OIG Issues Fraud Alert on Physician-Owned Medical Device Manufacturers

|||

A fraud alert concerning doctor owned medical device distributors was issued March 26, by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (DHHS-OIG), bringing increased scrutiny for the doctor owned businesses. 

The alert (PDF) focused on physician owned distributors (PODs) selling medical devices that were ordered by the physicians themselves for use in procedures they perform on their own patients at hospitals.

The OIG called PODs “inherently suspect under the anti-kickback statute” with dubious circumstances surrounding the business transactions and patient referrals from which they benefit.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

These arrangements result in increased profits for the doctors and often involve profit sharing with the hospitals or ambulatory surgical centers where the procedures are conducted. The anti-kickback statute aims to protect patients from medical referrals by healthcare professionals solely based on the influence of financial incentives.

Such kick-backs result in the corruption of medical judgment, over utilization of a particular medical device, increased costs to the federal health care programs and beneficiaries and unfair competition, the OIG warns.

The incentives would cause doctors to “perform more procedures than are medically necessary” and to use the devices which the physician-owned distributors (PODs) sell, instead of other devices which may be medically necessary or more clinically appropriate.

Disclosure Not Considered Enough

The OIG also warns against merely using a disclosure highlighting doctor financial interest in the POD. A disclosure of this nature is often part of testimonials by the doctor, citing why the patient should use the facility in the first place. The OIG alert indicates that this does not offer adequate warning or protection for patients against a conflict of interest of this nature, potentially affecting a doctors medical judgment due to a financial influence.

Other guidance concerning illegal kick-backs has been issued by the OIG, specifically the 1989 special Fraud Alert on Joint Venture Arrangements. While the alert noted it did not wish to “discourage innovation,” it discourages hospitals from using PODs and doctors from joining them.

“The strong potential for improper inducements between and among the physician investors, the entities, device vendors, and device purchasers should be closely scrutinized under the fraud and abuse laws,” said a 2006 OIG letter regarding doctor investments in PODs.

Typically the PODs involved small companies who manufacture orthopedic and spinal device distribution, but can also pertain to other medical device distributors. The discouragement from using PODs may result in boosting business for many of the larger manufacturers, such as Medtronic Inc. or Johnson & Johnson.

Written by: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.

Image Credit: |||



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates a woman developed a brain tumor that caused memory loss, dizziness and headaches after several years of receiving the birth control injections.
A Michigan couple has filed a Brookstone fire pit lawsuit, indicating the wife suffered severe burn injuries due to the product’s design and refueling instructions.
Nitrous oxide injury lawsuits are emerging as medical evidence links recreational use of the gas to nerve damage that can cause numbness, balance problems and difficulty walking, often without adequate side effect warnings.