Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medtronic Updates Doctors on Reports of Sprint Fidelis Lead Deaths March 16, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your Comments According to a letter sent to doctors on Friday by Medtronic, Inc., at least 107 deaths have been reportedly linked to their recalled Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads. However, Medtronic only acknowledges that the defective leads were a “possible or likely contributing factor” in 13 of the cases. The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead is a small electrical wires that was used to connect cardiac defibrillators to the heart between 2004 and 2007. In October 2007, a Medtronic recall was issued for the Sprint Fidelis leads due to an increased risk that the wire may fracture or break, which could result in unnecessary shocks or cause the defibrillator not to work if it is needed to deliver a life-saving jolt. Do You Know about… Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION About 268,000 people worldwide had the defective leads implanted in their bodies, and Medtronic acknowledged at the time of the recall that at least 5 deaths had been caused by their product. On March 13, 2009, Medtronic provided their first update for doctors about the number of Sprint Fidelis deaths that have been reported and confirmed. According to the letter, the FDA has received reports of 107 deaths which were allegedly caused by faulty lead wires. However, Medtronic indicates that most of the reports were made directly by patients or their product liability lawyers, without substantial supporting data. Medtronic convened a panel of physicians who reviewed 89 of the Sprint Fidelis death reports, and they only identified the defective defibrillator leads as a possible or likely factor in 13 of the fatalities. The panel did note that over 30% of the deaths (4 out of 13) occurred in patients who were having the Sprint Fidelis leads removed from the veins which carry the small wire from the defibrillator to the heart. This highlights the difficult position patients are placed in if their lead does fracture, as scar tissue often forms around the lead wire, making it very risky to remove the lead or attempt to thread a new lead through the vein. Last month, an independent study published by the medical journal Heart Rhythm, found that the Sprint Fidelis leads are only continuing to work in about 88% of patients reviewed at three years. The researchers also suggested that the risk of a lead fracture is higher than originally thought and is continuing to increase as time passes. About 2,000 Medtronic defibrillator lead lawsuits have been filed by patients who had the Sprint Fidelis lead implanted. In January 2009, U.S. District Judge Richard H. Kyle, who has been assigned to oversee pretrial litigation in all of the federal cases, indicated that the Sprint Fidelis lawsuits will be dismissed based on a recent Supreme Court decision that found medical device product liability claims are pre-empted by federal law if the device was approved by the FDA. Earlier this month, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 was introduced in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House to reverse the Supreme Court interpretation of federal law. If passed, the legislation would protect consumers ability to pursue product liability lawsuits, and likely restore patients’ ability to hold Medtronic responsible for injuries caused by their defective defibrillator leads. Tags: Defibrillator, Defibrillator Lead, Medtronic, Medtronic Recall, Product Liability, Sprint Fidelis More Lawsuit Stories Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL March 26, 2026 Lawsuit Claims Lyft Driver Sexually Assaulted Woman With Her Children in the Back Seat March 26, 2026 Genomic Prediction Class Action Lawsuit Claims IVF Testing Is Inaccurate, Unreliable March 26, 2026 6 Comments Tony November 25, 2011 I am 100% dependant on my device. When I found out about the leads(via the radio and internet), I was told by my then electrocardiologist that it was more risk to change out the leads,than to replace them.After having moved,my new electrocardiologist was outraged at what I had been told.Luckily I only experienced 2 shocks,but being 100% dependant on the device under those conditions is nothing other than a life or death situation.Within the same week of meeting my new doctor,new leads were installed. I had the recall leads for 11/2 yrs prior to correction.And FYI,leads can come loose at the device! And I’m still kickin! david September 29, 2010 i srongly feel that the medical safety act should be passed as a recipent of the sprint leads fractures i received 3 horrible schocks in oct 2006 which now requires meto take pain medication 4 times a day for severe joint pain. when discussed with my heart dr i was given 3 different causes for the schock happening. they turned the defillubrator off and went back in and did something which has helped but not sure what they had done Bernice July 2, 2009 Why aren’t medicines and medical devices being tested longer and more accurately? jack May 8, 2009 100% paced , non removable ,,WHO THEN IS RESPONSIBLE ? donald March 30, 2009 the medical device safety act s540/hr1346 should be sigin by all as soon as it can be. people are geting hurt very bad by this. JILL March 16, 2009 Please show your support of The Medical Device Safety Act S540/HR 1346 by signing and posting comments to “The Medical Device Safety Act Petition” found at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tftwj23/petition.html Thank you. URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (Posted: yesterday) Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis agree with calls to consolidate all Dupixent cancer lawsuits currently spread throughout the federal court system before one judge. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITEnlarged Lymph Nodes Led to Dupixent CTCL Diagnosis, Lawsuit Claims (03/16/2026)Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (03/09/2026)Dupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026) Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (Posted: 2 days ago) A group of about 70 Depo-Provera meningioma lawyers have been reappointed to key leadership roles in the litigation, as thousands of women seek compensation for brain tumors they say were caused by the birth control shots. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)Depo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (03/04/2026) Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (Posted: 3 days ago) Abbott Laboratories faces a lawsuit from a North Carolina woman who says sales representatives repeatedly tried to reprogram a spinal cord stimulator that had already failed due to other problems. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (03/10/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Lyft Driver Sexually Assaulted Woman With Her Children in the Back Seat March 26, 2026
Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (Posted: yesterday) Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis agree with calls to consolidate all Dupixent cancer lawsuits currently spread throughout the federal court system before one judge. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITEnlarged Lymph Nodes Led to Dupixent CTCL Diagnosis, Lawsuit Claims (03/16/2026)Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (03/09/2026)Dupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (Posted: 2 days ago) A group of about 70 Depo-Provera meningioma lawyers have been reappointed to key leadership roles in the litigation, as thousands of women seek compensation for brain tumors they say were caused by the birth control shots. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)Depo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (03/04/2026)
Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (Posted: 3 days ago) Abbott Laboratories faces a lawsuit from a North Carolina woman who says sales representatives repeatedly tried to reprogram a spinal cord stimulator that had already failed due to other problems. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (03/10/2026)