Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
LIFEPAK 1000 Defibrillators May Shut Down During Use, FDA Warns March 9, 2017 Russell Maas Add Your Comments A Class I recall has been issued for more than 50,000 LIFEPAK defibrillators, following dozens of reports that suggest certain devices may fail to deliver lifesaving electrical shocks to individuals suffering cardiac arrest.ย The FDA announced a LIFEPAK 1000 defibrillator recall on March 8, indicating that the action poses a risk of serious injury or death. At least 34 reports have been received indicating that the defibrillator unexpectedly shut down during emergency shock treatments, due to insufficient electrical contacts on the batteries. The LIFEPAK 1000 defibrillators are designed to deliver lifesaving electrical shocks to people with sudden cardiac arrest, which is a medical condition in which the heart suddenly stops beating. The defibrillators have electrodes that are attached to a patient, which analyze the patientโs heart rhythm and deliver an electrical shock to restore normal heart rhythm when necessary. The devices are used in the medical field by trained professionals and commonly by medical emergency first responders. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION On January 13, 2017, Physio-Control released an โUrgent Medical Device Correctionโ letter to all affected customers, warning medical professionals of the potential power loss the devices may experience. The announcement this week categorized this action as a Class I recall, which is the most serious type. According to the urgent medical notice, after learning about the reports of problems with LIFEPAK 1000 defibrillators, the manufacturing company, Physio-Control, immediately conducted a field investigation and found the โintermittent connection is a result of wear and subsequent oxidation formation between the battery and device electrical contacts.โ After performing their field investigation, the company warned the FDA that if the devices are exposed to excessive vibration, or have had a battery installed that has not been replaced or removed from the device over a long period of time, the unexpected power failures are likely to occur, placing patients who suffer cardiac arrest in potentially fatal situations. In the event a patient who has entered into cardiac arrest is delayed or unable to receive the electrical shock to restore their heart beat rhythm due to unexpected power failures, the patient could suffer serious injury such as permanent organ damage, brain injury or death. The recall affects an estimated 50,046 LIFEPAK 1000 defibrillators marked with Part Number 320371500XX. More than 133,330 serial numbers are included in the worldwide recall. Customers may search for their defibrillators serial number by visiting http://www.physio-control.com/Search_Affected_Devices.aspx. The recalled defibrillators were manufactured by Physio-Control of Redmond, Washington, whose parent company is Stryker Corporation. The defibrillators were manufactured from June 30, 2006 to December 20, 2016 and were distributed to medical facilities and medical professionals from June 30, 2006 to December 23, 2016. Customers are being asked to follow the instructions sent by Physio-Control on the urgent medical notice which instruct users to immediately remove the battery and ensure the terminal connectors are clear and implement a weekly battery removal and reinstallation process to prevent oxidation buildups. Customers who have followed these protocols and still experience unexpected power failures are being asked to replace the battery with a spare and call Physio-Control immediately at 1-866-231-1220 to arrange for servicing the device. Written by: Russell Maas Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Cardiac Arrest, Defibrillator, LIFEPAK, Medical Device Recall, Stryker More Lawsuit Stories Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week March 12, 2026 Enfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects March 12, 2026 Stainless Steel Apple Watch Bandโ Lawsuit Filed Over Burn Injury Risks March 12, 2026 1 Comments Ivan March 15, 2021 I had lifepak 1000,since 2009.Thank God, did not have to shock anyone. I am a 40 year paramedic and would not forgive myself. Physio control corrected in 2018 but 9 years of potential failure is unforgivable. EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026) Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Enfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects March 12, 2026
Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)
Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)