Metal-on-Metal Hip Pain Likely Caused by Tissue Damage: Study

Researchers indicate that individuals who suffer unexplained hip pain after receiving a metal-on-metal hip replacement are likely suffering tissue damage, as opposed to wear or degradation of the components. 

The study was conducted by researchers from the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), and was presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Chicago.

Although many suspect that such pain is caused by wear of the hip replacement, researchers determined recipients are usually experiencing tissue damage around their implant.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The study looked at nearly 100 patients with metal-on-metal hip replacement systems, half of whom needed revision surgery. The researchers found that patients with tissue damage around their implants were ten times as likely to have unexplained hip pain.

The study comes amid increasing concerns over the safety of metal-on-metal hip replacements. In recent years, several models have been linked to unusually high failure rates and revision surgeries, with many systems recalled from the market.

There are also concerns about metal debris shed into the body as the metal components rub against each other, which has been linked to the incidents of tissue damage as well as high levels of metal ions in the blood, a form of metal blood poisoning known as metallosis. Researchers say that tissue damage may be what is ultimately causing recipients to experience unexplained pain.

“We found that some patients had a significant amount of tissue damage but not a lot of wear, suggesting that factors other than wear are contributing to the problem regardless of whether the patients have pain,” said Dr. Timothy Wright, Kirby Chair of Orthopedic Biomechanics at HSS. “We have used the information from our study to develop guidelines for patients and surgeons.”

In January, the FDA released new guidance for metal-on-metal hip replacements. The agency told doctors that metal-on-metal hip replacement systems should only be used if other artificial hip implants were not appropriate, and called on manufacturers to prove that their implants were safe enough to stay on the market. Future metal-on-metal hip designs will have to undergo extensive human clinical trials before being made available for sale, the FDA decreed.

DePuy Orthopaedics, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, faces thousands of lawsuits over its recalled DePuy ASR metal hip replacement system. In addition, a growing number of lawsuits have been filed over other metal-on-metal hip systems, including the DePuy Pinnacle hip, Biomet M2A Magnum hip and Wright Medical Conserve Cup.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Settlement Reached To Resolve Hernia Mesh Lawsuits, With “Multi-Year” Payout Structure
Bard Settlement Reached To Resolve Hernia Mesh Lawsuits, With “Multi-Year” Payout Structure (Posted today)

Lawyers have reached a confidential settlement agreement to resolve tens of thousands of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits after six years of litigation, but individuals must still agree to participate and settle their claims.

Class Action Claims Over Hair Relaxer Risks Cleared To Move Forward by MDL Judge
Class Action Claims Over Hair Relaxer Risks Cleared To Move Forward by MDL Judge (Posted yesterday)

Court rejected a motion to dismiss the hair relaxer class actions lawsuits, which seek economic damages for consumers exposed to toxic chemicals in the products, which are now known to increase the risk of uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries.