Shoulder Dystocia Lawsuit Results in $4.2M Jury Award Over Birth Injury

A Pennsylvania family has been awarded $4.2 million in damages for a shoulder dystocia birth injury, which was allegedly caused by medical malpractice during delivery.ย 

The case was brought by Marian Leoma, over a severe should injury suffered at birth by her child, Jenniyah Georges. According to a report by the Connecticut Law Tribune, the lawsuit was filed against Ob-Gyn Services and a certified nurse midwife, who allegedly failed to apply the proper technique.

Georges suffered permanent nerve damage occurred when her shoulder became caught on the mother’s pubic bone during delivery in 2009. The birth injury left Georges with a life-long shoulder injury, where her right arm is shorter than the other, weakened, and suffers from limited mobility.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Should dystocia, which is also commonly referred to as Erbโ€™s palsy or a brachial plexus injury, involves shoulder paralysis caused by permanent nerve damage. In many cases the injury is linked to medical mistakes or neglect during delivery, occurring when the babyโ€™s shoulder gets stuck in the motherโ€™s pelvic bone and medical providers do not take the proper steps to address the problem.

According to the complaint, the defendants failed to diagnose that the child, now seven years old, had her shoulder stuck in Leoma’s birth canal and claimed that they grabbed onto the baby’s head and tried to twist and turn her free, resulting in injury.

Following a six-day trial that ended last Friday in Connecticut Superior Court, a jury awarded Georges and her family $4.2 million. The jury came to the decision after nearly eight hours of deliberation.

During the trial, the midwife denied the allegations that she had used the incorrect procedure.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials.
Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation.
More than 3,300 women have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits in federal court, with several hundred more also pending in state courts in New York and Delaware, according to a recent status report.