Injectafer Iron Infusion Caused To Critically Low Phosphate Levels: Lawsuit

|

A Florida woman indicates she suffered severely low phosphate levels after receiving an Injectafer iron infusion, according to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit against Daiich Sankyo and other drug makers.

The complaint (PDF) was filed late last month by Alice Oakley in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, indicating the intravenous injection administered to treat iron deficiency carries serious side effects which were not adequately disclosed by the drug maker.

Injectafer (ferric carboxymaltose) was introduced by Daiichi Sankyo in 2013, as an iron infusion for adults with anemia, who are not able to be treated with an oral iron supplement and have non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease. However, side effects of Injectafer have ben linked to reports of serious and life-threateningly low phosphorous levels, known as severe hypophosatemia (HPP).

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Oakley indicates she suffered from iron deficiency anema (IDA) since about 2006, and was prescribed Injectafer iron infusions in April 2019. After three injections, each about one week apart, she began to suffer critically low levels of phosphorous. As a result, she was treated in the emergency room, where she was given IV phosphate infusion, but her phosphate levels remained unstable and she was ultimately diagnosed with severe hypophatemia, which has left her with severe and permanent injuries, according to the complaint.

Oakley’s lawsuit names Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., American Regent, Inc. Daiichi Sankyo, and Vifor Pharmaceuticals Management as defendants, indicating the companies knew for years that Injectafer could cause severe hypophosphatemia, or Severe HPP, but failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers or the medical community.

“Defendants at no times have attempted to warn users of these risks and have therefore violated their duties to warn and not misrepresent the benefits of a drug,” according to the complaint. “Defendants also have a duty to explain to the medical community how to properly investigate and monitor sharp drops in phosphorous levels. Defendants at no time have provided such warnings.”

The case joins a growing number of other Injectafer lawsuits filed in recent months, each involving similar allegations of severe drops in phosphate levels linked to side effects of the iron infusion.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women across the U.S. are now pursuing product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims to secure compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects linked to the use of Depo-Provera.
A Texas mother is pursuing a lawsuit against Roblox and Discord, claiming the design of the apps allow sexual predators to access and groom young children.
Federal regulators are investigating whether Dupixent increases the risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), after more than 300 adverse event reports flagged cancer diagnoses among users. The FDA’s review comes as lawsuits are being pursued nationwide, alleging Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn that the blockbuster eczema drug could either trigger or mask the rare blood cancer.