Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Texas Yamaha Rhino Lawsuit Results in Defense Verdict August 28, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your Comments A Texas jury has found that Yamaha Motor Corp. is not liable for the death of a 13-year-old boy in a Yamaha Rhino wrongful death lawsuit filed over fatal injuries suffered in a rollover accident, which the plaintiffs had contended were caused by design defects in the side-by-side ATV. After about two hours of deliberation on August 27, a jury in Orange County, Texas, ruled in favor of Yamaha in a product liability case brought by the parents of Forest “Eddie” Ray, who was 13 years-old when he died in September 2007 while operating the off-road vehicle. The case was the first of about 500 pending Yamaha Rhino lawsuits to go to trial, but the jury finding will not be binding in any other cases. The jury decision was based on the individual circumstances of this case, including the fact that Ray was only 13 years old while driving the ATV and his father testified that he was not wearing a helmet when the vehicle flipped, crushing him. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Since it was first introduced in 2003, problems with the Yamaha Rhino have been linked to hundreds of ATV rollover accidents throughout the United States, often resulting in serious or fatal injuries. While Yamaha has maintained that there is nothing defective about the design, earlier this year they temporarily halted Rhino sales and agreed to make free safety modifications to about 145,000 Rhino ATVs already on the market. The Rhino modifications were made following pressure from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), which has indicated that the vehicles can rollover even at low speeds on level terrain. Plaintiffs in other cases will continue to push forward against Yamaha, claiming that the manufacturer cut corners to save costs and sold a vehicle with a defective design that makes it prone to rollover. Despite the verdict, Yamaha Rhino lawyers are continuing to pursue claims for plaintiffs, arguing that the evidence establishes that the manufacturer cut corners to save costs during the design of the vehicle, and sold an ATV that is prone to rollover and lacks many safety features. All federal lawsuits over Yamaha Rhino accidents are currently consolidated for pretrial litigation in an MDL, or Multidistrict Litigation, before U.S. District Judge Jennifer B. Coffman in the Western District of Kentucky. The current scheduling order calls for the first federal Yamaha Rhino trial to begin in June 2010. Tags: ATV, Product Liability, Rhino, Wrongful Death, Yamaha, Yamaha Rhino Image Credit: 2008 Yamaha Rhino 700 More Lawsuit Stories Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails May 20, 2025 Settlement Talks in Sterile Water Infection Lawsuit To Be Held in Nov. 2025 May 20, 2025 Taurine Found in Energy Drinks Linked to Increased Blood Cancer Risks: Study May 20, 2025 9 Comments J May 1, 2023 I’ve owned 7 or 8 rhino 660 since they came out in 2004.. I’ve had 2 2004 1 2005 3 2006 and 2 of the 2007 models. I’ve drove them on a daily basis on concrete asphalt grass in the mountains. In pastures on streets and crossed rivers. I have one 2007 I ride today. I’ve never came close to turning one over. I guess some people can’t drive very well. eddie January 12, 2011 william.the same thing happened to me and a friend we were on leval ground wet grass actually.stoped to turn into barn to put it up I was 45yrs old at time and have owned several motorcycles.when we turned and gave it some gas turning left the right front tire rolledover so much the rim dug into the ground rolling us over on the pass side of vehicle my friend 38 yrs old suffered a laseration on the right side of head taking 9 staples to closse the wound and it broke his seat.I flew out the top landing on my back causing sevier brusing and muscle damage we were going ten miles per hr.this was in 2005 i hope something was done to keep people from Under estimating how slow you can go to get seariously hurt on a rhino William January 1, 2011 Christopher you preach and preach on responsibility. What of all the people that have rolled over and been hurt following the safety guidelines. What of the people that were hurt before they had safety guidelines. The first recall Yamaha did on the rhino was to add the safety stickers and warnings. At the time these people lost their child, there were no safety guidelines. You want the parents to be responsible but your failing to see that they are. They have/are suffering for the loss of their child. You want Yamaha to sit with squeaky clean hands while the parents take all the blame. Children CAN NOT be treated as porcelain put up on a shelf. The way you people go on about this, children should be on a 2 foot leash until they are eighteen. As a parent you have to let them out from under your wing. A multi-billion dollar corporation should have the means to make sure their product is safe. For WHATEVER reason someone is on the thing, it should do what it is advertised to do. The parents have their part of the blame but so does yamaha. The parents suffer for this accident every day, what about Yamaha. I spent my childhood on 4-wheelers 3-wheelers and dirtbikes. I grew up and started riding street bikes. I was on a slightly rocky red clay road. We came to a complete stop and turned around to the left to go the other direction. Coming from a stand still accelerating slowly the rhino tipped over to the passenger side anyway. I was the passenger. Even though I was wearing my seat belt my leg went out the side of the vehicle and the rhino landed on my leg just above my ankle. It broke my ankle and severed the ligaments and tendons in my ankle. As an adhd child I broke “alot” of bones as a child. I have never before, and, never again felt pain like what I felt that day. I have been riding for a long time and understand full well what these vehicles should be capable of. So for you and every other redneck that wants to criticize people, especially people that have just lost a child; Keep Riding, by all means please. Christopher June 5, 2010 “Parents don’t know how dangerous they are when they buy them” BS I have yet to see an ATV or UTV that did not CLEARLY have a warning that you could be seriously injured or killed while riding it. If you then choose to go ahead and ride it and you get injured or killed, then you accepted that risk knowing it was a possibity. Afterall, you can live through life just fine without ever riding in a rhino, getting in it and riding it is a risk you willingly take. Just like going swimming, you can swim and accept that it is possible you may drown, or choose not to swim and eliminate that chance. But if you DO swim and then drown, it is ridiculous to sue the pool manufacturer because actions you took eliminated yourself. