Mesothelioma Death Lawsuit Results in $7.25M Verdict

|

A Pennsylvania jury awarded $7.25 million to the family of man who died from mesothelioma cancer, which was allegedly caused by asbestos he was exposed to during his time as a worker in the Philadelphia Navy Yard during the 1960s.

The wrongful death lawsuit was brought by the family of Edward Merwitz, who died in July 2010. Merwitz was diagnosed with mesothelioma decades after asbestos exposure while stationed in the bilge section of warships at the naval yard.

Nine different manufacturers of asbestos products were named as a defendant in the case, offering the family only $2,500 to settle prior to trial. The family rejected the offer and pursued the mesothelioma lawsuit, which ended in a $7.25 million award last week.

|
|

According to allegations raised at trial, the defendants knowingly allowed employees to work around gaskets, motors and other components at the Navy yard that were protected by asbestos, without warning the employees of the potential health risks and without providing them proper safety equipment.

Mesotheliomaย is a rare form of cancer that is only known to be caused by exposure to asbestos. It is often not diagnosed until decades after exposure to the toxic fibers, at which time it is often at a very advanced stage and leaves individuals with a very short life-expectancy.

Asbestos exposure litigation has been on-going for decades in the United States, with more than 600,000 people having filed a lawsuit against more than 6,000 defendants after being diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer and other injuries that were allegedly caused by inhaling asbestos fibers. The complaints all involve similar allegations that companies that manufactured or used asbestos-based products failed to adequately warn about the health risks for workers or to take adequate steps to protect them from exposure.

In addition to claims for workers exposed to asbestos, in recent years there have been a growing number ofย mesothelioma lawsuits are brought following second hand exposure, with wives, children and other family members alleging they developed the disease after breathing asbestos fibers brought home in the hair or on the clothing of individuals who worked directly with the material.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.
A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโ€™s responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.