Radiology Malpractice Lawsuit Results in $3M Award

|

A Michigan woman was awarded nearly $3 million in a radiology malpractice lawsuit that was delayed several years on appeal over the use of an affidavit from an out-of-state doctor establishing that she had a legitimate case.

The plaintiff, Sue Apsey, was awarded $2.978 million by a Shiawassee County jury last month, in a medical malpractice lawsuit filed against Shiawassee Radiology Consultants, P.C., Dr. James H. Deering and Memorial Healthcare. However, the verdict will be reduced under the Michigan cap on damages.

Apsey alleged that radiologists missed, or failed to report, that she had a bowel leak during a January 2000 operation to remove a cyst from her ovaries. The radiology mistake was exacerbated when Apsey was prescribed barium to assist with imaging, and the barium leaked into her intestines, causing chemical peritonitis on top of the bacterial peritonitis from the undiagnosed bowel leak. Barium is a potentially toxic heavy metal used to aid in CT scan imaging. Apsey had to undergo a number of surgeries as a result of her infections, including skin grafts.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

Originally filed in 2000, the lawsuit was delayed for several years as the case made its way through the Michigan appeals courts. Apsey argued on appeal that an affidavit from an out-of-state doctor was appropriate to certify her lawsuit met the burden under Michigan law. The state Supreme Court ultimately sided with Apsey and her case was remanded for trial.

The jury only found Shiawassee Radiology liable in the case, saying that the group was negligent due to its radiologists failing to diagnose the bowel leak in a timely manner. Neither Deering nor Memorial Healthcare were found to be responsible for the medical mistake.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025.
Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.
An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe.