Side Effects of Invokana Put Stress On Kidneys, Lawsuit Claims

|

According to allegations raised in a kidney failure lawsuit filed over the side effects of Invokana, the new generation diabetes drug places additional stress on the kidneys for certain individuals.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by James W. Brown in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on November 7, indicating that Johnson & Johnson, its Janssen Pharmaceuticals subsidiary and Mitsubushi Tanabe Pharma Corp. failed to provide adequate warnings for users and the medical community about the serious kidney risks.

Invokana (canagliflozin) is a new type of diabetes drug introduced in early 2013, working in a unique way by inhibiting some normal kidney functions to increase the amount of sugar excreted in the urine. It was the first member of a new generation of medications, known as sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which also includes the blockbuster drugs Invokamet, Faxiga, Jardiance and others.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Although the medications have been promoted as superior treatments to prior diabetes drugs, as more users have switched to Invokana or other SGLT2 inhibitors, serious questions about the safety and side effects of the medications have emerged.

Brown indicates that he began taking Invokana in October 2014, and suffered kidney failure in November 2014. As a result of the complications allegedly caused by Invokana, Brown claims that he required multiple days of hospitalization and has been left with permanent injuries and damages.

According to the lawsuit, Invokana place stress on the kidney, as the drug is designed to route excess glucose through the kidneys and out through the urine.

“SGLT2 inhibitors, including Invokana, inhibit renal glucose reabsorption through the SGLT2 receptor in the proximal renal tubules, causing glucose to be excreted through the urinary tract,” the lawsuit states. “This puts additional stress on the kidneys in patients already at risk for kidney disease.”

The complaint indicates that the drug makers knew or should have known about the Invokana risk of kidney failure and other problems associated with the medication, yet failed to warn patients, instead continuing to defend the safety of Invokana, mislead physicians and the public, and minimize unfavorable findings.

In May 2015, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) conducted a detailed review of adverse event reports submitted to the FDA during the first year Invokana was on the market, and identified a potential risk of kidney damage with Invokana and other SGLT2 inhibitors, raising questions about whether the benefits provided by the medication justify the risk.

In June 2016, the FDA required the drug makers to add new Invokana safety warning, indicating that the medication may increase the risk of acute kidney injury and other severe health problems.

Brown’s case joins a growing number of similar Invokana lawsuits filed in courts nationwide. In addition to kidney failure cases, a number diabetic ketoacidosis lawsuits and heart attack lawsuits have been filed over other side effects associated with the medication.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Nitrous oxide injury lawsuits are emerging as medical evidence links recreational use of the gas to nerve damage that can cause numbness, balance problems and difficulty walking, often without adequate side effect warnings.
A federal judge has scheduled a series of Bard PowerPort trials between April 2026 and February 2027, which will focus on allegations that defective design flaws made the devices susceptible to infections, fractures and migration.
A federal judge is calling for dozens of attorneys to reapply for leadership positions in Depo-Provera brain tumor litigation before their appointments expire in March.