr Arms despite a criminal record of violence, theft and drug abuse.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Guzman and Maisonet were shot at a Worcester, Massachusetts nightclub. The murder weapon, a 9 mm pistol, was found six days later, loaded, by a four-year-old child behind an apartment building, according to a press release issued by the Brady Center.

The lawsuit claimed that not only did Kahr not perform a background check before hiring employees to work in a gun factory, but accused the company of having non-existent security on its products. Cronin told police that he could take guns from the Worcester, Massachusetts factory whenever he liked before they had serial numbers stamped on them. Police confirmed that removing guns from the facility would be easy due to Kahr Arms poor record-keeping.

According to the Brady Center, the settlement is the largest ever paid by a gun manufacturer accused of negligence linked to the use of its products. The settlement came after Kahr Arms failed to have the case dismissed.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Plaintiffs Seek To Dismiss Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Involving Women Not Diagnosed with Uterine, Endometrial or Ovarian Cancer
Plaintiffs Seek To Dismiss Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Involving Women Not Diagnosed with Uterine, Endometrial or Ovarian Cancer (Posted yesterday)

A motion filed by plaintiffs involved in hair relaxer lawsuits calls for cases not involving uterine, ovarian or endometrial cancer to be dismissed from the litigation, with the option for the women to file again in the future if they are diagnosed with one of those three forms of cancer caused by hair relaxers.