Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Stryker Hip Implant Failures May Be Caused by LFIT V40 Femoral Head, Manufacturer Warns October 7, 2016 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsStryker Corp. is warning orthopedic surgeons that it has received a higher-then-expected number of reports involving hip failures associated with implants containing a specific femoral head manufactured prior to 2011, raising concerns about thousands of artificial hip implanted in recent years.In an urgent medical device product field action notification (PDF) sent to health care professionals worldwide on August 29, the orthopedic device manufacturer warns of “potential hazards” associated with its LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 Femoral Heads.At issue are problems where the femoral head connects to the femoral neck, known as a taper lock failure. This can lead to a total hip implant failure, causing extreme pain, problems walking, and requiring revision surgery.Stay Up-to-Date Abouthip replacement lawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new hip replacement lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutHip Replacement LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new hip replacement lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn More“Stryker has received higher than expected complaints of taper lock failure for specific lots of the following certain sizes of LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40TM Femoral Heads manufactured prior to 2011,” the letter states, providing a listing of catalog numbers, head diameters and offsets for affected components.While the action has not been specifically labeled a Stryker hip recall, such a letter may end up classified that way by the FDA, as healthcare providers are being told to check their inventory and “quarantine all subject devices pending return to Stryker.” In addition, the letter specifies contact procedures if doctors “have any question related to this recall….”For individuals who already received a Stryker hip replacement with the LFIT v40 femoral head, doctors are being urged to be on the look out for problems where the femoral head may disassociated with the hip stem, fracture, release excessive metal debris or cause symptoms such as:Pain, discomfort or annoyanceLoss of mobilityInflammationAdverse local tissue reactionDislocationJoint instabilityLooseningPeriprosthetic fractureLeg length discrepancyOther problems requiring hip revision surgeryAccording to the letter, doctors have been asked to inform the manufacturer of any problems with Stryker LFit v40 hip implants, and to comply with regulations regarding notication of adverse events to regulatory authorities. However, it is unclear whether consumers who received the femoral heads will be notified directly that they may have a recalled hip replacement component.Late last month, the Australian Therapeutic goods Administration reiterated the warning, and urged doctors to follow up with patients who had been implanted with the affected component.In 2014, a number of lawsuits were filed in U.S. courts indicating that users had experienced Stryker LFIT V40 femoral head problems, alleging that the components were defectively designed and manufactured.It is unknown at this time whether U.S. regulators will issue similar warnings, or potential require the manufacturer to formally issue a Stryker LFIT V40 femoral head hip recall. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Hip Implant, Hip Replacement System, Stryker, Stryker LFitMore Hip Replacements Lawsuit Stories Biomet Hip Lawsuit Filed Over Defective M2A Metal-on-Metal Implant December 26, 2024 Zimmer Biomet Lawsuit Filed Over RibFix Blu Implant Fracture September 25, 2024 Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024 0 CommentsLinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: today)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026) 10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (04/01/2026)Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026) High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)A Depo-Provera lawsuit indicates that a Washington state woman must receive ongoing medical monitoring and brain scans due to a high-risk brain tumor allegedly caused by the birth control shot.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)Depo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)
Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: today)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)
10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (04/01/2026)Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)
High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)A Depo-Provera lawsuit indicates that a Washington state woman must receive ongoing medical monitoring and brain scans due to a high-risk brain tumor allegedly caused by the birth control shot.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)Depo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)