Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
Medtronic InSync III Pacemaker Recall Issued Due to Defective Battery Risk December 9, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Almost 100,000 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Pacemakers distributed globally by Medtronic are being recalled, after reports suggest the device batteries may put out less power than necessary to activate them in case of a medical emergency. A Medtronic InSync III pacemaker recall was announced by the FDA, after the manufacturer received at least 30 confirmed reports of battery malfunctions. If the pacemaker battery fails, the device may not receive necessary power to function properly. At least one death has been linked to the Medtronic pacemaker problems, but it has not been confirmed whether the battery malfunction was a contributing factor. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION CRT Pacemakers are implantable devices positioned under the skin and just below the collarbone. The devices are designed to assist the heart’s pumping action to treat fast, irregular, or slow heart rhythms, by applying small electric pulses to both sides of the heart to keep the left and right chambers beating in proper sync. The devices are also used to treat patients susceptible to heart failure by improving the body’s ability to pump blood and distribute oxygen. The Medtronic InSync III pacemakers have been recalled due to the potential failure of the batteries to supply sufficient power for electric pulse therapies to the patient’s heart. Without the ability for the device to deliver electric pulse therapies, patients with heart disabilities may not be able to rely on the pacemaker in the event of a medical emergency, which could lead to serious injury and death. According to the FDA, Medtronic sent an Urgent Medical Device Correction letter last month to all affected customers urging patients with implanted devices to meet with their healthcare providers immediately to re-evaluate follow-up frequency for better monitoring. Medtronic announced in the notice that the issue cannot be mitigated by any sort of programming changes and due to the unpredictable nature, it is not possible to identify if a device is at a failing stage unless an emergency occurs, which could be too late. The root cause of the battery issue is undetermined at this time, but Medtronic indicates that it believes it could be the result of unexpected high battery impedance. Due to the company’s inability to correct the devices, Medtronic indicates that healthcare professionals should assess whether individuals should continue using the recalled devices under increased monitoring or have replacement surgery, depending on the patients’ health risks. Of the 97,000 Medtronic InSync III pacemakers distributed on the market, an estimated 22,000 of the battery powered implantable CRT’s are reportedly still implanted in patients. Included among the 30 confirmed malfunction reports, several reports indicate the pacemakers had just been implanted within the last three or four years. The recall includes InSync III implantable pulse generator pacemaker with model numbers 8042, 8042B, and 8042U. The devices were manufactured by Medtronic Inc., of Saint Paul, Minnesota where they were distributed for sale across the world, specifically nationwide in the U.S. to hospitals and healthcare providers. The recall includes exactly 96,787 units on the market. Healthcare professionals are being asked to contact their patients immediately to evaluate corrective treatments, increased follow-up appointments and/or any other medically advised courses of action depending on the individual. Patients with questions or further concerns may contact Medtronic Patient Services at 800-551-5544 or Medtronic Technical Services at 800-505-4636. Tags: Battery, Medtronic, Pacemaker Recall Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-931246p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Ken Wolter</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a> More Lawsuit Stories Pedestrian Deaths in U.S. Have Risen Nearly 50% Over the Past Decade: GHSA March 17, 2025 Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 March 14, 2025 At Least 8 Lawsuits Over Oxbryta Filed Against Pfizer, Global Blood Therapeutics March 14, 2025 1 Comments Madelyn October 30, 2018 I have a Saint Judes pacemaker. I had the first one, also a Saint Judes implanted in June of 2014, and was told it had been recalled because of battery failure in 2017. I developed breast cancer in my left breast and needed to have it taken out anyway, and have a new one implanted in my right breast. Is there a chance this caused my breast cancer, and could cause me to develop breast cancer in my right breast? Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (Posted: 3 days ago) Parties involved in Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits indicate they are ready to meet with a mediator in a couple weeks to begin potential settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)Discovery Deadlines in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Extended by MDL Judge (12/12/2024)Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (11/22/2024) Schedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has outlined the schedule for preparing a group of hair relaxer lawsuits for early bellwether trials, which will not go before a jury until at least 2027. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSynthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Settlement Talks Begin With Focus on Finding Mediator, Parties Report (02/11/2025) Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (Posted: 5 days ago) A BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit representing five women from across the country claims that the recalled implant was defectively designed, resulting in a recall and numerous complications. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)Schedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)
Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 March 14, 2025
Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (Posted: 3 days ago) Parties involved in Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits indicate they are ready to meet with a mediator in a couple weeks to begin potential settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)Discovery Deadlines in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Extended by MDL Judge (12/12/2024)Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (11/22/2024)
Schedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has outlined the schedule for preparing a group of hair relaxer lawsuits for early bellwether trials, which will not go before a jury until at least 2027. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSynthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Settlement Talks Begin With Focus on Finding Mediator, Parties Report (02/11/2025)
Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (Posted: 5 days ago) A BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit representing five women from across the country claims that the recalled implant was defectively designed, resulting in a recall and numerous complications. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)Schedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)