Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Survey Finds Broad Public Support for Impaired Driving Prevention Technologies in New CarsImpaired driving prevention systems in all new passenger vehicles should be mandatory, according to majority of people surveyed in a new study. May 8, 2023 Stephanie Yanovich Add Your CommentsA new survey indicates there is broad public support for laws requiring impaired driving prevention technologies on all new vehicles, which could significantly reduce the risk of motor vehicle accidents caused by drunk driving.In a study published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) on April 20, researchers from Johns Hopkins University conducted a survey to measure how receptive the public would be to having drunk driving prevention technologies included as a standard features on all new cars.Despite criticism from the public over similar requirements that new vehicles contain certain safety technology, the survey found that the majority of respondents supported new regulations that would require automakers to equip newer vehicles with impaired driving prevention technologies.The survey comes as the Department of Transportation (DOT) faces a November 2024 deadline to establish new safety standards that will require all newer model vehicles to be equipped with impairment prevention devices, which are intended to reduce motor vehicle accident risks throughout the U.S.Impaired Driving Prevention Devices Could Greatly Reduce Highway DeathsResearchers conducted the survey by asking 2,274 U.S. adults to rate their support for a variety of proposed vehicle safety technologies mandates. The technologies rated in the survey were speed limiters, cell phone blockers, speed warnings, seat belt interlocks, fatigue warnings, and impaired driving prevention devices.According to the results, impaired driving prevention systems are second only to fatigue warnings in terms of public support. Almost 65% of respondents supported proposed regulations that would make impaired driving prevention systems standard features on all new passenger vehicles.The survey referenced prior studies that have found vehicle impairment prevention technologies could save over 9,000 lives per year, if installed in every passenger vehicle.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONImpaired driving is defined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as operating a motor vehicle while affected by alcohol and/or other drugs, including prescriptions drugs, narcotics, and some over the counter medicines. Federal officials consider impaired driving to be one of the most persistent highway safety problems.Mandatory Impaired Driving Prevention Tech Will Likely Save Billions of DollarsDespite years of campaigns designed to raise awareness about the drunk driving risks, and increased enforcement actions, data still shows that the number of impaired drivers killed in car crashes has increased by 16% since 2006.Estimates suggest that drunk driving deaths involving people with blood alcohol concentrations over the legal limit account for nearly a quarter of all highway fatalities.In an effort to stop these preventable deaths, the Infrastructure and Jobs Act of 2021 requires that the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) establish a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard requiring impairment prevention systems on all new cars. The DOT standard must be finalized by November 2024, and would apply to all new cars manufactured within 3 subsequent years.The mandate is being implemented because auto makers have little financial incentive to voluntarily equip their vehicles with safety technology devices, which would increase vehicle price points and potentially drive away consumers.Before a final regulation can be issued, the DOT must determine which specific impairment technologies are most feasible, and design corresponding tests and criteria to ensure manufacturer compliance. It must also develop a cost estimate for the mandate compared to the total economic impact of impaired driving, which the NHTSA estimates at $296 billion annually.According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), one such system already in the testing phase is the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS). ย The device is similar to breath based ignition interlocks commonly installed on vehicles by court order for those convicted of driving while impaired or intoxicated. However, unlike the court ordered devices, the DADSS system functions by analyzing driver breathing and behavior patterns to determine if they are under the influence and automatically prevents a vehicle from moving if the device determines the driver is impaired. Tags: Auto Accident, Drunk Driver, Impaired DrivingMore Lawsuit Stories J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits July 29, 2026 CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use July 29, 2026 Instant Pot Duo Nova Lawsuit Alleges Defective Pressure Cooker Caused Serious Burns July 29, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: today)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026) Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023) Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)Abbott faces a Proclaim spinal cord stimulator lawsuit by a man who says the device not only failed, but that he was repeatedly electrocuted when sales representatives without medical licenses tried to reprogram it.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Boston Scientific Sales Reps Made Unauthorized Device Adjustments (07/13/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: today)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)Abbott faces a Proclaim spinal cord stimulator lawsuit by a man who says the device not only failed, but that he was repeatedly electrocuted when sales representatives without medical licenses tried to reprogram it.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Boston Scientific Sales Reps Made Unauthorized Device Adjustments (07/13/2026)