Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Philips DreamStation Recall Repairs Allowed To Proceed, Subject to CPAP Foam Preservation Requirements Philips must preserve any replaced devices, and any foam, blower box, and SD card removed from any sleep apnea machines it repairs. November 23, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments The U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal Philips DreamStation recall has issued an order authorizing the manufacturer to move forward with plans to remove and replace defective sound abatement foam in the sleeping machines, but requires that certain critical evidence be preserved. A massive Philips Respironics sleep machine recall was issued in June, impacting millions of CPAP and BiPAP breathing devices that contained a polyester-based (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam, which was intended to reduce sounds and vibrations during use. However, the manufacturer now acknowledges that the CPAP foam degrades over time, and may release black particles or debris directly into the sleep apnea machine’s air pathways, exposing users to a number of toxic chemicals and gases. Over the past few months, dozens of personal injury and class action lawsuits over the Philips sleep apnea machine recall have been filed throughout the federal court system, each raising similar allegations that exposure the deteriorating sound abatement foam exposed users to a risk of cancer, severe respiratory problems and other health complications. Given common questions of fact and law raised in product liability and class action lawsuits over recalled Philips CPAP devices and other breathing assistance machines, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decided last month to centralize the litigation before Senior U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti in the Western District of Pennsylvania for pretrial proceedings as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL). Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More In an emergency motion (PDF) filed on November 12, attorneys for the manufacturer asked the court to modify a prior preservation order, and allow Philips DreamStation recall repairs to begin, where the PE-PUR foam will be removed from sleep apnea machines and replaced with a different material. Philips Respironics indicated that as of that date, it had received approximately 335,000 recalled sleep apnea machines from consumers, and had already reworked and returned approximately 115,000 devices, with plans to repair about 2,500 machines per day until it is able to increase capacity, and allow it to repair up to 5,500 devices per day. The motion came after the Court issued a preservation order early in the litigation, which may have barred the sleep machine repairs in order to maintain evidence relevant to the cases. In a response (PDF) filed on November 15, plaintiffs pursuing lawsuits indicated that they have no problem with Philips repairing recalled machines, but objected to the likely, and unnecessary, destruction of evidence. “Plaintiffs do not take issue with Philips repairing recalled machines and sending them to Class members, so long as the repaired machines are safe for Plaintiffs and Class members,” the opposition brief notes. “But Philips proposes to destroy evidence unnecessarily. Philips should preserve all relevant evidence, including the PE-PUR foam that is at issue in this litigation, memory cards in the devices, and other component parts of machines that are removed in the retrofitting process, for possible inspection and testing at a later time.” Judge Conti agreed and issued a pretrial order (PDF) on November 19, which allows Philips Respironics to repair and replace the recalled devices, but requires them to preserve any devices in their entirety that they replace. In addition, the order calls on Philips to preserve, store and catalogue any blower box, PE-PUR foam, and SD card from any recalled CPAP machines which they are retrofitting, along with the original serial number so the device can be traced back to the specific individual who used it. Philips DreamStation CPAP Health Risks Due to concerns about the serious health risks from the Philips sleep apnea machines, the FDA issued a safety communication on June 30, urging people who use Philips DreamStation, CPAP or BiPAP machines to immediately stop using their device and contact their healthcare providers for a suitable treatment alternative. Unfortunately, there has been a limited supply of the breathing machines available, and alternative treatments for sleep apnea or lifestyle changes may not provide immediate relief, leaving many users concerned about side effects they may experience without the CPAP machine to keep their airway open at night. In the wake of the recall, Philips has not provide replacement CPAP machines to all consumers or offered to immediately refund sleep apnea machines with the defective PE-PUR foams. It was not until September that Philips announced a replacement plan, which it estimates will take up to a year to complete. The Dutch manufacturer, Koninklijke Philips, N.V. generated over $23 billion in revenue last year, and is expected to face massive liability from lawsuits and CPAP machine settlements over the next few years. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES CTCL Diagnosis Leads to Lawsuit Over Dupixent Cancer Risks (Posted: today) A Dupixent cancer lawsuit indicates that manufacturers knew of the risks of CTCL, yet failed to report them to patients or doctors. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Dupixent Side Effects Led to CTCL Cancer Diagnosis (01/12/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Cancer Diagnosis After One Year of Injections (12/30/2025)Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Diagnosis (12/19/2025) Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Resulted in Removal of Boston Scientific Device (Posted: yesterday) A Florida man has filed a lawsuit alleging that battery-related malfunctions in a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator caused severe pain and shocking sensations, which required repeated reprogramming attempts that failed, requiring permanent removal. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (01/26/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025) Rechargeable Heated Insole Lawsuit Alleges Lithium-Ion Batteries Caught Fire, Burned Feet (Posted: 4 days ago) A Tennessee man claims that a pair of rechargeable heated insoles exploded while he was wearing them, raising similar concerns to a growing number of lawsuits alleging defects may allow the batteries to overheat or fail. MORE ABOUT: HEATED INSOLE LAWSUITWalmart Ozark Trail Stove Lawsuit Filed After Camping Stove Explosion Caused Severe Burns (02/03/2026)Walmart Heating Pad Lawsuit Alleges Device Malfunction Led to Third Degree Burns (01/26/2026)Insole Foot Warmer Burns Often Lead to Debridement Surgery and Long-Term Nerve Damage, Lawsuits Allege (01/22/2026)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
CTCL Diagnosis Leads to Lawsuit Over Dupixent Cancer Risks (Posted: today) A Dupixent cancer lawsuit indicates that manufacturers knew of the risks of CTCL, yet failed to report them to patients or doctors. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Dupixent Side Effects Led to CTCL Cancer Diagnosis (01/12/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Cancer Diagnosis After One Year of Injections (12/30/2025)Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Diagnosis (12/19/2025)
Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Resulted in Removal of Boston Scientific Device (Posted: yesterday) A Florida man has filed a lawsuit alleging that battery-related malfunctions in a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator caused severe pain and shocking sensations, which required repeated reprogramming attempts that failed, requiring permanent removal. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (01/26/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)
Rechargeable Heated Insole Lawsuit Alleges Lithium-Ion Batteries Caught Fire, Burned Feet (Posted: 4 days ago) A Tennessee man claims that a pair of rechargeable heated insoles exploded while he was wearing them, raising similar concerns to a growing number of lawsuits alleging defects may allow the batteries to overheat or fail. MORE ABOUT: HEATED INSOLE LAWSUITWalmart Ozark Trail Stove Lawsuit Filed After Camping Stove Explosion Caused Severe Burns (02/03/2026)Walmart Heating Pad Lawsuit Alleges Device Malfunction Led to Third Degree Burns (01/26/2026)Insole Foot Warmer Burns Often Lead to Debridement Surgery and Long-Term Nerve Damage, Lawsuits Allege (01/22/2026)