Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Schwab Lawsuit Restrictions Lifted Amid Debate Over Class Action Ban May 20, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsAs legal challenges continue over Charles Schwabs requirement that clients waive their right to file class action lawsuits, the brokerage firm has decided to temporarily lift the lawsuit restriction.ย Until last week, a controversial provision in Charles Schwab account agreements waived a client’s ability to participate in class action litigation if a dispute arises over the handling of their account, requiring any legal disagreements go through arbitration.However, in a statement issued last week, Charles Schwab indicates that it is modifying the agreements to eliminate the class action lawsuit waiver for events that occur on or after May 15, 2013. While the company indicates that the change will apply to events for the “foreseeable future,” they have indicated that the waiver is only being removed until the validity of the waiver is resolved by the appropriate regulatory agency or court.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe announcement comes as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) continues to challenge Schwab’s right to stop clients from bringing class action lawsuits.FINRA is an independent regulator for all securities firms doing business in the United States, providing arbitration services for claims against stock brokers and serving to protect investors by making sure the securities industry operates fairly and honestly. The organization oversees about 4,275 brokerage firms, about 161,495 branch offices and more than 630,000 securities representatives.Earlier this year, a hearing was held after FINRA brought three counts against Charles Schwab over the changes originally made last year to customer agreements. The revision affected more than 8.8 million Schwab customers at the time. While a panel of arbitrators determinedย that the Schwab customer agreements violate FINRA rules, it concluded that FINRA is unable to enforce those rules due to a conflict with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), thus upholding the use of the agreement.FINRA is appealing the ruling to the National Adjudicatory Council.According to the recent statement released by Schab, the company indicates that it still believes that dispute resolution is best handled through FINRA arbitration, rather than pursuing class action lawsuits, Schwab indicates that it is voluntarily removing the waiver to avoid uncertainty for clients.“While the company believes that dispute resolution is best handled via FINRA arbitration, we have chosen to voluntarily remove the waiver going forward until the issue is resolved by the appropriate regulatory and/or court decisions,” the Schwab statement reads. “Given that the process will likely take considerable time to resolve, and may leave clients with a degree of uncertainty about their dispute resolution options in the meantime, we have elected to remove that uncertainty until the legal and regulatory process is completed.”Schwab modified their customer agreements after paying more than $100 million toย settle class action lawsuits over misleading marketing materialsย associated with their YieldPlus funds, which were ultra-short bond funds sold as conservative investment alternatives to money market funds. The lawsuits were filed after the fund lost more than 30% of its value between June 2007 and June 2008, resulting in huge losses for investors who claimed that Schwab failed to adequately disclose the nature of the risks. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Charles Schwab, Class Action Lawsuit, FINRA, FINRA Arbitration, Schwab YieldPlus Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation April 20, 2026 Lawsuits Over Cartiva Real-World Failure Rates Continue To Roll Into MDL April 20, 2026 Barton Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Claims Explosion Resulted in Third- and Fourth-Degree Burns April 20, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: yesterday)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026) Passenger in Uber Sexual Assault Trial Tells Jury She Feared Driver Knowing Her Address (Posted: 4 days ago)The second federal Uber sexual assault bellwether trial is underway in North Carolina, involving claims a woman was groped and had to flee from the driver.MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITMDL Judge Appoints Lyft Sexual Assault Lawyers to Leadership Positions (03/30/2026)Lawsuit Claims Lyft Driver Sexually Assaulted Woman With Her Children in the Back Seat (03/26/2026)Uber Settlements Reached To Resolve Certain Sexual Assault Lawsuits (03/18/2026) Jury Selection Underway in First Bard PowerPort Trial Over Infection Claims (Posted: 5 days ago)The first Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial commences next week involving claims that a man suffered a severe infection due to the port catheter’s allegedly defective design.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Blocks Juries From Hearing About IVC Filter Problems in Bard PowerPort Trials (04/08/2026)Port-a-Cath Lawsuit Alleges Power P.A.C. Break Down Resulted in Serious Port Catheter Infection (03/31/2026)Final Pretrial Conference in Bard PowerPort Lawsuit To Be Held April 9 (03/27/2026)
SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation April 20, 2026
Barton Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Claims Explosion Resulted in Third- and Fourth-Degree Burns April 20, 2026
SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: yesterday)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)
Passenger in Uber Sexual Assault Trial Tells Jury She Feared Driver Knowing Her Address (Posted: 4 days ago)The second federal Uber sexual assault bellwether trial is underway in North Carolina, involving claims a woman was groped and had to flee from the driver.MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITMDL Judge Appoints Lyft Sexual Assault Lawyers to Leadership Positions (03/30/2026)Lawsuit Claims Lyft Driver Sexually Assaulted Woman With Her Children in the Back Seat (03/26/2026)Uber Settlements Reached To Resolve Certain Sexual Assault Lawsuits (03/18/2026)
Jury Selection Underway in First Bard PowerPort Trial Over Infection Claims (Posted: 5 days ago)The first Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial commences next week involving claims that a man suffered a severe infection due to the port catheter’s allegedly defective design.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Blocks Juries From Hearing About IVC Filter Problems in Bard PowerPort Trials (04/08/2026)Port-a-Cath Lawsuit Alleges Power P.A.C. Break Down Resulted in Serious Port Catheter Infection (03/31/2026)Final Pretrial Conference in Bard PowerPort Lawsuit To Be Held April 9 (03/27/2026)