Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
FDA Deciding Whether to Remove JUUL Vaping Products From U.S. Market: NYT July 6, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFederal regulators are expected to decide in September whether to remove JUUL vaping pods from the market, following concerns about teen nicotine addiction and illegal marketing of the products.According to a report in the The New York Times, JUUL has submitted a 125,000-page application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as part of an attempt to convince the agency about the benefits provided by the e-cigarettes for smokers trying to quit, arguing that those benefits outweigh the teen vaping epidemic that JUUL pods have sparked over the past decade.The FDA has a September 9 deadline to determine whether the devices are more of a health benefit or health threat.LEARN MORE ABOUTVAPE PEN AND E-CIG LAWSUITSSerious lung injuries, respiratory illnesses, and nicotine addiction have been linked to a wide range of vaping products, including e-cigarettes and THC vape pens. Lawsuits are being pursued against manufacturers for failing to warn users about these risks.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONLearn More AboutVAPE PEN AND E-CIG LAWSUITSSerious lung injuries, respiratory illnesses, and nicotine addiction have been linked to a wide range of vaping products, including e-cigarettes and THC vape pens. Lawsuits are being pursued against manufacturers for failing to warn users about these risks.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe decision comes as more than 4,500 JUUL lawsuits are currently being pursued against the company by individuals, school districts and municipalities, each involving similar allegations that the e-cigarette manufacturer caused a new generation of teens and young adults to become addicted to nicotine by encouraging minors or prior non-smokers to use their vaping products.JUUL pods were just introduced in 2015, and quickly became the most popular form of nicotine exposure among teens and young adults in the United States.Marketing efforts by the manufacturer have been blamed for fuelingย teen vaping problems in communities nationwide, which has caused widespread disruption in schools, additional costs for local municipalities and left young adults addicted to high levels of nicotine in each JUUL pod, often leading to smoking and long-term health concerns.In July 2019, a U.S. District Court in Maryland ordered that applications for tobacco products, such as e-cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, and hookah tobacco, that were on the market as of August 8, 2016, must be submitted to FDA no later than May 12, 2020. However, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline was extended in April through September 9, 2021.By the deadline, manufacturers are required to submit for approval on how they intend to market their products in a way that discourages teen and underage use.The JUUL vape pens were intentionally designed to look like USB drives, allowing teens to hide their vaping habit from parents and school officials. The pods were also sold in a variety of candy-like flavors intended to appeal to prior non-smokers, and the manufacturer targeted teens through social media and other efforts that failed to disclose the high levels of nicotine, which may cause life-long addiction problems.As the FDA has tightened restrictions and forced JUUL to remove many of the flavors most popular with teens, the companyโs sales have plummeted, according to the New York Times report. Sales have dropped by about $500 million, and the company has shuttered operations in 14 countries. It is now valued at under $5 billion, after reaching a prior high of nearly $40 billion.If the FDA rejects its application and recalls JUUL from the market, many observers say that would likely be the end of JUUL Labs as a company.As part of its push to convince the FDA to allow JUUL pods to stay on the market, the company reportedly paid $51,000 to buy the May/June issue of the American Journal of Health Behavior in order to get the journal to publish 11 studies, funded by JUUL and conducted by scientists paid by JUUL, which tout the benefits of the vaping devices in helping smokers quit. The company even shelled out an additional $6,500 to get the journal to give free access to the studies.As a result, three of the journalโs editorial board members resigned in protest, according to the report.In addition, JUUL agreed last month to pay $40 million to settle a lawsuit by North Carolina which accused the company of purposefully marketing its products to children. The agreement stops a pending trial from going forward, which could have had testimony from nicotine-addicted children, parents, and schoolteachers struggling to combat the vaping epidemic in their schools being seen by the FDA and the public just as the agency was considering the companyโs application.School districts and other government entities say JUUL devastated their communities, classrooms and budgets by addicting children in those schools and communities to a device which appeared designed to foster addiction in children.FDA officials say their decision will be based on sound science. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Children, E-Cigarettes, Juul, Nicotine, VapingMore JUUL E-Cigarette Vape Lawsuit Stories More Than Half of U.S. Teens Who Vape Do So To Deal With Stress, Anxiety: Study November 18, 2024 On-Line Retailers Receive FDA Warning Letter Over Illegal Sale of Disposable E-Cigarettes May 7, 2024 Vaping Causes Same DNA Damage as Smoking, Study Finds April 12, 2024 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (Posted: today)Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (05/19/2026) Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026) Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 4 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)
On-Line Retailers Receive FDA Warning Letter Over Illegal Sale of Disposable E-Cigarettes May 7, 2024
Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (Posted: today)Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (05/19/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 4 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)