Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Survey Finds Broad Public Support for Impaired Driving Prevention Technologies in New Cars Impaired driving prevention systems in all new passenger vehicles should be mandatory, according to majority of people surveyed in a new study. May 8, 2023 Stephanie Yanovich Add Your Comments A new survey indicates there is broad public support for laws requiring impaired driving prevention technologies on all new vehicles, which could significantly reduce the risk of motor vehicle accidents caused by drunk driving. In a study published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) on April 20, researchers from Johns Hopkins University conducted a survey to measure how receptive the public would be to having drunk driving prevention technologies included as a standard features on all new cars. Despite criticism from the public over similar requirements that new vehicles contain certain safety technology, the survey found that the majority of respondents supported new regulations that would require automakers to equip newer vehicles with impaired driving prevention technologies. The survey comes as the Department of Transportation (DOT) faces a November 2024 deadline to establish new safety standards that will require all newer model vehicles to be equipped with impairment prevention devices, which are intended to reduce motor vehicle accident risks throughout the U.S. Impaired Driving Prevention Devices Could Greatly Reduce Highway Deaths Researchers conducted the survey by asking 2,274 U.S. adults to rate their support for a variety of proposed vehicle safety technologies mandates. The technologies rated in the survey were speed limiters, cell phone blockers, speed warnings, seat belt interlocks, fatigue warnings, and impaired driving prevention devices. According to the results, impaired driving prevention systems are second only to fatigue warnings in terms of public support. Almost 65% of respondents supported proposed regulations that would make impaired driving prevention systems standard features on all new passenger vehicles. The survey referenced prior studies that have found vehicle impairment prevention technologies could save over 9,000 lives per year, if installed in every passenger vehicle. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Impaired driving is defined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as operating a motor vehicle while affected by alcohol and/or other drugs, including prescriptions drugs, narcotics, and some over the counter medicines. Federal officials consider impaired driving to be one of the most persistent highway safety problems. Mandatory Impaired Driving Prevention Tech Will Likely Save Billions of Dollars Despite years of campaigns designed to raise awareness about the drunk driving risks, and increased enforcement actions, data still shows that the number of impaired drivers killed in car crashes has increased by 16% since 2006. Estimates suggest that drunk driving deaths involving people with blood alcohol concentrations over the legal limit account for nearly a quarter of all highway fatalities. In an effort to stop these preventable deaths, the Infrastructure and Jobs Act of 2021 requires that the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) establish a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard requiring impairment prevention systems on all new cars. The DOT standard must be finalized by November 2024, and would apply to all new cars manufactured within 3 subsequent years. The mandate is being implemented because auto makers have little financial incentive to voluntarily equip their vehicles with safety technology devices, which would increase vehicle price points and potentially drive away consumers. Before a final regulation can be issued, the DOT must determine which specific impairment technologies are most feasible, and design corresponding tests and criteria to ensure manufacturer compliance. It must also develop a cost estimate for the mandate compared to the total economic impact of impaired driving, which the NHTSA estimates at $296 billion annually. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), one such system already in the testing phase is the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS).  The device is similar to breath based ignition interlocks commonly installed on vehicles by court order for those convicted of driving while impaired or intoxicated. However, unlike the court ordered devices, the DADSS system functions by analyzing driver breathing and behavior patterns to determine if they are under the influence and automatically prevents a vehicle from moving if the device determines the driver is impaired. Tags: Auto Accident, Drunk Driver, Impaired Driving More Lawsuit Stories Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker March 26, 2025 Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 March 26, 2025 Lithium-Ion Battery Explosions Could Be Prevented by New Kind of Sensor March 26, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025) Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025) Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)
Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)
Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025)
Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)