Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Starbucks Coffee Grinder Recall: Blade Grinders Pose Risk of Lacerations June 17, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your CommentsCoffee giant Starbucks has issued a recall for more than half a million coffee grinders sold under their Starbucks Barista and Seattle’s Best Coffee brands, as reports have been received of the grinders failing to turn off or turning on unexpectedly, posing a potential laceration hazard for consumers.The Starbucks coffee grinder recall was announced on Tuesday by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), indicating that at least 176 reports of problems with the grinders have been received, including at least three people who suffered injuries to their hands when the grinder turned on unexpectedly during cleaning.About 530,000 grinders sold between March 2002 and March 2009 for about $30 are included in the recall. The grinders were made by Tsann Zuen (Zangzhou) Enterprise Co. Ltd., of China, and imported into the United States by Starbucks Coffee Co., of Seattle, Washington.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know About…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONStarbucks Barista Blade Grinder was sold in stainless steel, green, pink, orange, teal, cranberry, olive and black, and had SKU numbers 171884, 195234, 195235, 220623, 220624, 242275, 344476, and 454482. Seattle’s Best Coffee Blade Grinder was sold in brown metallic and has SKU number 474881.The CPSC and Starbucks recommend consumers stop using the recalled coffee grinders immediately and contact Starbucks to receive a free replacement grinder. However, product liability lawyers recommend that if any cuts or damage were caused by Starbucks coffee grinders turning on unexpectedly, the product should be preserved in a manner designed to avoid future use until appropriate testing can be completed.More Lawsuit Stories SmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Woman’s Body May 15, 2026 Therapeutic Heating Pad Lawsuit Alleges Amazon Device Overheated, Burned User May 15, 2026 FDA Issues Additional Tazverik Blood Cancer Warnings After Market Recall May 15, 2026 21 Comments Nick January 6, 2011 ‘@Laura – the exact same thing just happened to me yesterday! It wont do anything! Laura November 24, 2010 You recalled my grinder that was a gift and replaced it and now this one has just stopped working James October 28, 2010 I am so glad that I read the published information here on this site. I have two of the coffee grinders and have had zero problems with them. I stopped going to Star Bucks about 2 years ago after getting the worst customer service I have ever rec’d from a company. I was trying to get my Pikes peak coffee replaced as it had a lot of oil in the bag. Getting it replaced was like having 14 teeth pulled. Never again Star Bucks. You will never have my business again! Anyone that I see, talk to or hear talking about Star Bucks, I will let them know what a F— Up company you really are! Funny maybe that is why my two coffee grinders are working and shutting off just fine! Brian October 18, 2010 I’ve been trying to replace my recalled grinder for two months now and never seem to receive the shipping label from Starbucks. The first time I called I was notified the shipping label would be mailed to me via USPS and would take 4 weeks to arrive. Six weeks later, no label. I called again, this time they said they would email me – no email in 4 days. I’m glad I read the comments on this page, as I’m going to just keep my grinder. Now I know I’m not the only person having problems with Starbucks customer service. The associates are very nice on the phone, but there is no follow through! I’m going to make a strong effort to purchase coffee, food, and related products from somewhere else. I’m sick of the crappy customer service received from this exchange. I’ll do just fine at Wegman’s, Giant, or the A&P. Charlie August 30, 2010 I echo the comments above. My stainless steel grinder was replaced with a very cheap looking hunk of black plastic. I should never have sent my in. It worked fine. Jenta May 30, 2010 Atleast most of you got one back. I have NEVER received my replacement after consistent phone calls and promises that someone would contact me…..that never happened either! Bruce April 12, 2010 I wish I’d seen these comments also. My stainless steel grinder was working just fine. This black plastic piece of junk they sent me is an embarrassment. S January 18, 2010 Geez… I sent in a nice stainless steel blade grinder (it was working just fine) that cost me $35 and what did I get back? A a total piece of plastic cheap junk! C’mon, did the genius VP’s at Starbuck’s really think the consumers wouldn’t notice the poor quality of the replacement??? The damage to their image and reputation is incalculable… and they won’t ever buy it back from me, friends or family! I’m taking my business to that “other” coffee place in town – and besides, Starbucks’s hasn’t been able to brew a decent Cup-O-Joe for a few years now… Take your Pikes whatever-it-is coffee and stick it! Bye-Bye Starbucks! CINDY January 14, 2010 CAN I GET A NEW MODEL? will December 6, 2009 We received our replacement grinder and it broke within a few weeks…..what a joke. Kimberly November 12, 2009 I sent my Starbuck’s grinder in 3 weeks ago, and just got my replacement today. It looks like the exact same kind of grinder, but with the nicely polished exterior run through with a grinder, and then spray painted in black. I don’t see a real difference, and it’s from the same manufacturer. It DID come with an instruction booklet, which tells you that before you open it to