Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Coating on Intravascular Devices May Peel Off, Causing Injury and Death, FDA Warns November 24, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Government health officials have issued a warning about the potential dangers associated with use of intravascular devices with hydrophilic or hydrophobic lubricious coatings, after data suggest there may be over 500 incidents of coating separations resulting in injuries and at least nine deaths since 2014.ย The FDA issued a safety communication on intravascular medical devices on November 23, warning healthcare professionals using coated intravascular medical devices on patients to be aware of the potential for the coating to separate from the device. Incidents of coating separation have been linked to serious adverse health consequences, including blockage of blood vessels, heart attacks, strokes, and death. Do You Know about… Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The intravascular devices, include intravascular catheters, guidewires, balloon angioplasty catheters, delivery sheaths and implant delivery systems, are typically used during minimally invasive surgeries on cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and peripheral vascular systems. Many of these devices are covered in a hydrophilic or hydrophobic lubricious coating to reduce the friction between the devices and the blood vessels. The coatings allow for greater maneuverability by the physician and have been determined to cause fewer traumas to the blood vessels. However, a recent analysis of FDA adverse event reports found hundreds of incidents involving injuries and death that were caused by the separation of device coating during procedures. The FDA warns that the coating could separate from the device by means of peeling, flaking, shedding, delaminating, or sloughing off, leaving remains inside the blood vessels of the patient. The coating separations could occur for a number of reasons; including patientโs anatomy, physicianโs technique, improper storage, use of the wrong device or a device defect from the manufacturer. FDA investigators found more than 500 incidents of coating separation on intravascular medical devices since January 1, 2014. According to the FDA, the majority of incident reports involved coated guidewires and resulted in a range of serious and life threatening injuries. Of the 500 reported incidents, researchers found a wide variety of injuries including pulmonary embolism, pulmonary infarction, myocardial embolism, myocardial infarction, embolic stroke, and tissue necrosis. A total of eleven deaths were reported, although investigators decided that two of the deaths were not linked to coating separation. However, the remaining nine deaths involved situations that included embolization of separated device coatings that caused severe blood vessel occlusion during brain and heart catheterizations. Although the reports have not determined the deaths to be directly cause by the embolization of particles, the separated pieces ultimately contributed to the fatal heart attacks and brain bleeds. Over the last five years there have been at least 11 recalls of medical devices equipped with coatings that reportedly peeled or flaked of the of the devices during use. Despite the injuries and recalls, the FDA warning indicates that the agency still believes the benefit of the coated devices outweighs the risks, and that without these devices, some patients may be forced to undergo more extensive and invasive surgeries which tend to have longer recoveries and put patients at more risk of infections. The FDAโs warning does not indicate any specific manufacturerโs product is better or safer to use than anotherโs, but does suggest that healthcare professionals take into consideration the purpose of the device used, storage and labeling information of devices, execution of multiple devices together, and pre- and post-surgery monitoring of patients before taking action. Written by: Russell Maas Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Catheter, Medical Device, Particulate Matter, Pulmonary Embolism More Lawsuit Stories Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain April 3, 2026 Lawsuit Claims Covidien Hernia Mesh Perforated Manโs Bowel April 3, 2026 Judge Upholds $9M Crock-Pot Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Verdict April 3, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (Posted: 2 days ago) An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026) Court Outlines Plan To Prepare Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits for Trial in Early 2028 (Posted: 3 days ago) Four Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits will eventually be selected and prepared for bellwether trials set to begin in March 2028, according to a court order. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Film Lawsuit Filed by 46 Users Alleging Drug Makers Ignored Years of Dental Injury Reports (03/03/2026)100 Suboxone Film Tooth Decay Lawsuits Selected for Next Phase of Bellwether Discovery (02/13/2026)Problems With Suboxone Dental Injury Records Collection Continues in MDL (01/26/2026) Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)
Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (Posted: 2 days ago) An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)
Court Outlines Plan To Prepare Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits for Trial in Early 2028 (Posted: 3 days ago) Four Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits will eventually be selected and prepared for bellwether trials set to begin in March 2028, according to a court order. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Film Lawsuit Filed by 46 Users Alleging Drug Makers Ignored Years of Dental Injury Reports (03/03/2026)100 Suboxone Film Tooth Decay Lawsuits Selected for Next Phase of Bellwether Discovery (02/13/2026)Problems With Suboxone Dental Injury Records Collection Continues in MDL (01/26/2026)
Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)