Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Oxbryta Class Action Lawsuit Filed by Former Users of Sickle Cell Disease Drug Recalled in 2024Lawsuit seeks damages for all users of the recalled sickle cell disease drug, even if they were not physically injured by Oxbryta side effects. December 30, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsPfizer faces an Oxbryta class action lawsuit brought by a group of former users of the sickle cell disease drug, who claim that the manufacturers knew or should have known about serious health risks associated with the treatment long before it was recalled earlier this year.The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on December 23, by Rick Jolly, Amanda Winbush, Darryl Weekly and Antonio Johnson, seeking class action status to pursue damages for anyone in the U.S. who used Oxbryta since November 1, 2019, and paid at least partially out-of-pocket.Oxbryta (voxelotor) was first introduced by Global Blood Therapeutics in late 2019, after it was granted accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The expensive drug was promoted as the first medication to treat the root cause of sickle cell disease, by improving hemoglobin levels in the body and helping the blood cells retain more oxygen. Pfizer acquired Global Blood Therapeutics for $5.4 billion in 2022.However, following a large number of reports involving users experiencing painful sickle cell complications and deaths, Pfizer announced a global Oxbryta recall in September 2024, acknowledging that the risks associated with the treatment outweigh any potential benefits.Since then, several Oxbryta lawsuits have been filed by former users who suffered side effects from the treatments, but this latest complaint seeks damages even for those who have not been injured, alleging that the drug makers placed a desire for profits before the health and safety of individuals with sickle cell disease.Oxbryta LawsuitWere you prescribed Oxbryta?Oxbryta lawsuits are being filed for sickle cell disease patients who developed vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), strokes and other side effects caused by recalled Oxbryta.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONOxbryta LawsuitWere you prescribed Oxbryta?Oxbryta lawsuits are being filed for sickle cell disease patients who developed vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), strokes and other side effects caused by recalled Oxbryta.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONPlaintiffs who filed this Oxbryta class action lawsuit argue that Pfizer failed to provide adequate warnings about potential side effects users may face, and targeted underserved communities before the Oxbryta recall, indicating that data has linked the drug to an increase in vaso-occlusive crises for years.Vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) occur when the red blood cells block blood flow, and the tissues become deprived of oxygen. This can cause an inflammatory response, which can lead to symptoms like pain in the chest, back and limbs, as well as fever. Patients often have to be hospitalized and can suffer kidney failure and stroke. Additionally, many patients can suffer death following a vaso-occlusive event.None of the plaintiffs named in this class action complaint claim that they suffered physical injuries due to Oxbryta, but argue that neither they nor others would have purchased the expensive drug if they had been informed about the true health risks.โFor purposes of inducing consumers to purchase Oxbryta, Defendants: (a) affirmatively misrepresented the most important and material facts directly to consumers regarding the safety of Oxbryta; and/or (b) misbranded Oxbryta; and/or (c) fraudulently concealed from and/or failed to disclose to consumers material facts regarding the safety of Oxbryta,โ the lawsuit states. โFederal law requires Defendants to ensure that their drug labels remain accurate, and when new scientific information renders their labels inaccurate, federal law requires Defendants to act. Failure to do so renders Oxbryta misbranded.โThe lawsuit presents claims of breach of warranty, violation of the Magnuson-Moss Act, common law fraud, unjust enrichment, and violations of fair trade and consumer fraud laws in Georgia, Indiana and Illinois. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Oxbryta, Oxbryta Recall, Pfizer, Sickle Cell, Stroke, Vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs)More Oxbryta Lawsuit Stories Oxbryta Lawsuit Settlement Terms Still Being Finalized February 18, 2026 Oxbryta Settlement Reached by Pfizer To Resolve Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Lawsuit November 6, 2025 EU Confirms Oxbryta Risk of Sickle Cell Disease Complications, Death Outweigh Benefits October 30, 2025 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026) Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: yesterday)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026) SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: 2 days ago)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)
EU Confirms Oxbryta Risk of Sickle Cell Disease Complications, Death Outweigh Benefits October 30, 2025
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)
Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: yesterday)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)
SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: 2 days ago)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)