empty the ground coffee, to unplug it first. If these instructions were the only difference, I’d suggest they just send a booklet to all the owners, and save the cost of UPS shipping. My new one is ugly, and rough to the touch. I guess I have no recourse at this time. eye September 11, 2009 Send mine back and we will send you another one in 4 weeks? I can save $60 a month from not buying a cup of your Pikes Peak or whatever you call it now. I’ll throw my grinder away and buy one AND my coffee from another store. Goodbye Star(not my) bucks bonnie August 31, 2009 I just called regarding the recall… i am not sure what to do now… the grinder that they are recalling certainly was not cheap… what is the name of the brand of the grinder that they are replacing it with? I am afraid to send mine back… mine does not want to shut off… I plug it in when I am going to use it… m.b.mcgee August 31, 2009 I’m glad I looked at these comments before I sent mine in. I will keep my grinder and just never stick my fingers in there while its plugged in! which duh i wouldn’t do anyway why would anyone stick there fingers in a grinder that was pluged in!,unbelivable. I have always used a little brush to clean mine, its a “grinder” people. Shouldn’t the words fingers and grinder give you some pause. absolutly unbelievable! D L August 26, 2009 I wish I had read the comments before returning my nice looking metal grinder. The black plastic one I got back looks like a 99 cent store purchase. Very disappointed! Kim August 25, 2009 I received my replacement grinder yesterday. I sent in a stainless steel grinder and received a cheap black plastic grinder. What? Really? Cheap, cheap, cheap. Shame on Starbuck’s! Aaron August 25, 2009 I also just received my replacement grinder, and actually received the same exact grinder in black. So what was the point? I can see that the little button that caused the problem by getting ground coffee stuck in it is THE SAME, so I don’t see how they fixed the problem at all! They sent me a new version with the same exact design flaw. How are they saying they fixed the defect? I already bought a new grinder since I wasn’t waiting 8 weeks without one, so i guess i’ll just throw this one away. Scott August 14, 2009 The replacement is a piece of junk, if you haven’t sent your original back, just keep it and don’t put your fingers near the blade when plugged in. pist off customer August 8, 2009 i too just received the replacement grinder and is so bad looking that I’m just going to return this piece of junk. the lid does not close well and the blades take longer to grind my coffee than the other one I had, which by the way was not bad. i had it for 4 years and never had a problem with it. i just wanted to get a black version of the same grinder. according to the person on the phone when I called to inquire about this recall he said that the grinder replacing the one i had was much better and better looking. i got it 2 weeks ago and I am about to put it in the trash. i dont want to even donate this piece of junk. Ia August 5, 2009 I just received the replacement and it looks like a joke! The lid does not close it looks awful. I am sure that grinder from a dollar stores are better than the replacement. What I spend on buying and sending the recalled product was much more than this strange object that they send me. I will not be buying any appliances at Starbucks after this. lynoak July 8, 2009 It will take EIGHT WEEKS for the replacement to arrive. PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES SmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Woman’s Body (Posted: 2 days ago)A Missouri woman alleges her AngioDynamics SmartPort catheter fractured and left a broken piece near her heart, requiring surgical removal after it was found during a CT scan.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUIT18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (04/09/2026) Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Cleared For MDL Trial in July 2026 (Posted: 3 days ago)A federal judge has selected an Enfamil lawsuit to serve as the first NEC infant formula bellwether trial, which is set to begin in July.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Cow’s Milk-Based Baby Formula Use Resulted in Infant Suffering Devastating NEC Symptoms (05/08/2026)Mead Johnson Lawsuit Claims Premature Child Developed NEC From Enfamil (04/24/2026)Similac NEC Lawsuit Payout Increased by $17M in Punitive Damages (04/14/2026) Abbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (Posted: 4 days ago)According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)
SmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Woman’s Body (Posted: 2 days ago)A Missouri woman alleges her AngioDynamics SmartPort catheter fractured and left a broken piece near her heart, requiring surgical removal after it was found during a CT scan.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUIT18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (04/09/2026)
Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Cleared For MDL Trial in July 2026 (Posted: 3 days ago)A federal judge has selected an Enfamil lawsuit to serve as the first NEC infant formula bellwether trial, which is set to begin in July.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Cow’s Milk-Based Baby Formula Use Resulted in Infant Suffering Devastating NEC Symptoms (05/08/2026)Mead Johnson Lawsuit Claims Premature Child Developed NEC From Enfamil (04/24/2026)Similac NEC Lawsuit Payout Increased by $17M in Punitive Damages (04/14/2026)
Abbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (Posted: 4 days ago)According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)