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY needs to be ressurected in America before it is too late .. . . .. Christopher June 5, 2010 Give me a break George. Excuses excuses excuses is all you spew. It ABSOLUTELY. comes down to the parents on this one. They don’t know the danger when they buy one? What????? If they cared they would make it their business to research before buying, but common sense should tell anyone a 13 year old shouldn’t be in control of 40 or more horsepower, and further I bet it says in the owners manual there is a chance of rollover, moving ahead with the purchase and ignoring warnings in my world means you accept the risk.. Kids riding them and their parents don’t know?????? LOL that AGAIN comes back to parenting. I guess. In your world yamaha is liable for kids doing things they are not supposed to be doing. Kid goes and steals one, crashes and dies, but the parents didn’t know he was doing it so that makes it OK and at the same time lands responsibility on the maker for selling it. Never mind that the maker also didn’t know and didn’t condone it either. Ridiculous. Get real. I am so tired of crybaby people like you who refuse to make people accountable for their own actions. George January 25, 2010 I understand that these cases must stand on their individual merit, but these vehicles are inherently dangerous. The only way to improve them is to hold the manufacturers accountable because they are aware of the problems. It’s not about “standing up to the lawyers” but standing up to corporations who make dangerous vehicles. It’s also not about making parents responsible…sometimes kids are riding these things and the parents have no knowledge. Parents also don’t know how dangerous they are when they buy them for their children. Dannielle, just remember, when you send an email to a public forum like this, and condemn the parents of a dead child, you are passing judgment without knowledge of all of the facts. When you do this, you show utter disrespect for these parents who probably still are grieving for their child. Norman sat thru the trial, so I appreciate his comments, but you did not. So be careful about heaping condemnation on these grieving parents. Dannielle September 1, 2009 it’s about time someone stood up for facts instead of the free lotto mentality so prevalent today in courtrooms across the US. where were this child’s parents while he was out joyridig without any safety gearin a mdified vehicle? PARENTS stop acting as if the world is your babysitter and you are entitled to something for your irresponsible actions. I’m sorry your child died but you could have prevented this. S.E. August 29, 2009 I just want to THANK YOU for your service, and for the decision you and your fellow jurors made. Not only was your decision at this trial important, but I feel that it will be an important decision for future trials as well. As a Rhino owner, and motorsports enthusiast, I have been waiting a long time for someone to stand up to the lawyers and let everyone know that there IS such a thing as “personal responsibility”. Norman August 28, 2009 I was on this Jury. The verdict was not solely based by his age. He was not wearing a helmet, he wasn’t wear a seat belt and drivng on a public road. The Yamaha “Ray” Rhino was not a “stock unit” it had aftermarket tires, lightbar and stereo which added to weight of the heavy vechicle. The CPSC requested that Yamaha add 2″ (100mm) spacers to each side of the rear tires and removal of the anti-sway bar. With the aftermarket tires that the “Ray Rhino” had, it exceeded the CPSC recommended modification. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (Posted: today) Six women have filed a joint, multiplaintiff BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit, all indicating that they suffered injuries and complications due to the recalled device’s defective design. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)Four Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)Lawsuit Claims BioZorb Marker Caused Chronic Pain, Multiple Surgeries After Lumpectomy (04/14/2025) 6 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has identified the six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that will serve as the first bellwether trials, to test allegations that the port catheters were defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCourt Indicates Bard PowerPort MDL Bellwether Lawsuits Should Include 3 Infection, 2 Thrombosis and 1 Fracture Case (05/06/2025)Lawyers Proposed 11 Bard Implantable Port Catheter Lawsuits as Bellwether Trial Candidates (04/30/2025)Bard PowerPICC Intravascular Catheter Leaks Linked to Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (04/21/2025) MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025)
Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (Posted: today) Six women have filed a joint, multiplaintiff BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit, all indicating that they suffered injuries and complications due to the recalled device’s defective design. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)Four Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)Lawsuit Claims BioZorb Marker Caused Chronic Pain, Multiple Surgeries After Lumpectomy (04/14/2025)
6 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has identified the six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that will serve as the first bellwether trials, to test allegations that the port catheters were defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCourt Indicates Bard PowerPort MDL Bellwether Lawsuits Should Include 3 Infection, 2 Thrombosis and 1 Fracture Case (05/06/2025)Lawyers Proposed 11 Bard Implantable Port Catheter Lawsuits as Bellwether Trial Candidates (04/30/2025)Bard PowerPICC Intravascular Catheter Leaks Linked to Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (04/21/2025)
MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025)