Smith & Nephew Hip Manufacturing Problems Result in FDA Warning

Federal investigators have issued a warning to Smith & Nephew PLC about quality control problems that need to be corrected at a plant that manufactures hip replacement implants. 

The FDA sent a warning letter to the U.K. company on December 21, calling for corrective actions at its Tuttlingen, Germany, production facility. The plant is responsible for the manufacturing of the R3 Ceramic Acetabular System, but the FDA says that its processes to validate and verify the quality of its products lack in a number of areas.

The letter stems from FDA inspections of the plant that occurred in July. The company initially sent a response to the FDA addressing its concerns, but the response was deemed insufficient, according to the warning letter.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Among the problems that the inspectors found was a failure to confirm the validity of the plant’s minimum and maximum settings for a titanium ring press. Inspectors also said that the plant failed to verify that corrective actions taken to fix a problem where radiation-sterilized parts were not getting enough radiation were actually working. When the problem recurred later, the plant blamed it on employees not following the new procedures.

The FDA inspectors said that attempts by the plant to address the problems had failed because there were no procedures to make sure that the fixes were actually working. As a result, a number of problems that the plant had supposedly addressed cropped up again.

The company has 15 days to respond to the letter. If it fails to respond or adequately address the FDA’s concerns, its parts could be seized when they try to ship them to the U.S. without warning.

In 2007, Smith & Nephew agreed to pay $28.9 million to the U.S. Department of Justice over kickbacks it paid U.S. doctors to implant their hip and knee devices into patients. As a result, the company underwent 18 months of federal monitoring.


58 Comments


Valerie
I had a rt. total titanium hip replacement with the Smith- Nephew parts and I haven’t had 1 day without pain and limp!!!!! I live a life of pain and lots of sleepless nights.

Howard
the parts were Smith & Nephew, I had hip replaced in 2007. To my knowledge Smith & Nephew have not compinsated anyone, on record. I believe the Senate has formed a sub-committee to hear complaints as to the metal on metal hip replacements. I believe the key to pursuing litigation is have a case go through the court systems. This will enable us and attorney to see what descovery issues need be answered, in order to succeed in court.

Jose
Howard and Rosemary; I just met with a New York attorney and my doctor today. I had a bhr done in 2006 and had to get it revised in 2010.

Rosemary
I have 2 Smith & Nephew titantium hip replacements (2007 & 2008) Metallosis has developed around both with “lakes” of fluid causing pain, grinding & popping. Revisions have been proposed as the only solution. Does anyone know if Smith & Nephew is paying damages for these hip replacements?

Barb
Pete — Wondered what is the manufacturer of your recalled parts? Is it Smith & Nephew or a different manufacturer. Also – when did you have your hip replaced?

Howard
spent 9 months in hospital due problems with Smith & Nephew BHR hip replacement. Looking for anybody or any additional information as to reported problems with this device or on going litigation. I am not an attorney. responses deeply appreciated

Pete
Just found out they recalled all the parts in question and one of those parts is in my left hip! What a great way to start spring!

MITZI
MY HUSBAND HAD A HIP REPLACEMENT WIITH A SMITH AND NEPHEW SPECTRUM HIP ON jULY 26, 2004. WE LIVED IN DELRAY BEACH, FL AT THE TIME AND WERE TOLD THAT THE HIP REPLACEMENT HAD TO BE REPLACED AGAIN. THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THE STRESS MISMATCH BETWEEN THE METAL HEAD AND THE ACETABULIM. SMALL FRACTURES WERE RECCURRING AND HE WAS IN A GREAT DEAL OF PAIN.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Cartiva implant lawsuit blames the manufacturer for failing to warn patients about high failure rates for years after it began receiving implant complication reports.
Lawsuits against Bard and AngioDynamics have been consolidated in separate MDLs, alleging that design defects in their implantable port catheter systems caused severe infections that were not properly disclosed.