Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Mitsubishi Recall Issued Over Control Arms Which May Detach Due To Corrosion June 3, 2020 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsMore than 140,000 Mitsubishi Outlander and Lancer vehicles have been recalled due to a risk the front control arms may rust and break, which could cause drivers to lose control of the vehicles.ย The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced the Mitsubishi Outlander and Lancer recall on May 26, indicating the front control arms and cross members were not adequately coated with the proper rust protection to sustain long term exposure to anti-freezing road treatments.The affected vehicles are equipped with a suspension system that contains control arms coated with general steel sheets. These may rust faster when consistently exposed to snowmelt water and anti-freezing agents, such as salt, used on roadways which get snow every year.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONOfficials warn that in the event of significant corrosion occurring, the lower control arm could eventually break off, resulting in loss of vehicle control and an increased risk of a crash and injury.Mitsubishi indicates it first learned about the issue in June 2016, after receiving a consumer complaint of a detached lower control arm. After a years-long investigation, Mitsubishi determined field reports related to lower control arm detachments were significantly higher in states that experience seasonal snowfalls, where roadways are treated with salt mixtures.According to Mitsubishiโs defect investigation, Lancer and Outlander vehicles manufactured prior to 2016 were designed with control arms containing general steel sheet coverings, which are subject to an accelerated course of corrosion. The manufacturer indicated the steel sheets were replaced with Zinc-coated steel sheets in 2016, which have higher corrosion resistance.The recall includes certain model year 2008 through 2010 Lancer, 2010 Lancer Sportback models, 2008 through 2013 Outlander, and 2011 through 2016 Outlander Sport models that were originally sold in, or ever registered in, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.The vehicles were manufactured by Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. They were distributed throughout the United States to licensed dealers.Mitsubishi announced it will begin notifying customers of the recall by mail, with instructions on how to schedule a free repair appointment at their local dealer. The dealers will be instructed to analyze the level of corrosion and either apply a sealing and anti-corrosion or replace the front cross member with a model made of anti-corrosion material.The recall is expected to begin on July 14, 2020 when repair parts become available. Customers with additional questions or concerns may contact Mitsubishi Customer Service at 1-888-648-7820 and reference the recall campaign number SR-20-003. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Auto Accident, Auto Recall, Mitsubishi Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-226651p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">IgorGolovniov</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims June 5, 2026 New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit June 5, 2026 Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claims System Failure Caused Woman To Suffer โDusky Metal Diseaseโ June 5, 2026 5 Comments Kendrick May 26, 2025 My subframe was rusted out pretty bad that my steering components are damaged. They did the recall work but won’t fix the parts that were possiblely damaged from the damaged subframe. Camille November 25, 2023 I purchased a 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander on July 26, 2023 at the Ciocca Subaru dealer, along with every warranty possible- dealer warranty, extended warranty, factory warranty, tire and collision, loaners for service repairs- all the bells and whistles. On November 22, 2023, I was leaving the grocery store coasting in the parking lot and the control arm snapped. Luckily I was able to pull over to the side of the parking lot and call roadside assistance (which never showed up) The next day was Thanksgiving so I had to wait until Friday to contact the dealer. After contacting both dealerships (Subaru and Mitsubishi), I was informed that I would have to get my car repaired at Mitsubishi but Ciocca Subaru would pay Mitsubishi the labor costs to install the brakes that they FAILED to install during the pre delivery inspection, and Ciocca Subaru would not be able to provide a loaner since Mitsubishi has to do the repairs. Mitsubishi stated that they would not provide a loaner because the dealer of purchase’s warranty should be providing that. Mitsubishi is saying I will have to pay for all repairs because the warranty does not cover the issue. At the time of purchase I was told that everything on the car was covered. I now have no transportation for my toddler and I and an expensive car note that pays for what exactly, eventually a repair bill of who knows how much, a car that sounds unsafe, and the feelings of being taken advantage of. Khia February 16, 2023 I have an 03 Mitsubishi lancer es, took to dealership 4/21 for the recall, they said no corrosion that it looked great, so they put a half butt layer of grease under my car. Yesterday thankfully only driving thru town at 25mph, control arm snapped right at crossmember, causing the car to come to an abrupt, rough stop and causing driver side tire to jam into wheel well and snapping my axel. I had 1 of my kids in the car, we were stuck in the road as my tire was jammed. If we had been on the highway going 70 and and this had happened, my daughter and i would not be here today! I am going after Mitsubishi to fix my car, it is beyond damaged and a scar of a lifetime! Carl November 23, 2020 I have a 2007 endeavor the rear sub frame has rusted away due to corrosion almost resulting in accident if not noticed this needs to be addressed before someone gets killed Christin November 2, 2020 I’m pretty sure that my 2003 Outlander front control arm went out on my way home from work which resulted in my car accident that I am lucky to be alive from what I was told. I had tried to get the recall taking care of it as soon as I got the notice I called Subaru Mitsubishi where I purchased the vehicle locally and to my surprise, they told me they couldn’t help me because they were no longer the Mitsubishi dealership they were just Subaru now but the logo was still on the building I called them three separate times and they still answer the phone Subaru Mitsubishi ext. the closest place that I could take it to get fixed it was about an hour away and could only be done Monday – Friday during working hours which did not work for me because my work schedule was Monday-Friday I worked anywhere from 65 to 75 hours a week and then had weekends off, I called the recall hotline I believe and they said that they documented everything I told them, I bought it locally so if I had to get it fixed it can be fixed locally and the time frame hours available did not work for me nor did driving an unsafe vehicle over an hour away as well as be able to get off work to even try to do it and it would take anywhere from 1 to 4 hours, I asked if there was any way that they can have it picked up so that I’m not driving it an hour away and that couldn’t be done either everything I suggested to try and get my issues to be resolved pertaining to my individual situation and circumstances were shut down there was nothing they could do except for document what I was telling him, I’m lucky to be alive and lucky nobody else was involved although it has forever altered my life physically and mentally. X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026) Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 2 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026) Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 3 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims June 5, 2026
Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claims System Failure Caused Woman To Suffer โDusky Metal Diseaseโ June 5, 2026
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 2 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)
Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 3 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)