Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Philips CPAP Foam Removal Attempted By Some Owners of Sleep Apnea Machines, Despite FDA Warnings Attempting to remove sound abatement foam from recalled Philips sleep apnea machines may pose serious health risks October 22, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Despite warnings from federal regulators, some consumers are apparently trying to remove Philips CPAP sound abatement foam from recalled DreamStation sleep apnea machines, potentially causing serious safety risks and destroying important evidence that may be needed if they pursue a lawsuit over injuries caused by the toxic foam. A massive Philips Respironics sleep apnea machine recall was issued in June 2021, after the manufacturer acknowledged that the sound abatement foam may deteriorate and break down, releasing black particles and toxic chemicals directly into the machine’s air pathways, tubing and face mask. As a result of the potential long-term side effects of breathing the Philips CPAP foam, federal health officials recommended that owners of all DreamStation devices immediately stop using their sleep apnea machine, unless it was necessary for life-sustaining therapy. However, replacement CPAP machines have been in low supply and it is expected that Philips CPAP recall repairs will take over a year to complete, leaving many individuals without access to a machine they rely on for treatment of their sleep apnea. Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Over the past few weeks, a number of instructional videos have shown up on Youtube, providing detailed instructions for removing the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam from the DreamStation sleep apnea machine, suggesting that it will then allow owners to use the device again. While several of the videos include vague warnings that suggest viewers should not actually attempt to remove the CPAP sound abatement foam themselves, the videos then go on to demonstrate exactly how to do so. In a series of answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) published by the FDA on September 10, the agency clearly warned against Philips CPAP foam removal by owners of the sleep apnea machine, suggesting that it may pose serious health risks. “The FDA recommends you do not attempt to remove the sound abatement foam, as it may impact device performance and possibly introduce additional foam debris into the device air pathways,” according to the statement. “Philips Respironics is directly responsible for repair and replacement of all recall affected devices.” Since the recall, lab analysis has identified a number of harmful and potentially cancer-causing chemicals in the CPAP sound abatement foam, including toluene diamine, toluene diisocyanate and diethylene glycol. In addition, several Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) have been identified from “off-gasing” as the foam breaks down. Dozens of owners are now pursuing Philips CPAP recall lawsuits against the manufacturer, claiming that long-term exposure to the foam while using the sleep apnea machine caused various types of cancer and other respiratory side effects, including pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonia, asthma, bronchitis and other injuries. For individuals who attempt removal of the CPAP sound abatement foam or otherwise alter the state of their machine, lawyers warn that they are likely to face challenges in any lawsuit later brought against Philips, under the defense of “spoliation of evidence”, since plaintiffs will have the burden of proof to establish that the foam in their CPAP machine degraded and caused any long-term injury suffered. Product liability lawyers recommend all Philips DreamStation machines be preserved and that no material changes are made to the sleep apnea device, as injuries caused by prior exposure to deteriorating foam may take some time to emerge. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Class Action Lawsuit, CPAP, Medical Device Recall, Particulate Matter, Philips, Respiratory, Sleep Apnea More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 1 Comments Jeffry January 6, 2022 Oh baloney! You can now preserve the foam in the casing intact by replacing the entire internal casing with a foamless one. Your solution is to keep breathing through it as is? PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (Posted: today) A federal judge has put in place additional procedures to address the deaths of women suffering from cancer who are pursuing hair relaxer lawsuits, allowing estates and families to take up their claims. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (01/28/2026) Young People and Gambling: Why Men Are Disproportionately Affected by Sports Betting Addiction (Posted: yesterday) As legal sports betting expands nationwide, research and emerging lawsuits suggest that young men face disproportionate risks from mobile sportsbook apps that combine constant access, gamified design and aggressive promotional tactics, potentially accelerating patterns of gambling addiction and financial harm. MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITStudy Indicates Gambling Addiction Impact Similar to Effects of Drugs, Alcohol and Chronic Conditions (02/23/2026)Judge Clears DraftKings Lawsuit Over Deceptive Practices To Move Forward (02/20/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Calls Polymarket Illegal Sports Betting Site (02/19/2026) MDL Sought for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Abbott, Boston Scientific (Posted: 2 days ago) Plaintiffs are asking a federal panel to consolidate a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits against Abbott and Boston Scientific, alleging defective design changes caused lead fractures, device failures and neurological injuries nationwide. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit Filed Over Problems With WaveWriter Alpha System (02/16/2026)Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Resulted in Removal of Boston Scientific Device (02/02/2026)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (Posted: today) A federal judge has put in place additional procedures to address the deaths of women suffering from cancer who are pursuing hair relaxer lawsuits, allowing estates and families to take up their claims. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (01/28/2026)
Young People and Gambling: Why Men Are Disproportionately Affected by Sports Betting Addiction (Posted: yesterday) As legal sports betting expands nationwide, research and emerging lawsuits suggest that young men face disproportionate risks from mobile sportsbook apps that combine constant access, gamified design and aggressive promotional tactics, potentially accelerating patterns of gambling addiction and financial harm. MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITStudy Indicates Gambling Addiction Impact Similar to Effects of Drugs, Alcohol and Chronic Conditions (02/23/2026)Judge Clears DraftKings Lawsuit Over Deceptive Practices To Move Forward (02/20/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Calls Polymarket Illegal Sports Betting Site (02/19/2026)
MDL Sought for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Abbott, Boston Scientific (Posted: 2 days ago) Plaintiffs are asking a federal panel to consolidate a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits against Abbott and Boston Scientific, alleging defective design changes caused lead fractures, device failures and neurological injuries nationwide. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit Filed Over Problems With WaveWriter Alpha System (02/16/2026)Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Resulted in Removal of Boston Scientific Device (02/02/2026)