Subway Train Accident Lawsuit Results in Verdict for Intoxicated Man

A New York City jury returned a verdict of $3,594,943 in a subway train accident lawsuit filed by a 25 year old man who fell onto the tracks while intoxicated and lost his right leg when it as run over by a train.

The lawsuit was was filed against the New York City Transit Authority alleging that the train operator was negligent for failing to stop the train when an unknown mass was seen on the tracks more than 180 feet away.

The subway accident occurred around 1:50 a.m. on April 23, 2006, at the 14th Street – Union Square station on the local southbound “N” line. The plaintiff, who had a 0.18% blood alcohol level at the time of the incident, had been drinking with friends and had no memory of how he ended up on the tracks.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

During trial, it was established that the subway train driver saw a “mass” on the track from over 180 feet away. The plaintiff argued that the driver was negligent for not stopping the train when he had time to do so, regardless of whether the object was an intoxicated person.

On February 9, 2009, the jury found that the New York City Transit Authority was liable for the plaintiff’s injuries and awarded nearly $3.6 million for pain, suffering and medical expenses.

Under the New York comparative negligence law, the jury found that the plaintiff was 35% responsible for his own injuries.

Although some states still follow the contributory negligence system in personal injury lawsuits, which would have barred the plaintiff from recovery any compensation because he was found to be partially at fault for the incident, New York follows the contributory negligence system, where the financial recovery can be decreased in proportion to the fault attributed to the plaintiff.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Family Seeks Remand of Bard Hernia Mesh Wrongful Death Lawsuit, After Global Settlement Negotiations “Have Dragged”
Family Seeks Remand of Bard Hernia Mesh Wrongful Death Lawsuit, After Global Settlement Negotiations “Have Dragged” (Posted today)

The Bard hernia mesh lawsuit has been pending for years in the federal MDL, where family indicates global settlement negotiations have stalled, leading to a request to allow their claim to be remanded for trial.

AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit Filed Over Contaminated Water in Colorado Springs
AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuit Filed Over Contaminated Water in Colorado Springs (Posted yesterday)

Lawsuit blames PFAS manufacturers for failing to prevent water contamination by their chemicals, or warn municipalities and the public about the potential risks of ulcerative colitis and other diseases as a result of exposure.

Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria
Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria (Posted 2 days ago)

Hundreds of currently pending Bard PowerPort lawsuits over infections, fractures and migration injuries were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), but now even more claims present similar allegations that the implantable port catheter system has dangerous design defects that were not adequately disclosed by the manufacturer.