Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Mechanical Failures, Biocompatibility Problems with NuVasive MAGEC System Implants Lead To FDA Warning July 19, 2021 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsU.S. health regulators are warning doctors about a potential risk of mechanical failures and problems with tissue incompatibility for certain NuVasive spinal rod systems, which are used to correct spinal deformities in children.The NuVasive MAGEC system warning was announced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on July 15, after the agency received an influx of involving biocompatibility issues, and component failures where the endcap separated from the rod part of the device. As a result, the FDA is warning physicians and healthcare professionals to closely monitor patients with implanted devices.The recalled NuVasive MAGEC systems are a growing spinal rod system intended for use among children under 10 years of age. The devices use magnets to help correct spinal deformities in children as they grow, and help mitigate the need for multiple operations to correct spinal curves.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONNuVasive first learned of the mechanical defects in early 2020, after receiving multiple reports of the endcap separating from the rod part of the device. As a result of the growing number of incident reports, NuVasive issued an Urgent Field Safety Notice (PDF) in February 2020 to recall the devices.The recall included MAGEC Spinal Bracing and Distraction System, MAGEC 2 Spinal Bracing and Distraction System, MAGEC System , MAGEC System Model X device, MAGEC System Model X rod and MAGEC System Rods.By July 2020, NuVasive and the FDA had worked closely to identify the root cause of the issue and ultimately cleared a modified version of the MAGEC Model X rod for use, which was designed to mitigate endcap separation events.However, since the recall FDA officials and NuVasive have placed a global shipping hold on all MAGEC devices following additional reports describing endcap separation, O-ring seal failure, and of potential exposure of internal components of this device to living tissue, which may lead to adverse local tissue reactions.In the latest announcement, officials recommend physicians not remove the functioning MAGEC rods prior to two years of implantation, and to perform a full evaluation, including radiographs of any patient presenting with unexplained symptoms of back pain, inflammation, or deformity.The FDA is instructing healthcare providers and patients to report any adverse events or suspected problems with NuVasive MAGEC device system implants through MedWatch, the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting program.NuVasive Precice RecallEarlier this month, the FDA issued another NuVasive Specialized Orthopedicsโ Precice device warning, advising healthcare professionals to closely monitor patients who have been implanted with a different stainless steel and titanium-based Precice device manufactured by the same company, indicating that doctors should watch for bone and soft tissue changes surrounding the implant area.The Precice family of devices are implantable and adjustable rods driven by an internal magnetic mechanism. Depending on the design, they are implanted in adults to lengthen limbs, shorten or compress limbs, or transport segments of long bones. However, the systems have also been associated with adverse events related to biocompatibility issues. These may have been caused by corrosion, wear, and unanticipated exposure of components still undergoing biocompatibility testing.The FDA announced that while the root cause of these reports is currently unknown, the agency will continue to work closely with NuVasive to perform additional biocompatibility testing to determine if the adverse events are due to the stainless-steel material or related to design features and materials common to all Precice devices. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Biocompatibility, Bone Implant, Medical Device Recall, NuVasiveMore Lawsuit Stories Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL August 24, 2026 Kratom Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Opioid-Like Products Caused Addiction, Cardiac Injury August 24, 2026 Clear Eyes Recall Issued Due to Risk Eye Drops May Be Contaminated August 24, 2026 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)A federal judge has appointed a group of plaintiffs attorneys to leadership positions in the growing Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator federal litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (08/18/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026) Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)Abbott Laboratories has agreed to pay $670 million to resolve more than 2,000 Similac NEC injury lawsuits, as the first federal NEC trial against competitor Mead Johnson gets underway.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITMissouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit (08/20/2026)Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week (08/11/2026)Neocate Infant Formula Lawsuit Alleges Nutritional Defect Caused Rickets, Bone Fractures (08/05/2026) Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 4 days ago)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)
Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL August 24, 2026
Kratom Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Opioid-Like Products Caused Addiction, Cardiac Injury August 24, 2026
Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)A federal judge has appointed a group of plaintiffs attorneys to leadership positions in the growing Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator federal litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (08/18/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)
Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)Abbott Laboratories has agreed to pay $670 million to resolve more than 2,000 Similac NEC injury lawsuits, as the first federal NEC trial against competitor Mead Johnson gets underway.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITMissouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit (08/20/2026)Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week (08/11/2026)Neocate Infant Formula Lawsuit Alleges Nutritional Defect Caused Rickets, Bone Fractures (08/05/2026)
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 4 days ago)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)