Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Most Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths Are Linked to Unsafe Sleeping Areas: StudyCPSC has been targeting unsafe infant sleeping arrangements, initiating a ban on inclined infant sleepers and crib bumpers last year. However, it continues to be the most common cause of unexpected infant deaths. February 23, 2024 Katherine McDaniel Add Your CommentsMost infants who die unexpectedly before their first birthday were sharing a bed with parent or sibling, and many were placed in an unsafe sleeping position, according to the findings of a new study.Researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that more than half of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) cases were linked to a babyโs sleeping environment, including where they slept, what position they were placed in to sleep, and if they were sleeping with another individual, according to findings of a new study published this month in the medical journal Pediatrics.The study examined SUID data from 2011 and 2020 reported to the CDC’s SUID Case Registry. The data included infant death reports from 23 states that were due to SUID, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), unintentional sleep-related asphyxia, suffocation, strangulation, cardiac or respiratory arrest, or other unknown causes.SUID Linked to Sleeping ArrangementsAccording to the data, 59.5% of infants who suddenly died before one year old were sleeping with someone else when they died. Researchers also identified multiple unsafe sleeping practices among at least 76% of all SUID cases.Approximately 8,192 SUID cases occurred during the study period, and researchers analyzed of those 7,595 cases, after excluding those with missing or unknown data. The data revealed that over half of the infants that died shared sleeping surfaces with others, with 68.2% sharing beds with an adult, and 75.9% sleeping in an adult bed when they died.Among infants who co-slept with others, over 73% were under three months old, and nearly 80% were sleeping in an adult bed. Nearly 70% shared beds with one or more adults, 21.9% slept with adults and other children, and 7.6% slept with other children.Soft bedding around the sleeping area was reported in 68.3% of those cases, among several other contributing factors that made their sleeping environment unsafe. At least 31% were sleeping on a surface with soft bedding or loose objects nearby, slept outside of a crib or bassinet, and were placed on their side or stomach.BABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITSWas your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil?Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITSWas your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil?Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONResearchers found 87.2% of SUID involving bed sharing were supervised by a parent at time of death, and 16.3% were supervised by someone impaired by drugs or alcohol. They also found 18.6% of co-sleeping infant homes did not have a crib.Households with multiple infants had more instances of bed sharing compared to those with only one baby, according to the findings. Among those cases, 73.1% slept in the same bed, and 25.8% were placed on an unsafe sleeping surface and in an unsafe sleeping position.The findings suggest shared sleeping surfaces, sleeping on the side or back, and sleeping on soft bedding or in anything other than a crib may be linked to SUID. Researchers indicate the findings can help educate parents and caregivers on safe sleeping practices for babies, which may help prevent SUID cases.Ban on Inclined Infant Sleepers and Crib BumpersFederal regulators have been warning that unsafe sleeping arrangements, often in the form of padding placed in the crib or inclined sleeping devices, are a high risk to young children in recent years.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned inclined infant sleepers and crib bumpers from the market in August 2023, after they were linked to a number of infant deaths caused by suffocation and asphyxiation.The ban established safety standards to address hazards posed by millions of infant sleep products following years of reports involving infants dying after they rolled over and became trapped against the fabric.The relatively new rules banned sleep products intended for infants under five months of age from exceeding an elevation of 10 degrees. They also banned padded crib bumpers, vinyl bumper guards, and vertical slat crib covers with fabric or material that cover or block access to the cribโs side opening, and required compliance testing for infant sleep products currently on the market. Tags: Crib Bumper, Cribs, Inclined Sleeper, Infant, Infant Deaths, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Suffocation Find Out If You Qualify for Infant Formula NEC CompensationMore Baby Formula Lawsuit Stories Mead Johnson Lawsuit Over Enfamil NEC Risks Results in Defense Verdict September 1, 2026 Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits August 21, 2026 Missouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit August 20, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026) Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026) Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)