Medtronic SubQ Stimulation Settlement Results False Claims Allegations for $2.8M

Medtronic has reached a settlement, that will result in payments of $2.8 million to resolve claims that the company illegally promoted the SubQ spinal cord stimulation devices for unapproved uses. 

The U.S. Department of Justice announced the Medtronic SubQ stimulation settlement on February 6, resolving claims that the medical device manufacturer violated the False Claims Act from 2007 through 2011.

According to the allegations, Medtronic used “on-site training programs” for doctors and other methods to promote the use of its spinal cord stimulation devices for SubQ stimulation procedures, which involve placing the devices under the skin near an area of pain to provide electrical impulses meant to alleviate that pain. However, this procedure has never been approved by the FDA and has not been established as safe or effective.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

The Justice Department claims that this means “Medtronic knowingly caused dozens of physicians located throughout more than 20 states to submit claims to Medicare and TRICARE for investigational medical procedures known as SubQ stimulation that were not reimbursable.”

The allegations came as the result of a whistleblower lawsuit brought by Jason Nickell, a former Medtronic sales representative. Under the Qui Tam provisions of the false claims act, Nickell will be rewarded $602,000 of the $2.8 million settlement for bringing the situation to the government’s attention.

“Patients should be able to trust that their health care providers only use — and bill Medicare for — medical procedures that have been shown to be safe and effective,” Special Agent in Charge Scott J. Lampert, of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, said in the press release. “Our agency will continue to pursue medical device makers that ignore requirements designed to protect patient health and federal health care programs.”


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted 5 days ago)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.