Ohio Medical Malpractice Bill Seeks to Expand “I’m Sorry” Law

Ohio is moving to become the latest state to strengthen it’s “I’m sorry” laws, which would prevent evidence regarding admissions of fault made by doctors from being used by families in medical malpractice lawsuits seeking financial compensation for injuries or deaths caused by the error. 

About 40 states already have some form of law on the books that prevents the use of doctors’ apologies in court, including Ohio. However, a proposal currently pending in the Ohio General Assembly, as well as a bill pending in Congress, seek to go further.

The proposed expansion of Ohio’s “I’m sorry” law would not only protect general apologies, but also admissions of guilt and negligence made to families, preventing the statements from being used against the doctor in any subsequent lawsuits filed.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

Proponents of the legislation suggest that it will reduce the number of medical malpractice lawsuits filed by families seeking answers about the death of a loved one, according to a report by the Associated Press.

The bill is designed to allow doctors to feel comfortable apologizing for harmful medical mistakes, knowing that the statements will not be later used against them. Advocates for the expansion of the current law indicate that the change is needed to allow doctors to better communicate with the family and more easily satisfy many of the open questions that could lead the family to contact a medical malpractice lawyer.

However, a multistate analysis conducted last year found that there is no clear evidence that “I’m Sorry” laws are having any impact on medical malpractice lawsuits.

Critics of expansion of the Ohio law indicate that it will provide an invitation for doctors to perjure themselves at trial, allowing doctors and their insurers to deny that medical mistakes were made at trial, even after telling the family that errors caused an injury or death. Opponents suggest that information about recognized mistakes should be outlined in medical records.

Doctors are already required to inform patients of medical mistakes that caused harm. In 2010, the American Medical Association (AMA) Counsel on Ethical and Judicial Affairs’ code of ethics stated that doctors are “ethically required to inform the patient of all the facts necessary to ensure understanding of what has occurred.” The AMA considers facts about medical mistakes, complications or adverse events to be included in that information.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard 3DMax Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin in April 2024
Bard 3DMax Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin in April 2024 (Posted today)

With thousands of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits pending in the federal court system, a fourth bellwether trial will be held in the spring, involving allegations that defects with Bard 3DMax caused painful and permanent injuries.

Ozempic Gastroparesis Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About Permanent Stomach Problems
Ozempic Gastroparesis Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About Permanent Stomach Problems (Posted 2 days ago)

A South Dakota man has filed one of the first gastroparesis lawsuits against Ozempic manufacturers, alleging that users have not been adequately warned about the risk of severe vomiting and long-term stomach side effects.