Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Macy’s Takes Steps to Ensure Furniture Flame Retardant Chemicals No Longer Used October 22, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsFollowing intense pressure from environmental activists, Macyโs has publicly announced their commitment to discontinue the use of carcinogens and toxic flame retardants in furniture, due to adverse health consequences consumers may face from chemical exposure.ย Environmental activist group, Safer Chemical, Healthy families, issued a press releaseย on October 20, announcing that Macyโs Inc. has agreed to stop using harmful fire prevention chemicals in sofas and other furniture pieces across the nation, after the group waged several petitions and campaigns against the retailer.To be compliant with fire prevention risks, retailers followed regulations that require furniture to be injected with large amounts of chemical based flame retardants to pass a 12-second flammability test, a precaution hoping to prevent fires from cigarettes dropped onto sofas and other flammable furniture.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONIn January, California challenged this regulation and as a result the โFlammability Standard for Upholstered Furniture/Articles Exempt from the Flammability Standardโ was passed by the Department of Consumer Affairs, dictating that furniture must pass a test that demonstrates it will not smolder for more than 45 minutes after being lit on fire.According to the Department of Consumer Affairs, the new regulation and preventative test will prevent harmful carcinogens from being added to furniture and prevent the chemicals from being released into the air of homes if a fire is started.California adopted this new practice in January and environmental agencies, both governmental and independent, across the nation have encouraged the rest of the nation to follow suit.According to Safer Chemicals, Healthy families, Macyโs Inc. responded to the activists recent Mind the Store campaign, which advocated for furniture retailers across the nation to phase out unnecessary toxic chemicals in flame retardants.Macyโs response to the campaign, which brought in thousands of supporting emails from consumers, stated that the company did not believe any of its suppliers were still using harmful fire prevention chemicals, but would verify and instruct any remaining suppliers to cease doing so.“We thank and congratulate Macy’s for taking this big step to make all sofas safe. This is an important victory for our Mind the Store campaign and millions of Macy’s customers nationwide,” said Mind the Store campaign director Mike Schade. “We urge the remaining retailers who have not acted, like Pier 1 Imports, to follow suit and phase out these unnecessary toxic chemicals once and for all.”Macy’s competitors, such as Wal-Mart, Ikea-Group, and Ashley Furniture Industries Inc., have already taken similar actions. In addition to the furniture industry, retailers such as Home Depot Inc. and Loweโs Cos. both announced they would be phasing out vinyl flooring with potentially toxic phthalates. Schade said that the group will continue pressuring other retailers such as Pier 1 Imports, Rooms to Go, and Berkshire Hathawayโs furniture stores.The groupโs major concern for phasing out the chemicals placed in flame retardant filled furniture is the potential side effects to consumers. Several studies have linked the flame retardants to cancer, brain damage, developmental disabilities, and cognitive impairment in children. Pregnant women have been observed to have dangerous levels of the chemicals in their blood due to breathing in the dust released from the chemical filled furniture.In February 2015, a study published in the Journal of Reproductive Immunology found that women with higher levels of flame retardants in their blood were more likely to give birth to a premature baby. The side effects from premature births can be include respiratory problems, brain hemorrhage, cerebral palsy, heart, problems, hearing loss and many other serious and sometimes fatal conditions. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Cancer, Chemicals, Fire, Flame Retardants Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-79547p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Stuart Monk</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>More Lawsuit Stories Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots April 9, 2026 Information on Paraquat Settlement Offers To Be Provided to Special Master, MDL Judge Orders April 9, 2026 Samsung Phone Battery Lawsuit Alleges Thermal Runaway Caused Severe Burns April 9, 2026 1 Comments Al May 18, 2016 I’ve had a sofa from Macy’s for a year and to this day the sofa causes my eyes to water and burn. No one can sit on the sofa for more than 30 minutes at a time without it causing a headache and watery eyes. What kind of chemicals were used?!?! CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (Posted: today)AngioDynamics faces a Vortex port lawsuit from a woman who says the device only lasted a month before causing an infection and dangerous blood clots in her neck.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Defects Caused Sepsis, Pulmonary Embolism (03/23/2026)Chemotherapy Injection Port Lawsuit Blames AngioDynamics SmartPort for Wrongful Death (03/13/2026)Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (03/06/2026) Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: yesterday)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026) 10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (04/01/2026)Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)
Information on Paraquat Settlement Offers To Be Provided to Special Master, MDL Judge Orders April 9, 2026
Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (Posted: today)AngioDynamics faces a Vortex port lawsuit from a woman who says the device only lasted a month before causing an infection and dangerous blood clots in her neck.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Defects Caused Sepsis, Pulmonary Embolism (03/23/2026)Chemotherapy Injection Port Lawsuit Blames AngioDynamics SmartPort for Wrongful Death (03/13/2026)Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (03/06/2026)
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: yesterday)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)
10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (04/01/2026)Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)