Mobile Oxygen Storage Tank Recall Due to Fire Risk

AboutLawsuits

Add Your Comments

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Pacific Consolidated Industries, LLC, informed healthcare professionals, the U.S. military and emergency/disaster personnel of a Mobile Oxygen Storage Tank recall due to a risk that the pressure gauge could rupture and ignite, posing a fire risk.

The Mobile Oxygen Storage Tanks were manufactured by Pacific Consolidated Industries and distributed between January 11, 2005, through March 28, 2007 for use in military aircraft and disaster areas to quickly supply oxygen.

A defect in the oxygen tank’s pressure gauge could allow it to rupture and catch fire as a result of hydraulic fluid in the pressure gauge tubing. The oxygen tank recall has been classified as a “Class I Recall”, since use of the product poses a substantial risk of serious injury or death.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Pacific Consolidated Industries notified the U.S. Defense Supply Center of this oxygen tank recall on July 24, 2008, and information about the recall was posted for healthcare professions on the FDA website yesterday.

All of the Pacific Consolidated Mobile Oxygen Storage Tanks impacted by this recall should be quarantined until appropriate arrangements are made to ship the units back to the manufacturer.

Tags: Military, Oxygen Tank

More Lawsuit Stories

2 Comments

Charles
You do realize this item requires multiple people to move? Its not small by any measure. And no it is still not in general use in the military. Millions wasted.
Dineshkumar.G
Hello Sir, This is Dinesh from INDIA. I am thinking about implementing Oxygen Mask for people who drives in most polluted areas, mainly metropolitan cities. When i came to know this product(which is similar to my thought), i doubt whehter still the product is in ban? Still no alternative has been taken for preventing from fire risk? why it cant be be again come to market with safety measures?

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims
A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects
Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.
MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUIT
Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Thrombosis
A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamics’ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.