Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Philips Not Replacing Or Repairing Recalled CPAP Machines, Class Action Lawsuit ClaimsPhilips CPAP Repairs and replacements may take over a year to complete, leaving owners with no option but to pay full price for a newer version August 10, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsAfter telling millions of individuals with recalled Philips CPAP machines to immediately stop using their products for treatment of sleep apnea, class action lawsuits allege the manufacturer is failing to provide recall repairs or cover the cost of replacing the defective machines.In June, Koninklijke Philips issued a recall that impacted more than 3.5 million CPAP, BiPAP and ventilator machines sold since 2009, most of which were part of the DreamStation family of products used by individuals suffering from sleep apnea.According to Philips, the recalled CPAP machines contain a defective polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam, which has been found to break down and release toxic chemicals and debris directly into the lungs and air pathways during use, exposing users to serious health risks.Stay Up-to-Date AboutPhilips CPAP Recall LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutPhilips CPAP Recall LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreConsumers who rely on the machines for sleep apnea and other non-life sustaining therapy have been urged to immediately stop using the machines and contact their doctors to discuss treatment alternatives. However, the manufacturer has yet to announce a CPAP machine recall repair and replacement program, leaving consumers to potentially pay hundreds of dollars to replace the devices.According to a class action complaint (PDF) filed last week John Anthony in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Philips has known about these dangers for years, but did nothing to warn patients or doctors until recently.โ[D]espite the recall, Philips is still not actually repairing or replacing affected devices, which many patients rely upon on a daily basis to treat serious medical conditions,โ according to the lawsuit that seeks damages for all U.S. consumers. โSince Philips is now telling patients it is not safe to use these devices, but many patients rely on them to treat serious health conditions, Philips leaves many patients with no safe option but to pay full price for a newer version.โAnthony indicates he began using a DreamStation this Spring, for the treatment of his sleep apnea. However, now Anthony says he is too afraid to use the device, due to the potential risk that respiratory problems or cancer may be caused by the Philips CPAP machine.โPhilips has indicated it may take over a year before it can start repairing or replacing [recalled CPAP machines],โ according to the complaint. โInstead, Philips is using this as an opportunity to encourage consumers to buy its second-generation products (at full price). Unfortunately for patients who need to use these devices every day to stave off serious health problems, waiting over a year for Philips to offer some sort of repair is not a realistic option.โThe case joins a growing number of Philips CPAP machine lawsuits filed since the recall was issued, seeking both damages for replacement costs and medical expenses associated with monitoring for injuries that may develop in the future, as well as additional damages for individuals who have already required medical treatment for cancer, respiratory injuries or other complications that appear to be linked to exposure to the defective sound abatement foam.Given similar allegations raised in complaints filed throughout the federal court system, a panel of federal judges has been asked to establish a Philips CPAP MDL, centralizing and consolidating the sleep apnea machine litigation before one judge. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Class Action Lawsuit, CPAP, CPAP Recall, Philips, Sleep Apnea Image Credit: |More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 7 Comments Malinda September 16, 2023 Applied for replacement when it was first announced and did my mother in law. She got hers about 4 months after and I am still waiting. It is now 9/16/2023 (OVER 2 YEARS!). When I call them, they just keep stating I am on the list! Paula November 14, 2022 My sister and I both filed for a new cpap machine in June 2021. She got her replacement in 4 months. I am still waiting. The difference is she had a dream machine while I have a remstar system one. I called multiple times and got the run around each time. They refused to give me any kind of a status update. I finally heard from them. I got a letter offering me $50. I am required to get a new script for the cpap. My sister did not have to get a new script. Once they get the script I am required to prove to them that I still need to use cpap. My sister did not have to prove her need for her cpap either. Phillips is discriminating against lower income customers. Phillips was ordered to replace all of the machines. They are trying to cut their costs because if you accept the $50 then you are no longer eligible for a new machine. What they are doing is unethical! They are trying to cheat customers out of their replacement. Dale October 4, 2022 Filed for the recall as soon ad it came out. Was told it would be about a year. Called after the year went by … nothing… Received a notice today from Phillips that I have 2 choices…#1 Take $50 and mail old machine back to get it out of circulation as they don’t have the parts to fix it. #2. Buy my next CPAP machine out of my pocket or contact my insurance carrier. This is really a backwater way for a company to try and wipe their hands clean of a mess they have created. Phillips I hope you hear this….. AFTER USING YOUR PRODUCTS FOR OVER 58,00 HOURS OF CPAP SLEEPING….NEVER AGAIN WILL I BUY OR RECOMMEND ANYTHING MADE BY YOUR BS COMPANY! Pamela January 10, 2022 Got my new machine after ‘only’ three months. The machine is a generic one. I had a humidifier. This one does not. No tubing and in my old one it dies not fit. This is not a fair trade!!!!! Cynthia January 7, 2022 My machine has not been replaced since June 2021! I have called Twenty two times for updates with different timelines each time! Still nothing seven months later. Phillips records record profits while I may have a heart attack from my extreme sleep apnea without a machine! I have had breast cancer along with six other surgeries/hospitalizations in four years! Unethical, Horrible treatment of patientโs care! Denise September 5, 2021 I received a supposedly new Dream Station 2 on 9/1/21 to replace my recalled Dream Station unit, and shipped the original back to Phillips as instructed. The replacement is defective. When it turns on, it says the pressure is 6, but it’s much lower than that – I can feel it. It never reaches therapeutic pressure, and my AHI has ranged between 15 and 22 in the few nights I have used it. With the prior machine, my AHI was averaging 5 to 8. I am currently researching what my recourse is to get a FUNCTIONING replacement machine. Charles August 12, 2021 More have the informed any doctors about this as I had to inform my doctor on myself and that didnโt go any where having the biggest run around for me 2 months just to get my insurance company to just rent a new one tell my 5 years are up the to pay full price Iโm getting the short end on this and still have to see how bad my health gets as I can now not work to the my shortness of breathCompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death (Posted: today)As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumerโs death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITKizzby Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Claims Alcohol-Fueled Bowl Exploded, Igniting Womanโs Hand (04/01/2026)Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns (03/19/2026)Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (01/19/2026) Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026) Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: 2 days ago)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death (Posted: today)As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumerโs death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITKizzby Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Claims Alcohol-Fueled Bowl Exploded, Igniting Womanโs Hand (04/01/2026)Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns (03/19/2026)Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (01/19/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)
Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: 2 days ago)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)